Department of Defense: 5 Chinese warships spotted along the Bering Sea coast of Alaska

[Master Teacher]

Too late.



You don't even know what anti-missile missiles are, or anti-satellite capabilities. check: Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense, RIM-161 Standard Missile 3; Operation Burnt Frost. [this is the shyt we let people see]. The DongFeng 26 is a nice platform, but don't be fooled. They're not fully in service yet, and need a lot of work before they're a dedicated "carrier-killer"



You mean Taiwan, ally of America?

We could hit Taiwan and/or China without using the Navy at all if we wanted. In the case of a real war, we'd have Japan and South Korea and the Philippines, all of which are close enough to rain destruction down on China with land-based Tomahawks.



[citation needed]



And yet, you fail to think about the superiority that America has in the types of unconventional warfare that you stan for. China's still rocking Kilo-class diesel submarines. America's bringing in the Virginia Class, and we've still got 40-45 Los Angeles class 688's. As far as covert warfare...ask yourself what happened to the Tianjin SuperComputing Center, supposedly a source of a lot of Chinese hacking attempts?



This fool thinks air superiority is useless

once again you are fool

I didn't say Taiwan wasn't an alley I was just comparing what the Navy would do against a nation that could actually defend itself


When did I say air superiority is useless, I said fighter jets, dog fighting is outdated, once again you are a moron

The Aegis combat system would be useless against Russia's military, once again you have no clue what you are talking about

 

[Misanthrope]

once again you are fool

I didn't say Taiwan wasn't an alley I was just comparing what the Navy would do against a nation that could actually defend itself


When did I say air superiority is useless, I said fighter jets, dog fighting is outdated, once again you are a moron

The Aegis combat system would be useless against Russia's military, once again you have no clue what you are talking about

Once again your whole post is [citation needed]

It's real hard to be a fool again when you haven't proved it the first time.

I named systems with capabilities you can look up. Now do the same and prove your wild point or stfu. And try not to insult people when you get your citation. This isn't TSC, you're not cutting a promo.

 

[Master Teacher]

Once again your whole post is [citation needed]

It's real hard to be a fool again when you haven't proved it the first time.

I named systems with capabilities you can look up. Now do the same and prove your wild point or stfu. And try not to insult people when you get your citation. This isn't TSC, you're not cutting a promo.

9 months ago Russia already proved that Aegis was some bullshyt, they flew a plane over the USS Donald Cook undetected and then simulated a 12 missile launch of their own which had them shook

you have no clue what you are talking about, that aegis shyt don't work lmao

also you have avoided the topic of air craft carriers being useless in modern war

submarines are too advanced now and will sink them quickly without even being detected

 

[Arithmetic]

@Misanthrope understands: "this is what we let people see". Exactly. These fools think the most powerful military has to resort to parades that display our weaponry to the international community

 

[Misanthrope]

9 months ago Russia already proved that Aegis was some bullshyt, they flew a plane over the USS Donald Cook undetected and then simulated a 12 missile launch of their own which had them shook

you have no clue what you are talking about, that aegis shyt don't work lmao

also you have avoided the topic of air craft carriers being useless in modern war

submarines are too advanced now and will sink them quickly without even being detected

Cool, the Russians may have developed a new jamming tech. The problem with your assertion, is that for it to work, Russia needed to overfly the boat with an old ass Su-24. In a war situation, what are the odds that a Su-24 is going to get close enough to a fleet to use the device? [that's what air-to-air, and Carrier Air support is for]. shyt's a team effort, with all sides bringing something to the table. Carriers bring planes that stop planes, destroyers stop missiles, submarines kill submarines. And our submarine game is on fleek.

Did you note the part where I detailed the amount of high-end submarines America has?

You've avoided every topic [anti-missile missiles, anti-satellite capability (hard to get them Dong Fengs on target without satellite guidance), allied countries and bases near any potential enemy (Poland; Turkey; NATO in the Baltics; S. Korea; Japan; Philippines), land-based missiles operating in conjunction with allies, American submarine tech and numbers, and possible American covert action] except the one incident involving Aegis.

People hate this country so much (with good reason) that they engage in these fantasies that someone's going to really fukk our shyt up. The real threats to America are internal and economic, not military.