Not sure what political parties have to do with the merits of the case
Democratic Party Rebuild
- Thread starter the next guy
- Start date
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
AquaCityBoy
Veteran
I keep saying it. Why do you keep lying that you're black when you're Indian??????
Reported for lying. I’ve given you direct proof I’m black.
You’re right bro. Men can be women and KBJ is a neocon republican.
Case has nothing to do with men can be women idiot lol. It's a discrimination suit against men in general not being allowed to have a surgery based on gender
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
He’s trans racial.
You can change your race but not your gender identity evidently
Why should children be allowed to have gender transition surgery?
Not sure what that has to do with this topic, stay on topic. Your sexual fantasies behind transgender people have nothing to do with this case
OK, whats the case about, genius.
Pull Up the Roots
Veteran
Anyone else notice the uptick in this guy citing alt-right accounts like this to push this anti-trans agenda? I saw him posting "end wokness" earlier. I really do wish people like you would disappear. People like you are more of a detriment to this party than almost anything else.
Anybody with a functioning brain (and acting in good faith) understands that her central point was about Tennessee using the same rational that was rejected in Loving to claim that the ban is non-discriminatory because it applies equally to boys and girls, just like it was claimed that Loving was non-discriminatory because it applied equally to both Black and white people. And that if it stands, it would undermine the foundational principles of equal protection. It's a simple comparative analysis.
Its a direct quote from a Supreme Court justice I support.
You must vote DEMOCRAT🐴 🔵 for ONE single reason; The GOP make WHITE ONLY COURTS 👨🏼⚖️ for 40+ YEARS
Trump is out here nominating COMPLETELY unqualified people in their 30s and 40s to serve on federal courts!!!!!!!! MANY OF WHOM HAVE NEVER TRIED CASES!!!!!!! OR WRITTEN BRIEFS!!!!! Sign In | Bloomberg Law Jonathan Kobes is one of six Trump judiciary nominees to receive a...
www.thecoli.com
If democrat or left wing twitter accounts wont be honest about this, then the only people posting clips that I can share about this will be from republicans and bad-faith conservatives.
Again, why are you defending her comments? Be clear in your reponse
Trans surgery is a voluntary procedure, not a congenital phenotype. Why compare an ostensible racist legal paradigm to a voluntary procedure?
Pull Up the Roots
Veteran
I didn't know "Greg Price" was on the SCOTUS.Its a direct quote from a Supreme Court justice I support.
You must vote DEMOCRAT🐴 🔵 for ONE single reason; The GOP make WHITE ONLY COURTS 👨🏼⚖️ for 40+ YEARS
Trump is out here nominating COMPLETELY unqualified people in their 30s and 40s to serve on federal courts!!!!!!!! MANY OF WHOM HAVE NEVER TRIED CASES!!!!!!! OR WRITTEN BRIEFS!!!!! Sign In | Bloomberg Law Jonathan Kobes is one of six Trump judiciary nominees to receive a...
If democrat or left wing twitter accounts wont be honest about this, then the only people posting clips that I can share about this will be from republicans and bad-faith conservatives.
Again, why are you defending her comments? Be clear in your reponse
Trans surgery is a voluntary procedure, not a congenital phenotype. Why compare an ostensible racist legal paradigm to a voluntary procedure?
You have no principles. The enemy of my enemy ain't my friend.
Her comparison wasn't about the specific subject matter (interracial marriage vs. gender-affirming care). It was about the legal argument Tennessee is using where they claim that the law is non-discriminatory because it applies equally to everyone. They're using the same flawed logic Virginia used to defend its ban on interracial marriage in Loving.
Further, equal protection under the Constitution doesn't depend on whether a characteristic is congenital. The law protects people from discrimination in all areas, including healthcare access. Gender identity and the medical care it necessitates is part of their person-hood, much like the right to marry was fundamental in Loving. Rights aren't limited to "congenital phenotypes" anyway. Most of our rights, such as who marries whom, how to vote, or how we live, are about choices, and the law protects those equally. Discrimination in access to gender-affirming care involves the same equal protection principles.
Calling gender-affirming care "voluntary" further exposes your ignorance. It also ignores the real fact that it is medically NECESSARY for many transgender people. This is recognized by EVERY leading health organization. Tennessee's law singles out transgender youth for exclusion from care, much like Virginia's law singled out interracial couples from marriage. The heart of this issue is the discriminatory impact.