How can you "specifically" quote a law that DOES NOT APPLY as if it does?
The site you quoted said you have to be in the structure AND had to have forced your way into the structure or be an immediate threat to life or property. Not just have been asked to leave.
Why are you repeatedly ignoring actual case law and just trying to make shyt up as you go along?
What does "on their property" have jack shyt to do with it when we already proved Castle Doctrine doesn't apply?
And talking shyt to someone is not reasonable cause to kill them. Remember when everyone said that Makiya Bryant had the right to attack the girls who were yelling threats on her property? Nah, she's dead because she went at them, it didn't matter that it was her property. If this guy gets off it's because he's white and connected.
Or else show me all the legal experts who defended Makiya Bryant. YOU didn't even defend her, YOU were one of the ones justifying the cop for killing her even though she was on her own property and the people she attacked had been screaming threats.