@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited, why do you condone slavery in the bible?

DMGAINGREEN

Transitioning from Sec 8 to tha Sky scrapes
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Messages
6,732
Reputation
3,710
Daps
35,614
Reppin
The Bronx
They WERE getting beaten and raped.

WTF are you talking about?

Natural human rights are a relatively new invention.

They treated strangers like dogshyt
Where in the bible does it state that they were getting raped ?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,623
Reputation
-34,219
Daps
615,740
Reppin
The Deep State

resurrection

By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
5,402
Reputation
-340
Daps
16,881
Reppin
Dallas, TX
Leviticus 25:44-46
God said:
44 Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves.45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property.46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

Exodus 21:7-11
God said:
7 If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as male servants do.8 If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself, he must let her be redeemed. He has no right to sell her to foreigners, because he has broken faith with her.9 If he selects her for his son, he must grant her the rights of a daughter.10 If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights. 11 If he does not provide her with these three things, she is to go free, without any payment of money.

Exodus 21:20-21
God said:
20 Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result,21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

Cool stuff there, guys @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited @DMGAINGREEN @Michael9100
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
resurrection said:
Leviticus 25:44-46

Exodus 21:7-11


Exodus 21:20-21


Cool stuff there, guys

Yeah, except Christians don't follow Mosaic Law. It 'expired' (for them) when Jesus was executed. That's the meaning behind this.......

John 19:30

When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

:snooze:
 

QamYasharahla

All Star
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
3,130
Reputation
-320
Daps
7,154
Notice his use of the term 'your'......as if his ancestors aren't from Africa?

:mjpls:


61675534.jpg
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Napoleon said:
Read this fukking twitter account:

https://twitter.com/afamhistfail

You are perpetuating the SAME things that ignorant people have about slavery

No, I'm actually posting what was understood by the Department of Labor in 1965 and comparing it to legal documents from the Ancient Near Eastern civilizations of Akkad, Assyria, Ugarit, Babylon, etc.

You, on the other hand, are being destroyed in your own thread......AGAIN!

R.I.F.

:snooze:
 

Ghost_In_A_Shell

Talk No Jutsu
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,746
Reputation
760
Daps
5,641
Concerning Exodus 21-20:

"The text does not condone the beating of the slave at all. Rather, the text is describing what the punishment is *for* beating one’s slave to death. That is, the text actually *condemns* beating a slave to death. In the one case, the slave owner is punished by being put to death. In the other case, which is an unintentional death by beating, the slave owner is punished in terms of his own financial loss from having beaten his slave to death. The implication is that he did not intend to kill his slave, but was still wrong in beating the slave. Otherwise there would be no mention of punishment in either case. But as it is, there is a punishment in both cases here for beating a slave to death. In the first case of intentionally beating a slave to death, the slave owner is likewise to be put to death. In the second case of unintentionally beating a slave to death, the slave owner’s own foolish financial loss serves as his punishment."
http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-slavery.html



Also keep in mind these verses: Deuteronomy 15:12-15; Colossians 4:1; and Ephesians 6:9.....

There is/was a way to treat a slave and it is not like an animal...


the point is that it still had slavery and it does not say that it is out right wrong
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,623
Reputation
-34,219
Daps
615,740
Reppin
The Deep State
No, I'm actually posting what was understood by the Department of Labor in 1965 and comparing it to legal documents from the Ancient Near Eastern civilizations of Akkad, Assyria, Ugarit, Babylon, etc.

You, on the other hand, are being destroyed in your own thread......AGAIN!

R.I.F.

:snooze:
Just say you condone slavery and be done with it.

Referring to white supremacist reviews of ancient documents of SLAVES isn't helping you
 
Top