put the cocaine down
he's older than rj and averaged 6 points as a rookie. the moment he faced nba athleticism and length he looked pretty average in the summer league
him trying moves that wouldnt work against nba competition means nothing to me.
Him being a 3&D++ guy is optimal. you making these grandiose statements cause rjs game isnt pretty enough to you is gross.
rj will improve with a real point guard. hell, he looked good with any point guard on the court that had a pulse and had a semblance of knowing what they were doing. rose, quickley...it'll only get better from here
Grimes has the stroke
![dame :dame: :dame:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/dame2.png)
of a perennial 40% 3PT and can thrive off-ball. RJ is a below average shooter.
Grimes has the better handle with a quick twitch decisiveness and ability to be low and elusive, hang dribble or hesi into the pull up as opposed to RJ who is usually stiff and upright, loose handler, with a high dribble and struggles to blow by defenders when he can't overpower them with his strength. Grimes footwork and fundamentals are just flat out better it is not debatable.
Not many attempts but Grimes has dare I say more craft around the basket and seemed to have finished every lay-up attempt in traffic we have seen him take meanwhile Barrett is one of the worst finishers in the game.
Grimes was our best perimeter defender last season and is better than RJ on D especially off-ball.
If Grimes tops out as a 3&D player who can attack closeouts and be a secondary-tertiary playmaker that would already bring more impact than whatever the hell it is RJ is bringing to the table.
A Klay or Bane type player>>mini Julius Randle
![mjlit :mjlit: :mjlit:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/mjlit2.png)