www.liberalpatriot.com
Educate methe Senate can just ignore parliamentarian rules whenever they want?
And had they tried this, you think it would've passed the Senate?
It's weird to me how people expect Dems to do things that the makeup of Congress inherently prevents (but have no such expectations of the GOP).
You're correctThere is no argument. They could have ignored the parliamentarian if they wanted:
The History of Congressional Parliamentarians and Why They Matter
They provide nonpartisan advice and expertise on the legislative process. In recent decades, their role has grown more influential, especially with budgetary matters, but not everyone agrees that’s good.www.governing.com
the precedent is there.
brudda, you keep talking about the parliamentarian. I am telling you the Dems didn’t have enough senators who wanted to increase the minimum wage.
What’s the winning answer and stance on criminal justice?Dems lose an election and you over here telling them they should be bragging about locking people up
Edit: not to forget black folks was shytting on kamala for being a cop in the first place
Same stance that brought crime down since the pandemic. Not the red state stance that has high crime.
Bro goddamn. I’m serious. Can you answer the question?
Is this your electoral strategy to conform to everything due to republicans winning an election? I'm generally concerned about your mental health if you generally think the electoral strategy is to become republicans because trump beat Joe bidens ecomomy
Please. Just answer the question. Please.
Do you think Democrats should prioritize electoral success over the actual consequences of such policies (exaggerated tough-on-crime nonsense)?
He think we should go back to the 1950s laws and views so we can win elections easier. Literally he's advocating for tougher crime laws, throwing minorities under the bus to win elections
Its booker. C’mon.
