I was showing you the fault in your logical argument by applying your same formulation to a different example. It's not changing the root topic, it's one of the most common pedagogical techniques.
Transitive properties don’t work in arguments if the underlying premises aren’t analogous.
You're confused. Racism and transphobia are two forms of bigotry.
What’s transphobic here? Should “trans women” compete against biological women in competitive sports?
Just because they're not exactly the same doesn't mean they're completely different,
Well thats kinda the problem with your analogy
just like racism and sexism aren't exactly the same. It depends on the context you're arguing within. And there are many examples of racism being deployed through elective contexts, such as denial of naming rights, religion, hairstyles, language, etc. Racism isn't as simple as you make it out to be, there is a constellation of factors and contexts through which it can manifest.
Is the UK Supreme Court transphobic?
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that the legal definition of a woman should be based on biological sex.
www.bbc.co.uk
A transgender person being able to match their government ID with their gender identity is not an example of them becoming transgender, any more than people referring to you as a female would mean you're becoming a woman.
Its identity fraud
SEX should be the marker, not “gender” or whatever that means. These are official documents that represent reality.
Transgenderism is just when your self-perceived gender identity doesn't match the gender you were assigned at birth.
So-they-say. It doesn’t mean such a thing is actually happening any more than believing prayer workers because a lot of people say so. It’s a religious endeavor.
Sex-reassignment surgery and changing government documentation is just about having bodily and social alignment and acceptance of your innate identity.
Without modern medicine can you “be trans?”
Just because a black person is passing or has vitiligo doesn't mean they're no longer black. And if the next time you renew your license at the DMV and they put an F next to your Sex it doesn't mean you're a woman until you rectify that mistake, even with the discomfort you'd feel with having that be your state-determined gender designation.
You just conflated sex and gender.
Your license doesn’t say “gender” it says “sex"
Depends on what arena you're talking about when you reference an unfair advantage, but this is not the bullying that TNC is talking about. If the extent of anti-Trans activism was doing academic studies on the differences between Trans women and Cis women, we would not be in the place we are right now.
The difference is that “trans women” are biological males.
Living every day as halloween doesn’t incur special rights nor demand research initiatives.
There is no definitive opinion held by cis women on this issue, so you're going to have to form your own opinion on this.
Why is so hard for you to listen to actual women?
The UK case was brought on by…lesbians
We are a group of women from all over Scotland working to protect and strengthen women and children's rights.
forwomen.scot
And not being sexually interested in trans women is completely irrelevant to this topic. I don't want to date a woman taller that 6'4" but that doesn't mean I think tall women deserve less rights, opportunities or humanity that shorter women. No one is claiming there is no material difference between trans women and cis women, they're saying trans women belong as a subcategory of woman.
Are trans-women the same as biological women?
I don't know what oppression of CIS women you're talking about but the bullying TNC is mentioning is the passing of laws specifically targeting trans people for discrimination.
Trans people aren’t being discriminated against if they’re being held to the same standard “cis-gendered” people are.