Dez Bryant to Josh Normal "where I'm from, we unload the clip" :Lupe:

[R.U.L.E.]

WR's stats on Norman will NEVER tell the story because Norman never covers the #1 throughout the game. That's the point Dez is making.

12 plays covered that includes plays in which there are zero targets/run plays.

WR's have a limited amount of opportunities to expose Norman because he covers them on an extremely amount of limited plays.

On the 5 targets yesterday, Dez caught 3 one of which was a HUGE third down conversion that allowed us to take a double digit league. On this very play, Norman tried to Kurt Angle Dez's leg which he took offense too. A couple plays before that Zeke ran for 8 yards on first down and Norman was standing over him pointing and talking trash.

Norman is a bytch

 

[Sauce Dab]

@Brooklynzson 10 pages and not featured

 

[Hov]

WR's stats on Norman will NEVER tell the story because Norman never covers the #1 throughout the game. That's the point Dez is making.

12 plays covered that includes plays in which there are zero targets/run plays.

WR's have a limited amount of opportunities to expose Norman because he covers them on an extremely amount of limited plays.

On the 5 targets yesterday, Dez caught 3 one of which was a HUGE third down conversion that allowed us to take a double digit league. On this very play, Norman tried to Kurt Angle Dez's leg which he took offense too. A couple plays before that Zeke ran for 8 yards on first down and Norman was standing over him pointing and talking trash.

Norman is a bytch

My man - there is a real coaching reason why some NFL coaching prefer not to have thier top corner "track" on star WR every game. Like, this isn't Madden.

"The Jets under Rex Ryan were the perfect defense to take advantage of a guy like Revis at his best. They run a reasonably unusual defense to begin with and they were only too happy to adjust things in major ways that other teams might balk at. Moving one corner around can’t happen in isolation. By definition you need at least one other guy that can move too and potentially a third if you are going to track to the slot.

The Jets were able to exploit Revis tracking his man because they had Antonio Cromartie on the other side who was also capable of doing it. If you don’t have that, you end up with a corner in over his head being asked to move all over the field sticking to the No. 2 guy on offense. Your top guy might be matching up well with the No. 1 receiver, but your No. 2 guy is now out of his comfort zone moving all across the field and being picked on by the second best receiver.

The question defensive coaches are now asking themselves is whether it is easier to take away a team’s best receiver by matching him up with your best corner – wherever he lines up – or by leaving your best guy where he is and bracketing the No. 1 guy, taking advantage of the confidence you have in your best cover man to hold up on an island and dedicate coverage elsewhere in the scheme

The other point worth making is that taking the top receiver away only helps the defense if you play to a certain level every down you’re tracking him. Patrick Peterson surrendered seven touchdowns through the air last season tracking receivers. Is that really taking away an opponent’s best weapon? ."

 

[Roid Jones]

Even if Dez said that, he ain't gonna do shyt so Norman's reaction should have been

 

[R.U.L.E.]

My man - there is a real coaching reason why some NFL coaching prefer not to have thier top corner "track" on star WR every game. Like, this isn't Madden.

"The Jets under Rex Ryan were the perfect defense to take advantage of a guy like Revis at his best. They run a reasonably unusual defense to begin with and they were only too happy to adjust things in major ways that other teams might balk at. Moving one corner around can’t happen in isolation. By definition you need at least one other guy that can move too and potentially a third if you are going to track to the slot.

The Jets were able to exploit Revis tracking his man because they had Antonio Cromartie on the other side who was also capable of doing it. If you don’t have that, you end up with a corner in over his head being asked to move all over the field sticking to the No. 2 guy on offense. Your top guy might be matching up well with the No. 1 receiver, but your No. 2 guy is now out of his comfort zone moving all across the field and being picked on by the second best receiver.

The question defensive coaches are now asking themselves is whether it is easier to take away a team’s best receiver by matching him up with your best corner – wherever he lines up – or by leaving your best guy where he is and bracketing the No. 1 guy, taking advantage of the confidence you have in your best cover man to hold up on an island and dedicate coverage elsewhere in the scheme

The other point worth making is that taking the top receiver away only helps the defense if you play to a certain level every down you’re tracking him. Patrick Peterson surrendered seven touchdowns through the air last season tracking receivers. Is that really taking away an opponent’s best weapon? ."

Don't get it twisted. I never said that there isn't a coaching reason for it. What I'm saying is that Norman can't run his mouth the way he does when his scheme doesn't dictate him following the #1 receiver.

Everyone made a huge deal about Asmougha in Oakland because he "covered one side of the field" but again he never followed the #1. But dude kept his Mouth shut.

Normal kniw damn well he ain't following the #1 and has to play within his scheme and generally gets safety help but wants to brag about "no TDs".

Again the opportunities for WR's to make plays on Norman is super limited because he rarely covers them based on their scheme. Doesn't mean he can't be exposed.

People look at the stat line far too often to determine if someone been exposed. Dez had over 100 yards last Skins game. Norman barely covered Dez and Dez was only targeted once in the few times he did cover him in week 2. So then stat boys be like "oh see Dez was targeted once and had 0 catches Norman shut him down" when the reality is Norman covered Dez for like 3 plays in 4 quarters and at BEST Dez stat line against Norman would be 1 catch for 9 yards.

 

[Jax]

I condone snitching if it may save a life.

 

[Big Boss]

My man - there is a real coaching reason why some NFL coaching prefer not to have thier top corner "track" on star WR every game. Like, this isn't Madden.

"The Jets under Rex Ryan were the perfect defense to take advantage of a guy like Revis at his best. They run a reasonably unusual defense to begin with and they were only too happy to adjust things in major ways that other teams might balk at. Moving one corner around can’t happen in isolation. By definition you need at least one other guy that can move too and potentially a third if you are going to track to the slot.

The Jets were able to exploit Revis tracking his man because they had Antonio Cromartie on the other side who was also capable of doing it. If you don’t have that, you end up with a corner in over his head being asked to move all over the field sticking to the No. 2 guy on offense. Your top guy might be matching up well with the No. 1 receiver, but your No. 2 guy is now out of his comfort zone moving all across the field and being picked on by the second best receiver.

The question defensive coaches are now asking themselves is whether it is easier to take away a team’s best receiver by matching him up with your best corner – wherever he lines up – or by leaving your best guy where he is and bracketing the No. 1 guy, taking advantage of the confidence you have in your best cover man to hold up on an island and dedicate coverage elsewhere in the scheme

The other point worth making is that taking the top receiver away only helps the defense if you play to a certain level every down you’re tracking him. Patrick Peterson surrendered seven touchdowns through the air last season tracking receivers. Is that really taking away an opponent’s best weapon? ."

Facts

 

[NYC Rebel]

I don't see how anyone can say Norman isn't a top tier corner

 

[South Paw]

My man - there is a real coaching reason why some NFL coaching prefer not to have thier top corner "track" on star WR every game. Like, this isn't Madden.

"The Jets under Rex Ryan were the perfect defense to take advantage of a guy like Revis at his best. They run a reasonably unusual defense to begin with and they were only too happy to adjust things in major ways that other teams might balk at. Moving one corner around can’t happen in isolation. By definition you need at least one other guy that can move too and potentially a third if you are going to track to the slot.

The Jets were able to exploit Revis tracking his man because they had Antonio Cromartie on the other side who was also capable of doing it. If you don’t have that, you end up with a corner in over his head being asked to move all over the field sticking to the No. 2 guy on offense. Your top guy might be matching up well with the No. 1 receiver, but your No. 2 guy is now out of his comfort zone moving all across the field and being picked on by the second best receiver.

The question defensive coaches are now asking themselves is whether it is easier to take away a team’s best receiver by matching him up with your best corner – wherever he lines up – or by leaving your best guy where he is and bracketing the No. 1 guy, taking advantage of the confidence you have in your best cover man to hold up on an island and dedicate coverage elsewhere in the scheme

The other point worth making is that taking the top receiver away only helps the defense if you play to a certain level every down you’re tracking him. Patrick Peterson surrendered seven touchdowns through the air last season tracking receivers. Is that really taking away an opponent’s best weapon? ."

great post

sherm also talks about him being the rcb us the side a right handed qb wants to throw towards. throwing away from that corner forces a qb to throw across his body.

and sherm has started to follow in certain situations. when they had maxwell and browner they never had him do that. since the 2nd cb is weaker sherm will follow now at times. I expect sherm to follow Mike evans on sunday

 

[Buckeye Fever]

"IM NOT YOUR MOMMA" - JOSH NORMAN





​

And these hypocritical nikkaz on here would be like "Norman crossed the line"

 

[NYC Rebel]

My man - there is a real coaching reason why some NFL coaching prefer not to have thier top corner "track" on star WR every game. Like, this isn't Madden.

"The Jets under Rex Ryan were the perfect defense to take advantage of a guy like Revis at his best. They run a reasonably unusual defense to begin with and they were only too happy to adjust things in major ways that other teams might balk at. Moving one corner around can’t happen in isolation. By definition you need at least one other guy that can move too and potentially a third if you are going to track to the slot.

The Jets were able to exploit Revis tracking his man because they had Antonio Cromartie on the other side who was also capable of doing it. If you don’t have that, you end up with a corner in over his head being asked to move all over the field sticking to the No. 2 guy on offense. Your top guy might be matching up well with the No. 1 receiver, but your No. 2 guy is now out of his comfort zone moving all across the field and being picked on by the second best receiver.

The question defensive coaches are now asking themselves is whether it is easier to take away a team’s best receiver by matching him up with your best corner – wherever he lines up – or by leaving your best guy where he is and bracketing the No. 1 guy, taking advantage of the confidence you have in your best cover man to hold up on an island and dedicate coverage elsewhere in the scheme

The other point worth making is that taking the top receiver away only helps the defense if you play to a certain level every down you’re tracking him. Patrick Peterson surrendered seven touchdowns through the air last season tracking receivers. Is that really taking away an opponent’s best weapon? ."

Agree with everything you said except about Antonio Cromartie. He was incapable of following a WR due to his limitations

 

[Buckeye Fever]

That recruiter would have caught them hands off the strength

Nah, they dont get violent wit white daddeh

 

[Paradise50]

Norman a lil snitch BUT Dez a fukk boy for walking up on him and saying that


Dez responses on twitter making him look guilty anyway

 

[NYC Rebel]

Norman a lil snitch BUT Dez a fukk boy for walking up on him and saying that


Dez responses on twitter making him look guilty anyway

It's clear to me that it's about leaving it all on the table, but I'll let you run with Norman birch ass dishonesty

 

[Ku$h Parker]

How y'all doing down there? Can't hear y'all nikkas three stories atop the division

That 1 L lookin good tho