Dec 12 - The Universe Is A Hologram!!!???

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,115
Reppin
The Deep State
I don't have to assert anything,
uh...yeah. You do.

you've already said you believe that materialism/neuroscience is the way.
Its what the evidence suggests, not that its "inherently" the way.

It's not speculative to say that the human brain is restricted by resonance, no?
You have this REAL problem with epistemology i'm noticing.

The lack of evidence is not evidence of absence. Thats not how this shyt works.

There is no evidence such a concept is true, HOWEVER it doesn't mean its not true either. Its just merely an unsupported concept.

If it's all anatomy then we should be able to alter and create a better built brain, no?
flawed premise
Or are you going to dismiss minds far greater than yours?
you claim they're far greater yet you can't help yourself from jumping to foregone conclusions...like the anxious fool you have no problem pretending to be.

You really can't be that stupid.

Either you're all in or shut the fukk up.
...and other remedial comments from @Poitier's new docu-drama. :banderas:
The mental gymnastics you try to use when Professor so and so hasn't supplied you with the answer is fukking amazing
the fukk are you talking about?


I don't speak on things I don't know. Thats why I have no problem admitting the limit of what I've been exposed to or have learned...you on the other hand...:mjpls:

Its conjecture city in your neck of the woods :rudy:[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,115
Reppin
The Deep State
There's nothing wrong with admitting others are less knowledgeable than you on a subject but to straight up call them simpletons because of that is rude, I don't mind discussing and learning new things but I can see you don't want to teach anyone, just berate them for their ignorance.
You ARE a simpleton if you are willing to sit here and dismiss the subtle neuroscience that effectively wiping out psychology in lieu of perpetuating this almost pseudoscientific and magic assertion that you experienced an out of body experience.

Just a simple search would reveal that no such thing has ever been demonstrated to have occurred.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,115
Reppin
The Deep State
I honestly don't think he means well, I think he feels good berating people simply because he has more knowledge than them. Anyone who meant well would be about teaching, not berating.
You damn right I don't "mean well"

Cause at this point you're being stubborn in clinging to a notion in which is ENTIRELY unfeasible, considering all that we know about the nature of how things work...but go ahead. Whatever makes you wanna believe in ridiculous concepts like "spirituality" or "external consciousness" or whatever.

Deepak Chopra yearns for lesser minds to pimp.

if you're mad, its because you haven't realized how much I actually care that you figure this shyt out.
...for your own good.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,115
Reppin
The Deep State
I feel you mean well with these back and forths but you come off as a dikk. Slow it down.
...I don't care.

I reach a point where I just stop arguing with modern-day knuckle draggers and pull them into 2014 kicking and screaming.

I don't capitulate to intellectual terrorists.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,369
uh...yeah. You do.

Its what the evidence suggests, not that its "inherently" the way.

You have this REAL problem with epistemology i'm noticing.

The lack of evidence is not evidence of absence. Thats not how this shyt works.

There is no evidence such a concept is true, HOWEVER it doesn't mean its not true either. Its just merely an unsupported concept.

flawed premise

You're so pathetic. You make an excellent foot soldier, however:laff::laff::laff::laff::laff:
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,369
This essentially is in line with what was stated in the Quran almost 1,500 years ago.




The Quran states that there's 7 layers/dimensions of the Universe. We reside in the first one, essentially meaning the 3rd dimension, and there's six more superimposed above us (plus time?, which would make it 10 total).

The Jinn reside in the layer just above ours, or "the 4th dimension". They live here on Earth with us, however we're unable to see them, because they're located in a different dimension. Occasionally, it is said that Jinn have the ability to travel down to the 3rd dimension and be seen by humans.


As far as the universe being 2d and just a hologram:



which is in line with the Cosmic/Big Crunch theory, hypothesizing that the Universe will eventually end by collapsing or folding onto itself. Also, the heavens being rolled up like a scroll would support the 2d hypothesis

:camby:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,115
Reppin
The Deep State
How so homie? everything that we know exist on this plant was created,
You say created as if two hands did it.

We've demonstrated how things can come together with little "consciousness" at all.

The desire to anthropomorphize things is a dangerous one and a massively fallacious presupposition you should look to curb.

Stop supposing something did anything...and rather come to understand how things work.

IF we find that something or someone was responsible for it, then we can include it.

Theres a reason why so many theories don't include a god(s). its not that they're looking to dismiss it, but rather, it never comes up.

whether that be by humans or the planet earth creating us and all the living organisms on it. So at one point humans didn't exist then the earth whether consciously or unconsciously created us.
so...whats your point?
hmmmmmmmm i'm no even religious but this comes off like a creationist argument lol :yeshrug: But yea all the things we created we believed in them first then made them a reality. But I take it your talking about biological things not existing and not inanimate objects?

I don't understand what you're talking about.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,665
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,115
Reppin
The Deep State
This essentially is in line with what was stated in the Quran almost 1,500 years ago.




The Quran states that there's 7 layers/dimensions of the Universe. We reside in the first one, essentially meaning the 3rd dimension, and there's six more superimposed above us (plus time?, which would make it 10 total).

The Jinn reside in the layer just above ours, or "the 4th dimension". They live here on Earth with us, however we're unable to see them, because they're located in a different dimension. Occasionally, it is said that Jinn have the ability to travel down to the 3rd dimension and be seen by humans.


As far as the universe being 2d and just a hologram:



which is in line with the Cosmic/Big Crunch theory, hypothesizing that the Universe will eventually end by collapsing or folding onto itself. Also, the heavens being rolled up like a scroll would support the 2d hypothesis

I can't blame you. Religious apologists (read: dumbasses) like yourself wouldn't be in business if you couldn't find new ways to post-hoc ergo propter hoc your religious texts, you'd be ACTUALLY living in that mosque.

But you're wrong so keep trolling.
 

USSInsiders

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,302
Reputation
2,405
Daps
31,294
Reppin
NULL
2v4o.jpg

A team of physicists has provided some of the clearest evidence yet that our Universe could be just one big projection.

In 1997, theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena proposed that an audacious model of the Universe in which gravity arises from infinitesimally thin, vibrating strings could be reinterpreted in terms of well-established physics. The mathematically intricate world of strings, which exist in nine dimensions of space plus one of time, would be merely a hologram: the real action would play out in a simpler, flatter cosmos where there is no gravity.

Maldacena's idea thrilled physicists because it offered a way to put the popular but still unproven theory of strings on solid footing — and because it solved apparent inconsistencies between quantum physics and Einstein's theory of gravity. It provided physicists with a mathematical Rosetta stone, a 'duality', that allowed them to translate back and forth between the two languages, and solve problems in one model that seemed intractable in the other and vice versa. But although the validity of Maldacena's ideas has pretty much been taken for granted ever since, a rigorous proof has been elusive.

In two papers posted on the arXiv repository, Yoshifumi Hyakutake of Ibaraki University in Japan and his colleagues now provide, if not an actual proof, at least compelling evidence that Maldacena’s conjecture is true.

In one paper, Hyakutake computes the internal energy of a black hole, the position of its event horizon (the boundary between the black hole and the rest of the Universe), its entropy and other properties based on the predictions of string theory as well as the effects of so-called virtual particles that continuously pop into and out of existence. In the other, he and his collaborators calculate the internal energy of the corresponding lower-dimensional cosmos with no gravity. The two computer calculations match.

“It seems to be a correct computation,” says Maldacena, who is now at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and who did not contribute to the team's work.

The findings “are an interesting way to test many ideas in quantum gravity and string theory”, Maldacena adds. The two papers, he notes, are the culmination of a series of articles contributed by the Japanese team over the past few years. “The whole sequence of papers is very nice because it tests the dual [nature of the universes] in regimes where there are no analytic tests.”

“They have numerically confirmed, perhaps for the first time, something we were fairly sure had to be true, but was still a conjecture — namely that the thermodynamics of certain black holes can be reproduced from a lower-dimensional universe,” says Leonard Susskind, a theoretical physicist at Stanford University in California who was among the first theoreticians to explore the idea of holographic universes.

Neither of the model universes explored by the Japanese team resembles our own, Maldacena notes. The cosmos with a black hole has ten dimensions, with eight of them forming an eight-dimensional sphere. The lower-dimensional, gravity-free one has but a single dimension, and its menagerie of quantum particles resembles a group of idealized springs, or harmonic oscillators, attached to one another.

Nevertheless, says Maldacena, the numerical proof that these two seemingly disparate worlds are actually identical gives hope that the gravitational properties of our Universe can one day be explained by a simpler cosmos purely in terms of quantum theory.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/11/universe-hologram-physicists_n_4428359.html

So we really might be living in the matrix!!! :lupe:

:wow: #thedualities #newrules
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,369
I can't blame you. Religious apologists (read: dumbasses) like yourself wouldn't be in business if you couldn't find new ways to post-hoc ergo propter hoc your religious texts, you'd be ACTUALLY living in that mosque.

But you're wrong so keep trolling.

go to sleep, you mime. that's enough for you, parrot. simon says goodnite:heh:
 
Top