Creh smokes another creh on cam

Clayton Endicott

Superstar
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
12,820
Reputation
3,885
Daps
48,515
Reppin
A lodge of the Saints John of Jerusalem
:wtf: wow

f1322683-5760-45fa-8235-1f153f3357a8-Chad_Read_shooting_follow.jpg


Widow releases video of Chad Read's fatal shooting in South Lubbock
Why are you Smooth Criminal leaning into someone when they got the thang out :why:? This pic just reeks of cac privilege :hhh:
 

Clayton Endicott

Superstar
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
12,820
Reputation
3,885
Daps
48,515
Reppin
A lodge of the Saints John of Jerusalem
Shooter wasn't even with his "current wife", apparently he was still married to that judge and having an affair with this woman. She divorced him AFTER the shooting. :mjlol:


Carruth’s now-ex-wife filed a countersuit in her divorce proceedings to exclude her ex-husband from their Lubbock home on 9th Street.

In the affidavit, according to the newspaper, Anne-Marie Carruth wrote she was “notified that my husband, William Kyle Carruth, is under investigation for the shooting and killing of his girlfriend’s children’s father after he attempted to pick up his children late Friday afternoon. My knowledge of the incident is very limited at this time, and it is my understanding that the police are still investigating.”
:dwillhuh:
 

Edub

Veteran
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
32,567
Reputation
2,536
Daps
73,275
Kyle kept talking like he didn’t just kill that man …. :gucci:…… and why can’t people shoot to injure…. Fukk wrong wit people






(Only thing that will save Kyle is the fact that the baby daddy said he’d take the gun away from him and tried…. What stops him from tryin again…. unfortunately it will be seen as self defense)
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,843
Reppin
the ether
He did threaten the guy with violence though

Where did he threaten the guy with violence before the guy pulled a gun on him?




This was murder and wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't premeditated. People who think this was justified are psychopath.

I don't think they're thinking through the least what kind of world they'd create where someone would be allowed to escalate a situation that they created themselves and then kill the other guy for simply responding.

* Shooter and his girlfriend created the situation by not giving up the kids at the court appointed time.

* Shooter escalated that shyt by pulling out a gun when there was no violent threat

* Shooter fired a shot in the direction of the other guy when he was still in zero danger whatsoever. Taller breh has the right to defend himself from a psycho with a gun who has fired a shot, all he was trying to do was get the gun away.

* Shooter fired lethal shots at an unarmed man 10 feet away from him who was just standing there with his hands at his side. Yet again no immediate threat.



I wonder if the same people justifying this guy thought that Arbury was in the wrong for trying to get the gun away from the guys trying to hold him up, or thought that Rittenhouse was in the right to shoot at 4 different people.
 

ImLionyall

Workin on dat Roar
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
937
Reputation
170
Daps
4,815
Reppin
Serengeti
Shooter wasn't even with his "current wife", apparently he was still married to that judge and having an affair with this woman. She divorced him AFTER the shooting. :mjlol:


Carruth’s now-ex-wife filed a countersuit in her divorce proceedings to exclude her ex-husband from their Lubbock home on 9th Street.

In the affidavit, according to the newspaper, Anne-Marie Carruth wrote she was “notified that my husband, William Kyle Carruth, is under investigation for the shooting and killing of his girlfriend’s children’s father after he attempted to pick up his children late Friday afternoon. My knowledge of the incident is very limited at this time, and it is my understanding that the police are still investigating.”
Gotdamn this is so fukking messy.:hhh:

These kids gonna be fukked up.
 

King

The black man is always targeted.
Joined
Apr 8, 2017
Messages
18,681
Reputation
4,029
Daps
79,657
Idk how dumb you’d have to be to fight a man with a gun :stopitslime:

But I’m not against CACS killing each other :yeshrug:
 

Red11

Pro
Supporter
Joined
Nov 9, 2015
Messages
1,051
Reputation
90
Daps
2,328
Where did he threaten the guy with violence before the guy pulled a gun on him?






I don't think they're thinking through the least what kind of world they'd create where someone would be allowed to escalate a situation that they created themselves and then kill the other guy for simply responding.

* Shooter and his girlfriend created the situation by not giving up the kids at the court appointed time.

* Shooter escalated that shyt by pulling out a gun when there was no violent threat

* Shooter fired a shot in the direction of the other guy when he was still in zero danger whatsoever. Taller breh has the right to defend himself from a psycho with a gun who has fired a shot, all he was trying to do was get the gun away.

* Shooter fired lethal shots at an unarmed man 10 feet away from him who was just standing there with his hands at his side. Yet again no immediate threat.



I wonder if the same people justifying this guy thought that Arbury was in the wrong for trying to get the gun away from the guys trying to hold him up, or thought that Rittenhouse was in the right to shoot at 4 different people.
Kid wasn't there.
I'll agree on one point. Go inside the house or to your car and leave. If dude breaks in THEN smoke him.
 
Top