Creh smokes another creh on cam

[Absolut]

Getting in someone's face and trying to take their weapon away from the property owner while trespassing will get your stupid ass shot

“Quote the law” like he’s matlock when he’s seen numerous high profile death trials not convict for shooting someone, with far more grey area than this one. Clown shyt.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Okay and this lawyer says something different, I bet my lawyer will beat yours in Court, and that's why this guy hasn't been arrested
When Is It Legal to Shoot Someone in Texas? The Castle Doctrine (houston-criminalattorney.com)
ed

The Castle Doctrine gets its name from the philosophy that everyone is the King or Queen in his or her own home. In other words, you shouldn’t have to flee your property because of an intruder. The Texas Penal Code designates certain areas under the protection of the Castle Doctrine: your home, vehicle, and workplace.

In your home, Texas law assumes that you’re justified in using force to defend yourself against intruders. You get immunity under this presumption given a certain set of circumstances

Oh wow, you're a BIG fukking liar now. Your own link says you were wrong and you purposely didn't quote the very next line:



The Castle Doctrine gets its name from the philosophy that everyone is the King or Queen in his or her own home. In other words, you shouldn’t have to flee your property because of an intruder. The Texas Penal Code designates certain areas under the protection of the Castle Doctrine: your home, vehicle, and workplace.

In your home, Texas law assumes that you’re justified in using force to defend yourself against intruders. You get immunity under this presumption given a certain set of circumstances:

• An intruder entered unlawfully and with force
• An individual removes or attempts to remove you from your castle with force

In Texas, a “castle” defines three places: an “occupied habitation,” “occupied vehicle,” and place of employment.

The term “occupied habitation” is perhaps the most important in the Castle Doctrine. According to Texas law, your occupied habitation is limited. The Texas Penal Code defines habitation as:

“…a structure or vehicle adapted for the overnight accommodation of persons; and includes each separately secured or occupied portion of the structure or vehicle; and each structure appurtenant to or connected with the structure or vehicle.”

In other words, this limits the places where you can use deadly force—a sticking point for many who seek to use the Castle Doctrine to protect their families.



Your own link EXPLICITLY says that the "Castle Doctrine" doesn't apply until he actually enters the actual structure with force and attempts to remove the occupant with force. Not just for being on the property.

 

[Darealtwo1]

You wanna see that woman's nature? Look at her reaction to her son's dad being killed. Cold and indifferent.

You can tell her and Kyle have talked about this before.

"If I ever get the chance to legally kill him I will honey"

She's wanted him dead for some time now.

 

[Box Factory]

You’re right. It’s not a discussion. It’s self defense

If it's considered self defense, that really just hammers home my point that it's a broken and disgusting society.

It's an infantile and dishonest thought process to twist what happened there into some justified act


p*ssy and morally bankrupt

 

[GunRanger]

Warning shots are illegal even in pro gun states which it seems that first shot was

 

[The God Poster]

Oh wow, you're a BIG fukking liar now. Your own link says you were wrong and you purposely didn't quote the very next line:



The Castle Doctrine gets its name from the philosophy that everyone is the King or Queen in his or her own home. In other words, you shouldn’t have to flee your property because of an intruder. The Texas Penal Code designates certain areas under the protection of the Castle Doctrine: your home, vehicle, and workplace.

In your home, Texas law assumes that you’re justified in using force to defend yourself against intruders. You get immunity under this presumption given a certain set of circumstances:

• An intruder entered unlawfully and with force
• An individual removes or attempts to remove you from your castle with force

In Texas, a “castle” defines three places: an “occupied habitation,” “occupied vehicle,” and place of employment.

The term “occupied habitation” is perhaps the most important in the Castle Doctrine. According to Texas law, your occupied habitation is limited. The Texas Penal Code defines habitation as:

“…a structure or vehicle adapted for the overnight accommodation of persons; and includes each separately secured or occupied portion of the structure or vehicle; and each structure appurtenant to or connected with the structure or vehicle.”

In other words, this limits the places where you can use deadly force—a sticking point for many who seek to use the Castle Doctrine to protect their families.



Your own link EXPLICITLY says that the "Castle Doctrine" doesn't apply until he actually enters the actual structure with force and attempts to remove the occupant with force. Not just for being on the property.

You bout to get cussed & out & called everything but ya name

 

[Absolut]

If it's considered self defense, that really just hammers home my point that it's a broken and disgusting society.

It's an infantile and dishonest thought process to twist what happened there into some justified act


p*ssy and morally bankrupt

There’s no if. He made a direct death threat on someone else’s property. An nba player was killed in that same state for kicking a door down at a wrong apartment. Don’t do that shyt and expect to live

 

[Master Teacher]

Oh wow, you're a BIG fukking liar now. Your own link says you were wrong and you purposely didn't quote the very next line:

The Castle Doctrine gets its name from the philosophy that everyone is the King or Queen in his or her own home. In other words, you shouldn’t have to flee your property because of an intruder. The Texas Penal Code designates certain areas under the protection of the Castle Doctrine: your home, vehicle, and workplace.

In your home, Texas law assumes that you’re justified in using force to defend yourself against intruders. You get immunity under this presumption given a certain set of circumstances:

• An intruder entered unlawfully and with force
• An individual removes or attempts to remove you from your castle with force

In Texas, a “castle” defines three places: an “occupied habitation,” “occupied vehicle,” and place of employment.
The term “occupied habitation” is perhaps the most important in the Castle Doctrine. According to Texas law, your occupied habitation is limited. The Texas Penal Code defines habitation as:

“…a structure or vehicle adapted for the overnight accommodation of persons; and includes each separately secured or occupied portion of the structure or vehicle; and each structure appurtenant to or connected with the structure or vehicle.”

In other words, this limits the places where you can use deadly force—a sticking point for many who seek to use the Castle Doctrine to protect their families.



Your own link EXPLICITLY says that the "Castle Doctrine" doesn't apply until he actually enters the actual structure with force. Not just for being on the property.

Once again the argument you can't kill somebody in your home that won't leave, that's what you said I was talking specifically about that case to prove that point dumb ass

secondly, The GUY GOT IN HIS FACE AND THREATEN HIM, and SAID HE WOULD TAKE THE GUN FROM HIM, THEN TRIED TO DO IT

He didn't just come outside and start blasting him he didn't even had the gun pointing at him he was just brandishing it which is legal to do on your property

If the guy never got aggressive he never would've got shot, but he did and that's why he's not being arrested

dumb ass

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

Probably low key premeditated

 

[Box Factory]

There’s no if. He made a direct death threat on someone else’s property. An nba player was killed in that same state for kicking a door down at a wrong apartment. Don’t do that shyt and expect to live

You're a broken and mentally ill product of a broken and rotten society

You're a bad person at your core

 

[Absolut]

You're a broken and mentally ill product of a broken and rotten society

You're a bad person at your core

I’m also alive, because I respect property boundaries and personal space.

 

[Box Factory]

I’m also alive, because I respect property boundaries and personal space.

That's a pretty low level to be operating on, but ok.

 

[Absolut]

The GUY GOT IN HIS FACE AND THREATEN HIM, and SAID HE WOULD TAKE THE GUN FROM HIM, THEN TRIED TO DO IT

It’s all moot after this. Which is why he’s ignoring it.

 

[Absolut]

That's a pretty low level to be operating on, but ok.

The guy in the video looks to be operating at a level 6 feet lower. Wonder how that’s going for him

 

[Master Teacher]

It’s all moot after this. Which is why he’s ignoring it.

Because he's a liar, he gonna call me a liar, when this fool said the guy fired a shot first, when the first shot is even on video, and before the view is block you can see the guy reaching for the gun several seconds before the first shot is even heard, plus he ran up on him as soon as he came outside with the gun amped up, if he was just standing there talking calm the situation wouldn't have gotten to that point but he wanted to flex