I dont see why people feel the need to defense Deshaun here ... at best, he still clearly was being a POS
You can read some of his own depositions, its not good
Yeah I tried to stay out of it but you're right he's a sick nikka.
I dont see why people feel the need to defense Deshaun here ... at best, he still clearly was being a POS
You can read some of his own depositions, its not good
What made it legal since he wasnt charged?Most recently he admitted that one of the massage therapists left in tears (she alleges he took it out and touched her with it) and then he played dumb why she would leave in tears
I mean its pretty clear what the pattern is here. He would contact woman on IG (reportedly HUNDREDS of different women), he would hire them for a massage, and then pull his shyt out mid massage and try to parlay it into sex. It sounds like on a few instances the women agreed and it was consensual. The problem is the MANY other times where they said no and felt violated by this dude whipping it out and start jacking off in front of them.
Legal or not, who is defending that type of behavior?
Im not sure what you're asking but Im not too concerned over the legal positions of this story, my whole point is, why would anyone go out of their way to defend his behavior here? Even in the best case, dude was acting inappropriately / moving like a scumbag. Like this aint normal behaviorWhat made it legal since he wasnt charged?
Where them nikkas at that still think Watson is playing anytime this season
I literally said criminal trespass, so you arent making a distinction worth a difference.Ah, good old Justia. This article is more of a "criminal trespass basics" rather than an actual law or statute, so it isn't binding on anything. The part about being "told to leave" is throwing you off because you're reading this to literally mean that the woman had to explicitly tell him to leave, and that's not how it works. In most jurisdictions, like I said, if you've knowingly gone beyond the scope of your visit without consent then you can still be found liable, even if the property owner doesn't explicitly tell you to leave. The Texas state law for criminal trespass explicitly mentions consent, and silence isn't consent, no matter how much you want it to be. It's based on all of the circumstances, and a woman in her own home being too shocked to speak up when a man invited for a specific purpose strips buck naked has a pretty strong case in the real world.
The thing is, he's not facing criminal charges anyway, so criminal trespass isn't relevant here. He's facing civil charges, and I haven't seen the exact claim of action but I assume it's for battery.
Let these nikkas tell it, nobody wants to ask why a black man in America wasn’t charged for crimes if these stories are trueThese stories don't even make sense. How he get it on her face and chest unless she let him splash her
The physics don't work especially if she claimed she stopped the massage
These stories don't even make sense. How he get it on her face and chest unless she let him splash her
The physics don't work especially if she claimed she stopped the massage
66 women