wrong. You do not know the knowledge of either and this much is clear. so please. research.
wrong. You do not know the knowledge of either and this much is clear. so please. research.
c00ns gonna c00n
okay i'll be nice. basically.
NGE = I AM A GOD. I was born to be great.
Objectivism = I am very interested in (whatever desire,or field of work,study) and will use the tools around me to obtain this goal.
.
the more educated and white excuse is in essence, objective. This was not her goal. She spoke about race as a limiting factor and a man made distraction from one reaching his final goal of obtaining perfection. this among other things. I personally don't care about her rhetoric in the beginning.though I empathize with a lot of her beliefs. And I find it funny that she is always linked to the Right side of our government and conservatism/libertarianism. It's an oxymoron. But politics in relation to this belief is a whole different topic. Comparing Objectivist to 5%er's is like comparing apples and oranges. Take religion out of the picture. The name says it all. Objectivist don't recognize groups such as a "Nation". And NGE members see the idea of a Nation (not in the natural boundary sense, but the human similarity sense) and collective thought and belief as the center of who they are. They then preach a belief in being a God and the original man (which is the individualism idea that you are trying to connect.).but It contradicts itself in the eyes of the Objectivist, which doesn't suffer from this same backward thinking. So Like repeated before. You are wrong. There is nothing similar about Objectivism and the 5% nation. but good attempt. you're getting better.You also left out the belief that the individual's desires are always correct in Objectivism but you don't see the similarity in those statements? One is secular of course and not wrapped in a nice ribbon is all
Ayn Rand's audience was more educated and White. All the narrative stuff is based on the audience you're trying to please. Pump up the Black man with tales of their long lost empires and how a food source they they relied on during slavery is vile. It enthralls them and makes them apt to learn the lessons. All religions do this but with something like 5% as opposed to say Christianity is that it alllows for the individual to dictate and not some person in the sky.
No. you are wrong. Objectivists believe in no limitation to gaining ones own happiness and meaning in life. If I want pork. I eat pork. 5%'ers are not free and are prisoners of the beliefs and crackpot ideas of old men and fools.
Because you're wrong. The core philosophy is the same, one is of a slightly greater magnitude.
Dude...Just stop. I've watch you stretch your bad comparison for to long. The Supreme Wisdom which was given to Elijah Muhammad was an attempt to reverse the thinking placed on the psyche of American Blacks by telling them that they are not inferior but that they are actually superior and that their hsitory is divine and not just slavery. The Supreme Wisdom was a 'Black thing".....Ayn Rand wasn't championing for Blacks only.... Elijah Muhammad also promoted the HolyQuran which stresses to submit ones will to Allah. Ayn Rand promoted the embracing of ones ego. You cant embrace your ego and submit to Allah at the same time...
I'm not talking about the Nation of Islam.
SMH...Thats the wrong answer....The more you talk the more you expose what you don't know. The Supreme Wisdom that is used by the Nation Of Gods And Earths was given to Elijah Muhammad. This is info that you should know already but u obviously don't. This is why in a physical conversation those who aren't A Alike wouldn't be allowed in the cypher. But the internet has changed things and here you are.