1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Andre Ward
3. Wladimir Klitschko
4. Manny Pacquiao
5. Roman Gonzalez
6. Guillermo Rigondeaux
7. Timothy Bradley Jr
8. Sergey Kovalev
9. Miguel Cotto
10. - - -
I rarely agree with espn or fat dan so fukk their rankings.
1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Andre Ward
3. Wladimir Klitschko
4. Manny Pacquiao
5. Roman Gonzalez
6. Guillermo Rigondeaux
7. Timothy Bradley Jr
8. Sergey Kovalev
9. Miguel Cotto
10. - - -
I rarely agree with espn or fat dan so fukk their rankings.
GGG over Kovalev just ain't right........ just what is one EC doing that the other hasn't done better
So I'm browsing ESPN's boxing page and check out their P4P rankings.
Nothing surprising at the top: Floyd Mayweather.
But the rest of the list seems up for debate.
1. Floyd Mayweather
2. Roman Gonzalez
3. Gennady Golovkin
4. Manny Pacquiao
5. Guillermo Rigondeaux
6. Andre Ward
7. Timothy Bradley Jr
8. Sergey Kovalev
9. Wladimir Klitschko
10. Miguel Cotto
I know Chocolatito and GGG are good, but have they really beaten the kind of quality competition to deserve to be #2 and #3?
ESPN's pound-for-pound rankings: Andre Ward is back
Danny Garcia is a welterweight now, and at 147, he's not anywhere near the top of that division, let alone one of the 10 best fighters in the world.To a casual fan, can Y'all explain why Danny Garcia isn't mentioned on here?
If Manny Pacquiao would have beaten Floyd, he would be the unanimous #1 fighter in the world.cotto, bradley, and manny shouldn't be on the list
and pound for pound rankings should be 1-3 only
If Manny Pacquiao would have beaten Floyd, he would be the unanimous #1 fighter in the world.
He lost and suddenly he's not even in your Top 10?
At least you live up to that WOAT banner.I already knew he would lose to Floyd and Manny hasn't fought anybody noteworthy in years
His last opponent worth something was 40 year old Marquez
Manny ain't fight a legit welterweight in god knows how long
he fought zero of the top guys in 140, what does it done other syphon energy off floyd's name
also I go for performance, skill and domination, you got guys who are head and shoulders above their division
How can Manny be ranked pound for pound when he's not even the best guy in his division he don't even got a belt right now
do you know what POUND FOR POUND MEANS
1. Floyd
2. Ward
3. Wlad
4. Rigondeux
5. Kovalev
nobody else is worthy to even be mentioned as p4p
At least you live up to that WOAT banner.
If your argument is that P4P should only be 3 fighters, fine.That's all you got, because you don't know enough to respond
how anyone who is not the best in their division be ranked p4p, that shyt don't even make sense
If your argument is that P4P should only be 3 fighters, fine.
But arguing that Manny shouldn't be on the list that goes up to 10 is just fukking stupid.
What the fukk are you talking about?Manny can't be ranked p4p because he's not even better than guys in his division
p4p is to rank fighters who can't fight each other because of weight class
If Manny can't be the best in his own weight how can you say he's better than Rigondeuz and Kovalev who are clearly the best in their class
you manny dikk riders are ridiculous
I already knew he would lose to Floyd and Manny hasn't fought anybody noteworthy in years
His last opponent worth something was 40 year old Marquez
Manny ain't fight a legit welterweight in god knows how long
he fought zero of the top guys in 140, what does it done other syphon energy off floyd's name
also I go for performance, skill and domination, you got guys who are head and shoulders above their division
How can Manny be ranked pound for pound when he's not even the best guy in his division he don't even got a belt right now
do you know what POUND FOR POUND MEANS
1. Floyd
2. Ward
3. Wlad
4. Rigondeux
5. Kovalev
nobody else is worthy to even be mentioned as p4p