You know you don't have to name your informant until the case goes to trial, and even then, there are ways to get around it if the Prosecution wants to. This shyt is a dirty game on both sides of the lawWhere’s the paper work my dude ?? Not something pacs cousin said actul proof ?? .... pac didn’t loose respect for jack he distanced himself from him due to the rape case thinking it was shady he got his case separated from pacs ...had him and jack went in the same trial there would be no issue ... people forget jack was a hardened criminal compared to pac any gun case etc they would have thrown the book at jack that’s why he got his case separated.....my Belief is that the judge threw the book at pac cause he had thumbing his nose at the law and maybe due to the cop shooting he got off with yeah he was in the right but law enforcement is shady at times as we all see present times ...
A snitch is not the same thing as an informant. To be a snitch, you had to tell on someone you was down with. An informant just gives the police information, and gets paid, they don't have to tell you who told them, that's why it's called "confidential informant". You can find out using common sense, and reading the discovery, but it's still not actual proof.