ogc163
Superstar
No he’s making a class reductionist argument. He is burying it in his article and making it for different reasons other than a Marxist would.
Nah, he's not.
No he’s making a class reductionist argument. He is burying it in his article and making it for different reasons other than a Marxist would.
Nah, he's not.
Nowhere does he imply that class matters more than race. Instead he’s implying that we assume that race is a catch-all that allows one to account for the experiences of various people from different socioeconomic backgrounds. We ask for different images of black people on TV but rarely do we consider if the black person crafting that story had the range and understanding of blackness to do it. That’s why you get shows like dear white peoples that sound like they were drafting using black Twitter quotes. In other words, people with no connection to that type of blackness are taking advantage without in anyway empowering those whose stories they are telling. This isn’t always true but it’s true enough.From the prospective of a race first person he is making a “class reductionist” argument. He is just using the entertainment industry to do it. I read the article get what he is trying to say and understand that socialists like this kind of stuff. But, I bet if you asked him does a black person’s class matter more than than his race in the USA he would say yes.
Don’t get me wrong “class reductionist” and “race reductionist” terms are really just insults that people throw at each other nowadays so
Then why are you using it?Don’t get me wrong “class reductionist” and “race reductionist” terms are really just insults that people throw at each other nowadays so
Then why are you using it?
Nowhere does he imply that class matters more than race. Instead he’s implying that we assume that race is a catch-all that allows one to account for the experiences of various people from different socioeconomic backgrounds. We ask for different images of black people on TV but rarely do we consider if the black person crafting that story had the range and understanding of blackness to do it. That’s why you get shows like dear white peoples that sound like they were drafting using black Twitter quotes. In other words, people with no connection to that type of blackness are taking advantage without in anyway empowering those whose stories they are telling. This isn’t always true but it’s true enough.
dis you?It was used by an above poster. I not trying to call the dude names but his article is making a class reductionist argument. You got to know what to look for.
No he’s making a class reductionist argument. He is burying it in his article and making it for different reasons other than a Marxist would.
He is saying both because it is a fact.You right he was directly saying the above in his article. But reread his paragraph on mass incarceration and his criticism Ta Nehisi Coates. He doesn’t directly say it but he is implying that class plays bigger role in mass incarceration than white supremacy.
Eighty percent of Black people imprisoned in the U.S. hail from poverty, meaning that 8 out of every 10 Black prisoners in the U.S. are harvested from one class of Black Americans: the class that George Floyd belonged to. This also means that the Black middle- and upper- classes combined make up just 20 percent of Black prisoners.
dis you?
The article is about black people.Breh I said he is making a class reductionist argument. I’m not calling him an idiot or anything. A lot of black leftists, conservatives and academics are making class reductionist arguments these days. They each have their own reasons.
The article is about black people.
People like throwing around "class reductionist" because they don't want to acknowledge poor people, especially poor black people. You are chatting shyte.
dis you?
He is saying both because it is a fact.
Look at what you just wrote and think about what the article is saying.It’s a fact because Mass Incarnation of poor black people was the easiest way lockup the most black.
Look at what you just wrote and think about what the article is saying.
Now think about your use of class reduction and try and square that with your statements in this thread.
If 80% of the black people in prison are poor, then who else could it be targeting? The number is similar for other racial groups too.What I’m saying is mass incarceration was never aimed at an economic class it was aimed at the black community as a whole and it’s application was based on race.
You're an idiotFrom the prospective of a race first person he is making a “class reductionist” argument. He is just using the entertainment industry to do it. I read the article get what he is trying to say and understand that socialists like this kind of stuff. But, I bet if you asked him does a black person’s class matter more than than his race in the USA he would say yes.
Don’t get me wrong “class reductionist” and “race reductionist” terms are really just insults that people throw at each other nowadays so
its worse that he's playing footsie with actual right wing activists and hoping no one notices.From the prospective of a race first person he is making a “class reductionist” argument. He is just using the entertainment industry to do it. I read the article get what he is trying to say and understand that socialists like this kind of stuff. But, I bet if you asked him does a black person’s class matter more than than his race in the USA he would say yes.
Don’t get me wrong “class reductionist” and “race reductionist” terms are really just insults that people throw at each other nowadays so