Deion Sanders My Child Support Payments Are TOO DAMN HIGH!

Malfoy

Sweet Thing.
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
680
Reputation
-15
Daps
625
"special diet"???....So theyre eating filet mignon and jumbo prawns every night I guess. $900 a month on uniforms and shoes :wtb: $500 a month on cell phones??....why cant they get on Metro PCS?...$35 a month for everything unlimited. $450 on haircuts... :mindblown: how many haircuts a month are these nikkas getting. Better take them lil nikkas to the spot in the hood and get that $15-20 hookup and why cant her daughter just get some just for me hair treatment shyt? Ole uppity as nikkas

The thing is, if their father (or mom) is living a certain way and they are accustomed to living in a particular manner (private chefs, stylists, in home barbers/beauticians, verizon instead of metro pcs, private schools, etc) they should not be deprived of those things. Granted, it's easy for us to say, "go get a cut in the hood," "slap some perm in there yourself" or whatever else we're used to, but if their father and/or mother is not doing any of those things (cutting corners), why should the children? Further, if they lived this way under Deion's household and he is still financially capable to provide the lifestyle they have grown to know then it should not be interrupted.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
The thing is, if their father (or mom) is living a certain way and they are accustomed to living in a particular manner (private chefs, stylists, in home barbers/beauticians, verizon instead of metro pcs, private schools, etc) they should not be deprived of those things. .

is shes no longer with the guy who provided this lifestyle, then why not? why should they be entitled to this lifestyle she's no longer with the provider? makes no fukking sense to me.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
:wtf:

She has custody of their kids and it costs a whole lot to raise 2 kids in this economy plus shes unemployed with no job skills which deion knew before marrying her. 5k a month aint shyt.

and then black women wonder why black men don't believe in marriage like that. yeah, most of us will never achieve his level of wealth but we see you bytches true colors when money is involved.
 

T'Kuvma Da Unforgettable

My Wallabies attract bowlegged b1tches
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
2,758
Reputation
960
Daps
2,650
is shes no longer with the guy who provided this lifestyle, then why not? why should they be entitled to this lifestyle she's no longer with the provider? makes no fukking sense to me.

just to be fair..if she was the one with the money..deion would be entitled to the same "lifestyle" after the divorce
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
just to be fair..if she was the one with the money..deion would be entitled to the same "lifestyle" after the divorce

how often does that actually happen though? where the woman is making a fukk ton more than the male and he has to pay child support? like 5% of the time.

the entire reason men make more money than women is because most of our money goes towards financing their lifestyle. if they really want equality, how about they start walking away with what they entered the relationship with.

10k a month sounds cool for a few months but yrs? nah, fukk nah. birthing a millionaires baby shouldn't make you wealthy by association.
 

Malfoy

Sweet Thing.
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
680
Reputation
-15
Daps
625
is shes no longer with the guy who provided this lifestyle, then why not? why should they be entitled to this lifestyle she's no longer with the provider? makes no fukking sense to me.
SHE is not who I am referring to and nor is the court in this instance. I said, the children should not be deprived of the lifestyle that they have become accustomed to. Why should the child(ren) 'suffer' because their parents couldn't get along? For the life of me, I cannot and probably will never understand why men find such fault with paying child support. This is something you should and would be doing regardless, for the simple fact that they ARE YOUR CHILDREN.
 

Metta World Movement

Peace and love...to all!!
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
6,417
Reputation
-49
Daps
11,517
:wtf:

She has custody of their kids and it costs a whole lot to raise 2 kids in this economy plus shes unemployed with no job skills which deion knew before marrying her. 5k a month aint shyt.

And just remember, guys - the same thing applies you you regular, low-income ass nikkas as well

You heard her.....that bytch you had kids with and thought you was gonna be with forever? The one who had no job and was supposed to be home taking care of the house and kids while you worked? Once she gets tired of your ass and gets custody of the kids, she gonna need about 5K a month from you to raise them. That should just about cover it....maybe. It's only fair; what do you expect, especially in this economy?

Deion can easily afford that.....so can you :laff:
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
SHE is not who I am referring to and nor is the court in this instance. I said, the children should not be deprived of the lifestyle that they have become accustomed to. Why should the child(ren) 'suffer' because their parents couldn't get along? For the life of me, I cannot and probably will never understand why men find such fault with paying child support. This is something you should and would be doing regardless, for the simple fact that they ARE YOUR CHILDREN.

the children would not be suffering and lets stop pretending like these hoes are using all that money on the kids. it's used to finance their own lifestyle while the kids are still using the same amount of resources as any other child.
 

Malfoy

Sweet Thing.
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
680
Reputation
-15
Daps
625
how often does that actually happen though? where the woman is making a fukk ton more than the male and he has to pay child support? like 5% of the time.

the entire reason men make more money than women is because most of our money goes towards financing their lifestyle. if they really want equality, how about they start walking away with what they entered the relationship with.

10k a month sounds cool for a few months but yrs? nah, fukk nah. birthing a millionaires baby shouldn't make you wealthy by association.

1. Where did you pull that percentage from?
2. She cannot walk away with what she entered the relationship with considering they added human beings to the relationship. Please tell me you can see how that changes things. However, we are not talking about their divorce proceedings. We are discussing CHILD SUPPORT, which is used towards the children. So her walking away with what she came with is a non sequitur to him being ordered to pay X amount of dollars.
3.10k a month for him is probably nothing. She isn't getting wealthy by a percentage of his money being used towards their children's education, and extracurricular activities.

the children would not be suffering and lets stop pretending like these hoes are using all that money on the kids. it's used to finance their own lifestyle while the kids are still using the same amount of resources as any other child.
This is not true (in all instances).
Have you ever attended private school?
Have you ever had a nanny? chef? personal barber? hair stylist? driver/personal car service?
All of these things cost MONEY. He or any parent of means would be providing these things for their children and if he did it before while they lived with him there is no reason why it should stop considering he is still partaking in these luxuries. These are not any "other child(ren)" these are Deion and Pilar Sander's children, and they should be afforded the same lifestyle that their parents have.
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
64,852
Reputation
12,715
Daps
90,898
Reppin
CHICAGO
marriage is a fifty/fifty split corporation.
if you marry a woman who does not create a stream of revenue in said corporation.

allowing her to bring zero percent to your one hundred percent.

then you are playing the game all wrong.

if a woman can not create a corporation with you.
you do not marry her, period.

kids are not a corporation.

so, if you get married and kids are the only other thing present besides your job.

kids and your day job are not a stream of revenue.

then, you will get taken.
all because you agreed to it.
it is as simple as that.



art barr

former illinois state divorce attorney certification exam manager
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
64,852
Reputation
12,715
Daps
90,898
Reppin
CHICAGO
nikkaz need to kill that,..

bae,..we gon make our own definition of marriage, bullshyt.
when the engaged couple goes to city hall and applies for a marriage license.
when you say that bullshyt.

ol' girl is like,....
good only a little bit longer of this bytchass simp nikka before i get the dough!!

art barr

former illinois divorce attorney certification exam manager
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
1. Where did you pull that percentage from?
2. She cannot walk away with what she entered the relationship with considering they added human beings to the relationship. Please tell me you can see how that changes things. However, we are not talking about their divorce proceedings. We are discussing CHILD SUPPORT, which is used towards the children. So her walking away with what she came with is a non sequitur to him being ordered to pay X amount of dollars.
3.10k a month for him is probably nothing. She isn't getting wealthy by a percentage of his money being used towards their children's education, and extracurricular activities.


This is not true (in all instances).
Have you ever attended private school?
Have you ever had a nanny? chef? personal barber? hair stylist? driver/personal car service?
All of these things cost MONEY. He or any parent of means would be providing these things for their children and if he did it before while they lived with him then there is no reason why it should stop considering he is still partaking in these luxuries. These are not any "other child(ren)" these are Deion and Pilar Sander's children, and they should be afforded the same lifestyle that their parents have.

yes, i attended private school. no, i didnt have a nanny, chef, or personal barber. why should any other child need these things? do you think the hoe cooking her childrens food and getting a 20 dollar haircut is outside the realm of possibility?>

there is no justification for these gold digging women to receive lottery style payouts for having kids to wealthy men. it also sends the wrong message to both gender. it makes men believe the sanctity of marriage is bullshyt, and it makes women believe they're entitled to a mans earnings just for sleeping with him and birthing his children.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
nikkaz need to kill that,..

bae,..we gon make our own definition of marriage, bullshyt.
when the engaged couple goes to city hall and applies for a marriage license.
when you say that bullshyt.

ol' girl is like,....
good only a little bit longer of this bytchass simp nikka before i get the dough!!

art barr

former illinois divorce attorney certification exam manager

exactly

dumb ass nikkas thinking they've found the right one forever. while these evil ass creatures known as women are strictly thinking about the payout they'll receive in the divorce.
 

Malfoy

Sweet Thing.
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
680
Reputation
-15
Daps
625
yes, i attended private school. no, i didnt have a nanny, chef, or personal barber. why should any other child need these things? do you think the hoe cooking her childrens food and getting a 20 dollar haircut is outside the realm of possibility?>

there is no justification for these gold digging women to receive lottery style payouts for having kids to wealthy men. it also sends the wrong message to both gender. it makes men believe the sanctity of marriage is bullshyt, and it makes women believe they're entitled to a mans earnings just for sleeping with him and birthing his children.
If this thread was about divorce settlements, I would be more inclined to agree with you. Alas, it is not. Child support is not a get rich quick scheme. If this money isn't used for the children, and their schooling or whatever was listed by the attorneys he can sue her. I'm sure the school has receipts, cell phone bills have summaries, nannies, drivers, stylists etc all have salaries that have to be paid.

Now, the reason why I asked if you had any of those things is because THEY DO AND HAVE BEEN ACCUSTOMED to all of those things. So, because they are used to having all of those things afforded to them by their parents it would be negligent for them to be cut off out of spite. If the mother or father has never cooked a meal in their natural born life, and they're (children) used to either nannies or chefs preparing their meals, then that has to be upheld. It should not stop because their parents have decided to part ways.
 
Top