Creh smokes another creh on cam

[Yessir_Araphat]

“I have always been a ‘back the blue’ supporter…until now.”

shut the fukk up
Now it’s a problem, huh??

 

[CBalla]

Yall are conflating the event. You must unravel this shooting piece by piece to obtain when and if justification for shooting happened and if the shooter broke the law prior.

1. Victim was there to pick up his child as agreed in custody papers.

Any laws broken there or justification to shoot him?

2. Victim got into verbal exchange with the child's mother due to child not being there.

Is it justifiable to shoot him now?

3. Victim gets into verbal exchange with wife's boyfriend. No physical altercation. The shooter asks him to leave the property to which the victim refuses.

Is it justifiable to shoot him now? This is key. Can you shoot someone for not leaving your property?

4. Shooter retrieves a rifle and again asks victim to leave? Victim refuses and aggressively enters the shooters space.

Is it within the law to now shoot him? Can you shoot an unarmed person for threatening to take a weapon you introduced and using it on you? This maybe the key. There is a size difference.

5. Shooter fires a warning shot at the feet of the victim.

If the events from #4 aren't within guidelines for self defense Kyle should be cooked here as this MAY be the first illegal action. Warning shots are not allowable in self defense.

6. After the warning shot, victim attempts to disarm Kyle.

This hinges between assault and the victim attempting self defense. If the victim has not committed any other illegal actions, he has a claim to self defense. Kyle shot at his feet.

7. Kyle retains his weapon after being tossed about. From about 10 ft away he raises his rifle and fires two shots dropping the victim..

From Kyle's perspective, the victim has just physically assaulted him by trying to take his gun.

The question is, who committed the illegal act first. Was it the victim by refusing to leave when asked? And if it is illegal, did it give the right to shoot?

If the refusal to leave isn't illegal and a green light to shoot, was the verbal altercation sufficient? Is it legal to claim self defense due to verbal altercation? Is it legal to shoot due to someone being in your face in a aggressive nature? Taking into account size difference.

Once past this, the biggest issue is the shot fired (warning shot) at the victims feet. Not only does the introduction of a gun bring in his claim for self defense. But a warning shot definitely does.

be interesting to see how it plays out. Let's see how connected Kyle is and if his girlfriend offers some head booty and cock to the State Attorney .

Stand Your Ground could possibly come into play


possibly

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Already did. Like others have said, you are one of those who argue just to argue, even when you have been refuted. Just because you don't know or understand another states laws doesn't mean you are correct.
Always thought you were a terrible poster and you've proven it. Won't reply again to you

Man fukk what you think and your entire thought process… you ain’t enough..

You gotta come online and pretend you got some sense cause you see thru as fukk….It was a dumb post and you ain’t, can’t, won’t refute my reply…

And you hollering this your last “reply” to me..

It’s only your last reply because you got coward type tendencies just like that bytch Kyle, and that’s why it’s easy for you to empathize…

 

[Dzali OG]

Stand Your Ground could possibly come into play


possibly

Yeah but on who's part?

My question is, warning shots legal in Texas?

 

[CBalla]

Yeah but on who's part?

My question is, warning shots legal in Texas?

defense might argue that it wasnt a warning shot

 

[jilla82]

Was backing the blue til it happened to a white man

White people so full of shyt man

yall dudes dumb as hell with this

it happened to her

same reason why every other thread on here is about black people...
...yall never post shyt about other groups that have nothing to do with black folks

thats how people are

 

[Playaz Eyez]

yall dudes dumb as hell with this

it happened to her

same reason why every other thread on here is about black people...
...yall never post shyt about other groups that have nothing to do with black folks

thats how people are

Pretty sure that’s not what any of those posters that responded were alluding to. That post is a woman who clearly had no problem watching and accepting black people being wronged by the police for ages but know suddenly feels wronged since it happened to her (which is actually debatable, the shooter didn’t have to go back inside to get his gun, but the victim also states on the property, got in the guy’s face, witnesses a warning shot from the shooter, AND was grabbing the gun). She’s a full on tone deaf hypocrite.

 

[Mʀ2ᴋDᴇᴇᴢ]

yall dudes dumb as hell with this

it happened to her

same reason why every other thread on here is about black people...
...yall never post shyt about other groups that have nothing to do with black folks

thats how people are

I can’t front, post is confusing to me breh

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Just because you don't know or understand another states laws doesn't mean you are correct.

I said that his bytch ass is probably gonna walk because of Texas law you born insecure chump….

But there is a real world that people live in outside of Texas……. where the laws differ, and that’s fact

 

[jilla82]

Pretty sure that’s not what any of those posters that responded were alluding to. That post is a woman who clearly had no problem watching and accepting black people being wronged by the police for ages but know suddenly feels wronged since it happened to her (which is actually debatable, the shooter didn’t have to go back inside to get his gun, but the victim also states on the property, got in the guy’s face, witnesses a warning shot from the shooter, AND was grabbing the gun). She’s a full on tone deaf hypocrite.

nothing is real until you feel it

thats life and how people are

a lot of the modern cases where "black people were wronged" also have gray area in them
if you can say this case is debatable...you can say Eric Garner is debatable because he shouldnt have resisted arrest

everybody can play that game

 

[Another Man]

You just convicted the cac.

Warning shots are not part of self defense.

You just convicted the cac.

Warning shots are not part of self defense.

I dont even think it was a warning shot, more like an accidental discharge cuz dude was trying to wrestle it from him

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

nothing is real until you feel it

thats life and how people are

Pretty much

 

[Another Man]

aint nobody doin all that back and fifth with other men and tussling and shyt, concealed carry is very real


he tried to fight for the gun and ended up fighting for his life

Nah, these nikkas been playing too many video games or watching too much anime and movies and shyt. Apparently dude was supposed to challenge him to fisticuffs like street fighter as he was being threatened on his own property
Why even own guns in the first place then?

 

[Dzali OG]

defense might argue that it wasnt a warning shot

That's what they had best do lol.

 

[FreedMind]

I thought the title said creh smokes another creh on cnn