Because if you actually bothered to read the article before you comment, Devonte Swing and other people could corroborate certain portions of her story and whether they actually happened including the "sex tape" existed.literally 34 years later.
How can this be proven?
How can guilt or innocence be proven 34 years later?
Because if you actually bothered to read the article before you comment, Devonte Swing and other people could corroborate certain portions of her story and whether they actually happened including the "sex tape" existed.
You lying clown ass nxgga...
Devonte Swings name isn't MENTIONED in that article.
You damn simp liar.