the sampling laws are racist...... cacs got rich making covers of black music but when hip hop came all of a sudden you can't repurpose a song or sample a 3-5 second loop without giving up all your royalties. I think Russell Simmons said he was gonna take the issue to the supreme court back in the day but probably didn't want the smoke
the label is supposed to clear the samples which makes it funny that it's always the artists who get sued for it
The label and the artist get sued. The artist get sued because copyright is split into two different rights, the right to perform and the right to reproduce. The artist get sued for performance. And whoever owns the royalties (usually the majority is owned by label) gets sued for the rest. I believe diddy owned the rights to these records. Regardless, the label usually covers this and accounts it against the artist so they may lose all royalties at the end of the day.
And I don't think copyright rules are racist at all. They originate far before rap really became as popular. There is a compulsory fee that an artist pays to use a sample but if you dont, you can be held liable for copyright infringement and that's where the original artist can take you to the bank.