Do we really need another Lesnar/Reigns Wrestlemania Main Event????

[Reality Check]

WWE is all about the spectacle and making the biggest match possible, and unfortunately... that's the biggest match possible

Which has been done at two previous Manias and going to be done again at Day 1. The biggest match possible is Lesnar/Lashley and for some reason they're stubbornly avoiding it.

Knowing these muthafukkas.. They gonna have Triple H return at number 30 at the Rumble and win it again so they can re-up that rematch. Thats probably why he hasnt been seen or heard.

According to Meltzer he's done in the ring due to what happened recently.

 

[Larry]

Which has been done at two previous Manias and going to be done again at Day 1. The biggest match possible is Lesnar/Lashley and for some reason they're stubbornly avoiding it.



According to Meltzer he's done in the ring due to what happened recently.

Lashley doesn’t move the needle


We like him. Love him even.. The general public doesn’t know who he is


Wrestling fans are so jaded lol

 

[Him]

Honestly Lesnar and Reigns does not need to happen at mania again.

 

[jadillac]

I mean, when it happened the first times, Roman wasn't on the level he is now.

It's like Vince was trying to force him as a star but he really wasn't. He was a corny, try hard babyface, and Brock was clearly on another level.

This time if they square off they're basically even in terms of credibility

 

[BrehWyatt]

WrestleMania isn't primarily for wrestling fans.

The sooner wrestling fans accept that, the better off.

 

[jwinfield]

We like him. Love him even.. The general public doesn’t know who he is

How many wrestlers do the general public know?

Isn't it the WWE's job to make people care?

The sooner wrestling fans accept that, the better off.

But what happens when the wrestlers from the 90s that casual fans know about can no longer wrestle?

 

[Larry]

How many wrestlers do the general public know?

Probably not many. Roman and Brock are two that they do


That’s my point lol. It’s the most mainstream match they could make. I don’t like it. I don’t wanna see it.. but that fact doesn’t change. It’s the biggest match they can make (not involving The Rock of Cena)



What I wanna see vs the biggest spectacle WWE could put on doesn’t equate. I’d rather see Jey vs Roman… I’m obviously not the target audience

 

[dh86]

Roman-Drew and Lesnar-Lashley makes perfect sense and would be fine. Would anyone NOT watch Mania if it werent Roman-Brock part 10?

 

[dh86]

I mean, when it happened the first times, Roman wasn't on the level he is now.

It's like Vince was trying to force him as a star but he really wasn't. He was a corny, try hard babyface, and Brock was clearly on another level.

This time if they square off they're basically even in terms of credibility

Yeah but itll be the third match with this current iteration. If they really need Roman Brock at Mania then they need to cancel the Day 1 match

 

[BrehWyatt]

But what happens when the wrestlers from the 90s that casual fans know about can no longer wrestle?

That's a WWE problem.

 

[AJtheOne]

They have a chance to create a new main eventer..Whoever beats Reigns is gonna be a made guy.

I really don't want another Reigns vs Lesnar but at least this time storyline makes perfect sense.

Drew is just boring af.

I can see them jazzing it up and having it a fatal 4 way or a triple threat main event to make it a lil bit different. And if Roman loses, he can say the odds were against him or he won't have to get pinned

 

[Mike the Executioner]

I mean, when it happened the first times, Roman wasn't on the level he is now.

It's like Vince was trying to force him as a star but he really wasn't. He was a corny, try hard babyface, and Brock was clearly on another level.

This time if they square off they're basically even in terms of credibility

They're not going to top the first match. It's a legitimate iconic main event at this point.

I know we're just talking here, but do we really need these guys in the main event for a third time? Especially when they don't have a good history as it is?

 

[CBoz]

They're not going to top the first match. It's a legitimate iconic main event at this point.

I know we're just talking here, but do we really need these guys in the main event for a third time? Especially when they don't have a good history as it is?

Vince thinks now that Brock is a baby face and Roman is a heel you need to see them fight 3 more times.

 

[Max.]

 

[Da_Eggman]

I’m guess Paul turns on Brock at day one and the feud must continue