It's interesting cause I see this argument all the time. "same people would just use bombs, handguns, rocks, sticks, knives, etc."I see where we disagree. Guns are not the main variable. If assult rifles are banned, they same people would use bombs, hand guns, or any other means. It's like saying take away guns and people will think twice about killing people which is not true.
We have an idea based on what other countries have done and the results they got.My thing is we don't know that. Simply because it hasn't happened yet. Fair enough.
What is a 'war weapon'? Sounds like some nonsensical Democrat term to try to demonize ARs.
This is what you responded to me with. You literally said 'automatic rifles' are considered 'war weapons'. I responded that the vast majority of citizens cannot obtain an automatic rifle and an ar is NOT automatic. The rifles used in those mass shoots are NOT automatic. Is an 'automatic rifle a weapon of war because they are automatic or because they are rifles?
What would a rifle do at close range that a pistol like a desert eagle wouldn't?
True true.We have an idea based on what other countries have done and the results they got.
but we tend to have this false sense of superiority that what other countries do like better Healthcare systems can never work here
We can at least start by doing nation wide gun buy backs, making it so everybody has to be screened before buying guns, making people that want to buy guns give 3 references, and holding the references responsible if the gun owner does some stupid shyt, I mean, anything is better than just looking at it and saying “it’s too big of a problem now, we just have to deal with the consequences”. I get it, a lot of people have just decided that they like the country the way it is, and the hyper violence is something that they have conditioned themselves to embrace, but life is already pretty fukking hard, don’t you hate to see that the new number one cause of death of a whole age range of children is guns now? I’m a nobody, surrounded by a bunch of other nobodies, so knowing that ain’t shot gonna change, I’m allowed to give my thoughts, even if I’m just yelling into a void. My ideas might not be a solution, but they are better than “let’s not do anything”
There is a big difference. Other countries don't have nut jobs like America. Still, people say that but don't mention the gun violence stats countries had prior to them banning assult rifles.It's interesting cause I see this argument all the time. "same people would just use bombs, handguns, rocks, sticks, knives, etc."
Yet many other Western countries who took this approach to ban assault rifles or severely limit access saw their mass killings and mass gun homicides go way down after.
But of course this is America. We're just so special and so unique that nothing that works in other counties could ever work here
So you can't protect yourself with a handgun?In other words, only the rich and their security teams would own means of protecting themselves.
Better arm yourself before it's too late.
So you can't protect yourself with a handgun?
America is full of Americans. Where are you from?America is full of gun nuts
look at this thread
What is a regular gun? Most murders are done by pistols BY FAR, and they always do things incrementally. After they ban ARs, they are going to ban pistols.