Creh smokes another creh on cam

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,368
Reputation
520
Daps
54,272
Reppin
Las Vegas
The fact that you have to lie and say "defending your home" as if that's what happened in the video is very telling

You know you can't on a moral level defend this so you resort to lies and corny jokes

You're a bad actor :manny:
It’s easily defended. It’s his property. That’s all that needs to be said. Get in someone’s face and make threats on their property at your own risk. I enjoy my body parts being intact, so I don’t do that. Others may like to, and you end up a chalk line on someone’s porch
 

KingFreeman

Barely-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Messages
3,018
Reputation
410
Daps
9,961
Reppin
the 254
How would being strapped have helped in any of those cases?

Third guy who went up against Rittenhouse was strapped, still died. Pregnant lady was strapped, still died. If this guy had reached for the strap the guy with the AR-15 would have just fired that much faster.

Guns aren't defensive weapons. If the guy in front of you wants to shoot, then he's just gonna shoot that much faster when he sees the gun come out. If someone points a gun at you and then gives you the time to get your own piece out and fire first then he wasn't going to fire in the first place. Guns are just a measure of who is most trigger-happy and has the least regard for human life.

The thing all those situations have in common is that there was some kind of general situation or altercation before the shooting. If the laws don't make an example of this, fools will decide to blast first and skip every other step.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,368
Reputation
520
Daps
54,272
Reppin
Las Vegas
Bullshyt. Don't pretend to be a legal expert and then just make shyt up.

Can I Shoot a Trespasser in Texas?

"Section 9.41 of the Texas Penal Code clarifies a person is allowed to use force, but not deadly force, to stop a trespass or property interference. Trespassing is defined as knowingly illegally entering a property or remaining on said property after being told to vacate it by someone connected to the property. Theft and “interference with property” is when someone takes another’s property with the goal of denying him or her ownership and without his or her consent. Using these terms and connecting them to the initial scenario above, anyone who fires on a trespasser is likely to face a serious felony charge."



Can I Be Charged for Shooting Someone Who Is On My Property Illegally? | Atascosa County Criminal Defense Attorney

Texas law states that property owners are able to use force to terminate trespassing or theft if they deem it is necessary; however, force and deadly force are two different actions. Shooting the trespasser is considered deadly force since the bullet can easily end the person’s life. If the person is not an immediate threat to you or your family, deadly force is not permissible.



The guy hasn't been charged yet because he's extremely well-connected and because White people shooting in Texas is now basically considered a protected political act. Has nothing to do with the letter of the law.
You seem to be ignoring the threat after he got in the property owners face. It’s beyond trespassing at that point
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,843
Reppin
the ether
The thought of defending your home is disgusting? :heh: sounds like someone who’s from a country that rolls over when invaded

Defend his home? When the fukk was he defending his home? The guy never once was a threat to his home. If you need to lie to defend a murderer, you probably don't have the best case.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,368
Reputation
520
Daps
54,272
Reppin
Las Vegas
Defend his home? When the fukk was he defending his home? The guy never once was a threat to his home. If you need to lie to defend a murderer, you probably don't have the best case.
Again, why are you ignoring the guy getting in his face and threatening to take his gun and use it, then trying to?
 

The God Poster

LWO representa
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
44,176
Reputation
4,731
Daps
134,554
Reppin
NULL
Guy should have left when he saw the other guy had a gun. Bruh was way too confident that nothing was gonna happen and it cost him his life.
shyt I would think someone who allegedly cares about your kids wouldn’t go to the lengths to kil you.

Going to get the gun just further shows short gang really ain’t shyt.
 

Box Factory

hater
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
20,941
Reputation
-424
Daps
53,159
Reppin
#byrdgang
It’s easily defended. It’s his property. That’s all that needs to be said. Get in someone’s face and make threats on their property at your own risk. I enjoy my body parts being intact, so I don’t do that. Others may like to, and you end up a chalk line on someone’s porch
He was there for his son

He mentioned the cops were on their way

He wasn't trying to steal or attack any one

Dude casually walked in and out of his house when getting his gun

He took several steps back and was a fair distance away when he shot him

He wasn't being charged at, or attacked, when he shot

He was in no danger and just being a coward


If murdering someone in this situation is a reasonable response to you, then you're broken mentally

It's not really a discussion :manny:
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
Bullshyt. Don't pretend to be a legal expert and then just make shyt up.

Can I Shoot a Trespasser in Texas?

"Section 9.41 of the Texas Penal Code clarifies a person is allowed to use force, but not deadly force, to stop a trespass or property interference. Trespassing is defined as knowingly illegally entering a property or remaining on said property after being told to vacate it by someone connected to the property. Theft and “interference with property” is when someone takes another’s property with the goal of denying him or her ownership and without his or her consent. Using these terms and connecting them to the initial scenario above, anyone who fires on a trespasser is likely to face a serious felony charge."



Can I Be Charged for Shooting Someone Who Is On My Property Illegally? | Atascosa County Criminal Defense Attorney

Texas law states that property owners are able to use force to terminate trespassing or theft if they deem it is necessary; however, force and deadly force are two different actions. Shooting the trespasser is considered deadly force since the bullet can easily end the person’s life. If the person is not an immediate threat to you or your family, deadly force is not permissible.



The guy hasn't been charged yet because he's extremely well-connected and because White people shooting in Texas is now basically considered a protected political act. Has nothing to do with the letter of the law.
Okay and this lawyer says something different, I bet my lawyer will beat yours in Court, and that's why this guy hasn't been arrested
When Is It Legal to Shoot Someone in Texas? The Castle Doctrine (houston-criminalattorney.com)
ed

The Castle Doctrine gets its name from the philosophy that everyone is the King or Queen in his or her own home. In other words, you shouldn’t have to flee your property because of an intruder. The Texas Penal Code designates certain areas under the protection of the Castle Doctrine: your home, vehicle, and workplace.

In your home, Texas law assumes that you’re justified in using force to defend yourself against intruders. You get immunity under this presumption given a certain set of circumstances

A property and a home are two different things, this was this guy's home

lets see he had a store and refused to leave, he wouldn't be able to shoot him

but at your HOUSE it's different because of Castle Doctrine

and the guy grabbed his gun, and got his face first violating his personal space being hostile
 

Toe Jay Simpson

Searchin’
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
24,312
Reputation
7,856
Daps
131,863
Reppin
Carmel City
This is pretty open and shut if you take emotions out of it. Yes, it’s pretty clear from a moral standpoint that ol boy was itching to murk him with that gun. Legally though dude felt “threatened” and you can argue all day whether or not thats a legit feeling but he’s on his property and does not have to retreat. He is within his rights to brandish the weapon at that point. Other dude got in his face and then tried to take his weapon, he was completely in his legal rights to eliminate him.

The right thing for the dead dude to do would have been to call the cops like he did and then retreat from the property waiting for them to arrive. You cannot be aggressive like that on another person’s property.
 

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,368
Reputation
520
Daps
54,272
Reppin
Las Vegas
He was there for his son

He mentioned the cops were on their way

He wasn't trying to steal or attack any one

Dude casually walked in and out of his house when getting his gun

He took several steps back and was a fair distance away when he shot him

He wasn't being charged at, or attacked, when he shot

He was in no danger and just being a coward


If murdering someone in this situation is a reasonable response to you, then you're broken mentally

It's not really a discussion :manny:
You’re right. It’s not a discussion. It’s self defense
 
Top