You started by saying Slotkin has bad ideology thoughHer ideology isn't why she won, she won because her opponent was dog shyt and so was biden administration

You started by saying Slotkin has bad ideology thoughHer ideology isn't why she won, she won because her opponent was dog shyt and so was biden administration
She does, she doesn't have to be a fat neoliberal anti black zionist pig to win in MichiganYou started by saying Slotkin has bad ideology though![]()
She does, she doesn't have to be a fat neoliberal anti black zionist pig to win in Michigan
My god, you really are fukking stupid.50%+ is a majority.
Wrong again. It’s one thing to promote your beliefs and defend your community.
its another thing to outright lie.
The largest responses/plurality of people disagree with this statement. Can you read?
They're qualitatively fringe, dumbass.Now its fringe when you lose the majority stance
![]()
THIS WAS NOT YOUR CLAIM. You can't seriously be trying this dumbass routine when your post is on this very page, moron.
Guy who doesn't know the difference between a majority and a plurality: "Yes, I let Republican messaging and framing decide my personal politics. And yes, I do happen to currently smell burnt toast."I like that @King Kreole admitted the certain point has majority FEMALE support around laws republicans are passing around trans sports and youth gender transitions. Then he had the audacity to call them marginal issues. Well that’s funny because those are core to conservative messaging on trans issues.
I want yall to screen shot that. He admitted it. He lost. I won.
You admitted the ones republicans passed laws against had popular female support.My god, you really are fukking stupid.
Hey Napoleon, how many issues polled featured a response by women supporting or opposing the poll question greater than 50% (aka a majority, dumbass)?
why did women have the largest plurality or outright majority in the the issues I posted?Oh wait, what happened to "the majority of women"? Now it's "the largest responses/plurality"? Either you're stupid enough to not know the difference between a majority and a plurality, or you're being a disingenuous worm and hoping that the rest of us have your room-temperature IQ.
The issues republicans passed laws against aren’t fringe.They're qualitatively fringe, dumbass.
THIS WAS NOT YOUR CLAIM. You can't seriously be trying this dumbass routine when your post is on this very page, moron.
You admitted the ones republicans passed laws against had popular female support.
Admit you were wrong or lied about your claim and I will answer your question.why did women have the largest plurality or outright majority in the the issues I posted?
Republicans cynically ginning up fearmongering campaigns around incredibly infrequent occurrences does not magically make those issues and their framing central unless you have outsourced your brain to Republicans, which you and Democratic leadership are doing because you're gutless shytbirds.The issues republicans passed laws against aren’t fringe.
Trump made his largest 2024 campaign expenses on those ads.
You proved your claim to be incorrect.I proved my claim.
"A mix of moral and twisting language."You on the other hand haven’t even pretended to post anything. I keep showing data that’s less than 6 months old and you keep replying with a mix of moral and twisting language.
Just admit you don’t care about polls then we can argue biology. And when you lose that battle we can talk about metaethics. Then we can talk whatever frame-reference-shifting view you want.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Muted response to transgender bathroom bills reflects a broader retreat on trans rights, advocates say
GOP state lawmakers are pushing the most extreme versions of laws that restrict transgender people from using restrooms since North Carolina enacted HB 2 in 2016.www.nbcnews.com
![]()
![]()
Admit you were wrong or lied about your claim and I will answer your question.
Republicans cynically ginning up fearmongering campaigns around incredibly infrequent occurrences does not magically make those issues and their framing central unless you have outsourced your brain to Republicans, which you and Democratic leadership are doing because you're gutless shytbirds.
You proved your claim to be incorrect.
"A mix of moral and twisting language."
I have you in a kimura and I'm not letting go. Just admit you're too stupid to get out of this one and tap out man.
I've never claimed to care about polls on this issue. YOU do. And the polls YOU posted aren't supporting YOUR argument moron. You shot yourself.
I'm starting to worry you don't know how to read period. Do you believe 50% is a majority, Napoleon? If 50% of people are in favor of something, is that a majority?I’m starting to worry about you did you not read the polls? Do you not know what 50% means? Have you never read cross tabs on a statistical report? Have you never seen polling data and it’s raw form before?
Yeah I probably would fail the math and statistics course you took to get your degree from Liberty University because I'm not a creationist. But for the rest of us in reality, a majority means GREATER than 50%.Not only am I correct but you would functionally fail every course I’ve ever taken in any higher education lane regarding math or statistics for that matter. Even in terms of political science, I think people are ashamed at how brazen you are with this sort of cheap fodder you’re taking for legitimacy.
You made a statement about where the majority of women stand on transgender issues then posted a poll where only 25% of the questions featured a majority of women taking the opposing position on the issues. You were wrong and you are wrong.I need you to read things a little bit more slowly. I’m correct.
This is not the claim you made. You made a statement about the majority, and now you're trying to weasel in an argument about the plurality. Admit you were wrong.@King Kreole what does it mean when you have a plurality of votes on a topic and no other substituent group comes close?
That means that you lead on the issue.
I'm starting to worry you don't know how to read period. Do you believe 50% is a majority, Napoleon? If 50% of people are in favor of something, is that a majority?
Yeah I probably would fail the math and statistics course you took to get your degree from Liberty University because I'm not a creationist. But for the rest of us in reality, a majority means GREATER than 50%. You made a statement about where the majority of women stand on transgender issues then posted a poll where only 25% of the questions featured a majority of women taking the opposing position on the issues. You were wrong and you are wrong.
So on 75% of the issues in the poll you cited, there is no majority opinion against the transgender community held by women respondents. A minority of the women polled disagree with the statement that a transgender man is a man. A minority of the women polled disagree with the statement that a transgender woman is a woman. A minority of the women polled are against government employees using their preferred pronouns. A minority of the women polled are against allowing transgender people to change their government ID to match their preferred gender identity. A minority of the women polled agree with banning children from attending drag shows. It is only on the two fringe issues of hormone therapy for children and sports teams that a majority of women polled agree with your positions. And you think this is a checkmate? You're playing checkers.
You're illiterate.
This is not the claim you made. You made a statement about the majority, and now you're trying to weasel in an argument about the plurality. Admit you were wrong.
![]()
Completely irrelevant non sequitur posting. You said majority, and when your own evidence proved you wrong, you're trying to water your argument down to plurality without admitting you were wrong.This is the same argument kamala Harris supporters were using to say Trump didn’t have a mandate because trump didn’t win 50% of the votes, but a PLURALITY.
![]()
Election 360: Does Trump really have a ‘mandate’ in his second term?
UCLA public policy and political science expert Mark Peterson examines the claims.newsroom.ucla.edu
https://www.npr.org/2024/12/03/nx-s1-5213810/2024-presidential-election-popular-vote-trump-kamala-harris![]()
Trump did not win a majority of the 2024 vote, only a plurality. He has no mandate.
Donald Trump does not have a mandate. I stand with U.S. Rep. Al Green, writes Michelle Mulanax of Sagamore Hills in a letter to the editor.www.cleveland.com
https://www.beaumontenterprise.com/opinions/letters/article/trump-s-plurality-win-means-doesn-t-represent-19986411.php
![]()
The size of Donald Trump's 2024 election victory, explained in 5 charts
How big was President-elect Donald Trump’s victory? It was clear, but not a landslide by historical standards. Here’s how 2024 sized up to other recent elections.www.pbs.org
![]()
Trump Does Not Have a Mandate
He didn't win a majority of the popular vote, and the idea that America has gone full MAGA is outlandish.www.thenation.com
You are very confused and lost in the the debate you're participating in. Turn in for the night and try again tomorrow.Read what you wrote, likkle bwoy: