Honestly I always felt RT was flawed and there are tons of Revisionist reviews. As for reviewers being paid off. Of course this happens. It's no different than Big Phrama paying off politicans. Bad Reviews can derail a movie and possibly hurt it's box office. So naturally sudios want to avoid that. "Reviews KILLED Fantastic 4 this past summer" I honestly think there was conspiracy with "BatsVSupes" reviews espeically when you see what "Iron Man 2 + 3, Thor 2" got. Please. The question is why would Marvel be scaed of competition when they are doing so well? Easy with no huge comp they can clean up every time with everything. But now Fox is making a comback with the last X-men movie and now "Deadpool" being a surprise hit and the new Xmen movie is looking like it might do well also.
People forget "The Dark Knight" was the first Billion Dollar comic book film and it came out the same year as "Iron Man 1" did so it's not like DC can't have success it's just they are doing this "Shared Universe" thing for the first time. "MOS" may have got average reviews but it still almost did 700 Million WW and which was way better than "Superman Returns". So box office wise DC is doing great but critically not so much. I'm sorry but if these critics called it like it was Marvel would of had a couple more"Rotten" films then currently. I didn't agree with them all the time but I'd take Siskel and Ebert over the Entire RT any day of the week. But people have to remember, all critics aren't created equal. At the end of the day you have to be a judge and the ultimate critic. I've watch films that have gotten horrible reviews and loved them.
Both "Bad Boys" films got trashed by critics and we all know there classics. Sometimes RT gets it right and they get it wrong. They aren't perfect and people need to stop acting like they are the end all be all. As for Devin, Yes he's a Marvel guy but I wouldn't say it's a conspiracy with him. "Civil War" just may be the better crafted film, with that said you can tell there are some Bias reviews against DC just by the tone of review. I've already read some "Civil War" reviews that litterally start out with "Unlike Batman V Superman", lol. I like Collider and Campea but I understand if people think they are in bed with Disneybecause of the "Star Wars" connection but I wouldn't say they are too bias because they talk about every movie and everything.
GOATS
Honestly...I do not think it is Marvel. I think it all about DISNEY and its obsession to rule and take over EVERYTHING and willing to go things, even unethical or sometimes illegal underhanded moves they'll go through to crush the competition. Now this isn't ONLY Disney. I feel that EVERY HOLLYWOOD studio was heavily guilty of this. It is in part why the Oscars are such a joke today due to the politics and biases and corporate paying out votes that comes into play. But truth be told, Disney IS the most powerful studio out and really trying to monopolize the game. But that's Hollywood business and it is what it is.
But as for the modern day critic. It is a sad state. I cannot and will not attribute if any one of them were paid to smear, even though many of professional critics do work for a big-time market owned by media corporations such as WB, Fox, and Disney. But most of the critics that contribute on RT today are purely fanboys with a computer. They are no more different than your typical Coli member. You go on Twitter, since we are speaking on Faraci specifically, and he go and rants just like an obsessed fanboy.
The other issue is DEFINITELY bandwagoning or a presumption of a film being garbage purely due to the brand name OR who's the producer or director. You mentioned Bad Boys.... and really, MICHAEL BAY. And just by his name alone, critics and people with that groupthink mentality (I used to be guilty of this myself) automatically just going to go in and just HATE anything he directs OR producers.... yet, since Bad Boys, he is one of the most SUCCESSFUL filmmakers of this generation... this despite virtually every film he was involved in has been panned. And this isn't by ANY defense to many of his films that I view as garbage in my personal opinion, but a lot those films WERE ENTERTAINING and that's what all his fanbase typically wants. It's why Transformers stay making money. As well as the last and this new Ninja Turtles film is going to be a hit as well. But you know going IN that critics are going to trash it even without even trying to look at it from an open mind....
The biggest irony of it all is that Bay wrote the blueprint formula that Feige used to make Marvel a repeated formulaic success which is a bunch of action and cheesy lighthearted fun without consequence not suspending belief on most things. This is also why those Fast and Furious films as well as Jurassic World are MEGA successes.... generally, this is all popcorn movie goers WANT. It just so funny that those films, the Jurassic Worlds, FF's, Transformers, all get mixed to bad reviews most of the time, but when it is Marvel which does no different, even if they ADMIT flaws to the film someone like Jeremy Jahns (to whom I usually like, but puts his Star Wars/Marvel fanboy bias lenses on) will still rate it a perfect score despite its flaws like he did with Civil War.
Lastly... I REALLY miss Siskel and Ebert. Hear what they said back in the 90's... it almost made me shed a tear how it is worst TODAY then it was becoming back then!
Good post, BTW
@Rapmastermind