Deshaun Watson accused of sexual assault (Cleared of Charges)

[bigde09]

Breh you my guy but I could almost swear that hot takes like this expose dudes who have a lot of experience with women vs those who don't.

I'm not even saying I'm Don Juan out there, but I am saying that I have enough experience with women to tell you that ain't no woman ever "freezing in the moment and doing something out of fear" unless you making threats towards her or putting a gun on the nightstand or something.

I've had women who told me to get the hell out their house while I was butt naked. One chic got mad at me for something I said and angrily grabbed my t-shirt and put it over my head and told me to get the hell out.

These women ain't scared of us.

Aren't you the same dude that would walk his girl to the bathroom when yall would go to the movies because you feared for her safety?

I really hope notWhat a terrible post gotdamn.

 

[Flex Luger]

 

[Gus Money]

What nonexistant standard have i made up, post it.

Facts are facts though, if you cant even posit that someone violated tour wishes its hard to claim they violated your rights

Your claims about not explicitly telling someone to leave if you’ve let them in your home and they start jacking off. It’s a completely made up standard that doesn’t exist, and like I said you’re not a lawyer so it’s clear you don’t know much what you’re talking about. Most jurisdictions use a reasonable person standard and it’s more than reasonable that what he did goes beyond the purpose of his visit, arguably making him an intruder (but I don’t think any of the victims are even accusing him of trespass unless I missed something, so you’re just harping on this weird angle and not even making a good argument).

It is perfectly legal, since he was in itee to her home.

What would be illegal is if she told him to stop and leave and he refuses, but she doesnt say that is what happened.

Again, this isn’t how it works. If you let someone in your home for a specific reason/purpose, like for a massage or other business transaction, and they go beyond the scope of that visit and literally start masturbating, then any reasonable person would agree they’ve now become an intruder. It’s not perfectly legal to do something like that, and her silence alone wouldn’t be taken as consent as she claims to have been in shock, which is more than understandable.

Bro you and a few others are really in here saying it’s perfectly ok for this man to whip his dikk out in her home like that just because she didn’t say no right away. Take a beat to think about what you’re even arguing for right now.

 

[Paper Boi]

that's dumb as fukk.

this america anyone can so anyone for anything at anytime.

he can be getting sued once a year for the rest of his life, whether he ever been in the same room as the person or not.

 

[David_TheMan]

Your claims about not explicitly telling someone to leave if you’ve let them in your home and they start jacking off. It’s a completely made up standard that doesn’t exist, and like I said you’re not a lawyer so it’s clear you don’t know much what you’re talking about. Most jurisdictions use a reasonable person standard and it’s more than reasonable that what he did goes beyond the purpose of his visit, arguably making him an intruder (but I don’t think any of the victims are even accusing him of trespass unless I missed something, so you’re just harping on this weird angle and not even making a good argument).

Again, this isn’t how it works. If you let someone in your home for a specific reason/purpose, like for a massage or other business transaction, and they go beyond the scope of that visit and literally start masturbating, then any reasonable person would agree they’ve now become an intruder. It’s not perfectly legal to do something like that, and her silence alone wouldn’t be taken as consent as she claims to have been in shock, which is more than understandable.

Bro you and a few others are really in here saying it’s perfectly ok for this man to whip his dikk out in her home like that just because she didn’t say no right away. Take a beat to think about what you’re even arguing for right now.

No its not made up standard its actually a legal standard for criminal trespass. You have to disinvite or notify the person to leave and then they would have to act against the order of the property owner for there to be a law broken.

A person being an a$$hole in a private residence or business isnt illegal, its only shen that a$$hole breaks the law and violates the rights of the owner who is either telling them to leave or stop an action is when the law can become involved.

You can vecome an intruder if tou were invited, you are a invited guest. You must disinvite before legal remedy, can clIm a person is a a$$hole and you want to aue if you never asked them to leave.

 

[No1]

No.

 

[En Sabah Nur]

that's dumb as fukk.

this america anyone can so anyone for anything at anytime.

he can be getting sued once a year for the rest of his life, whether he ever been in the same room as the person or not.

Yeah if you sexually harass/assault 30 women, only one of them should be able to sue you, and it better be quick

The fact that there are dudes in here actually looking for the fine print on why Watson's behavior wasn't completely unacceptable is disturbing. Coming to this place often makes me thankful that I don't have daughters out here sharing space with degenerates like some of you

 

[Apprentice]

Lol y’all really like the rest of these folks

If u can’t see there’s something off here, really nothin to say. nikkas will believe anything

 

[Paper Boi]

Yeah if you sexually harass/assault 30 women, only one of them should be able to sue you, and it better be quick

The fact that there are dudes in here actually looking for the fine print on why Watson's behavior wasn't completely unacceptable is disturbing. Coming to this place often makes me thankful that I don't have daughters out here sharing space with degenerates like some of you

then don't sign him/trade for him at all if a lawsuit can ruin the contract because he cannot control whether someone will sue him again.

 

[Big Boss]

 

[Gus Money]

No its not made up standard its actually a legal standard for criminal trespass. You have to disinvite or notify the person to leave and then they would have to act against the order of the property owner for there to be a law broken.

A person being an a$$hole in a private residence or business isnt illegal, its only shen that a$$hole breaks the law and violates the rights of the owner who is either telling them to leave or stop an action is when the law can become involved.

You can vecome an intruder if tou were invited, you are a invited guest. You must disinvite before legal remedy, can clIm a person is a a$$hole and you want to aue if you never asked them to leave.

I shouldn’t have let myself get sucked in to this but post an source for where you found this and I’ll try to explain it once more.

 

[David_TheMan]

I shouldn’t have let myself get sucked in to this but post an source for where you found this and I’ll try to explain it once more.

Criminal Trespass Laws

Criminal trespass occurs when someone intentionally enters someone else's property without permission, or remains there after being told to leave.

www.justia.com

Key Fact
A defendant may be guilty of trespass even if they initially had permission to be on another party’s property if they remained there after they were told to leave.

 

[Gus Money]

Criminal Trespass Laws

Criminal trespass occurs when someone intentionally enters someone else's property without permission, or remains there after being told to leave.

www.justia.com

Ah, good old Justia. This article is more of a "criminal trespass basics" rather than an actual law or statute, so it isn't binding on anything. The part about being "told to leave" is throwing you off because you're reading this to literally mean that the woman had to explicitly tell him to leave, and that's not how it works. In most jurisdictions, like I said, if you've knowingly gone beyond the scope of your visit without consent then you can still be found liable, even if the property owner doesn't explicitly tell you to leave. The Texas state law for criminal trespass explicitly mentions consent, and silence isn't consent, no matter how much you want it to be. It's based on all of the circumstances, and a woman in her own home being too shocked to speak up when a man invited for a specific purpose strips buck naked has a pretty strong case in the real world.

The thing is, he's not facing criminal charges anyway, so criminal trespass isn't relevant here. He's facing civil charges, and I haven't seen the exact claim of action but I assume it's for battery.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

Lol y’all really like the rest of these folks

If u can’t see there’s something off here, really nothin to say. nikkas will believe anything

The longer he allows this vase to stay open, the more likelyhood more lawsuits follow. Dude should have just paid the lawsuits off from the jump and kept it moving.

 

[Apprentice]

The longer he allows this vase to stay open, the more likelyhood more lawsuits follow. Dude should have just paid the lawsuits off from the jump and kept it moving.

Lol he tried that and nikkas sayin that’s an admittance of guilt