COZY: BLM leader (Deray) lives in home owned by Soros’ Open Society board member

[Isaiah Bradley]

this is exactly the problem with blm movement its lack of focus on economics

economics should be the measuring sticks of accomplishments, not attention and not networking

blm is making the same mistake that booker t, dubois, naacp made, they were bamboozled because they thought attention and networking were accomplishments

killer mike has done way more than blm has ever done simply by focusing on economics, he was wasting his time trying to network and bring attention to bernie sanders, but the #bankblack movement is one of the most significant things black people have done in decades, blm and deray on the other hand is a joke and always will be as long as their main goal is attention and networking and other gibberish

this is so repetitive...

Riiiigggghhhhhtttt because BLM's goal should encompass efforts to address economics and not "focus the nation's attention on the plight of the black community"

This is the type of weak rhetoric that the koon Tara Setmayer was trying to use against and got destroyed by Dr. Dyson when he said

You're mad at the NAACP is not the urban league. They all have different reasons and raison d'etre for their existence.

Let us be adults and recognize that goals could be strived for/achieved simultaneously without undermining each other

lol. you just ether yourself
In a seperate discussion, a rich black person will be considered a target too under white supremacy

Deray admitted the importance of wealth building and specified the lack of an economic component within BLM
So again, why are you trying to add on to their agenda instead of doing your own thang, everyone has their own lane

Why is that so difficult for you to understand


Nikkas are fed up of hearing from your kind about the "whiteman" and speeches about "the dangers of white liberals" that's not complimented by actions, achievements, and practical short/long term goals
Telling a nikka to go make a billionare to combat police brutality, you just permanently lost soldier



And your need to change the agenda of an organization is unnecesaary
And getting your economics right, regardless of protesting or not, is what responsible citizens do, regardless of color
And don't get it twisted, Marcus Garvey was a great man, leader and I'm a strong believer in his efforts and philosophies towards uprooting white supremacy. But knowing his history doesn't spark motivation and commitment because of the realities of folks' lives now

 

[Meta Reign]

Gotta say I'm glad twism13 is in this thread. Saves me a lot if typing.

 

[theworldismine13]

Using "reasonably described" to something that has a state of either being or not being, is further indication of ego tripping and talking shyt

You're making claims, with no evidence, so I'm checking you on your sloppiness and selfserving efforts

lmao. There's nothing semantics about knowing how to use words properly

"reasonably described" is just a passive aggressive way of saying you're an idiot

What a fail attempt at trying to distort the point that your careless use of words and meanings negate any credibility to be seen as a thoughtful, detail oriented, and pragmatic individual

Again. Switching between the word "equality" and "civic rights," further shows your lack of respect and understanding for "words"
There's nothing interchangeable between these words because they have different meanings

Respect authorship

in this discussion equality and civic rights is the same thing

"Mistake," suggest a penalty and consequence. There's no penalty or consequence to achieving goals simultaneously that doesn't undermine each other

mistake suggests a mistake

You being a stickler for a narrative. is grandstanding for your own ego. There's no reason for the should/could argument because either options will not undermine whether any goal could be achieved. Again, who are you trying to impress?

there is no ego involved, this ego tripping argument comes everytime you get backed in a corner and have nothing to say

my argument from the beginning of this thread has been the same economics comes first, there has never been any contradiction in that

and this is where the jealous smart dumb nikka rhetoric starts folk, to downplay the fact that you created a thread about a man, you don't know, living conditions. His social and/or professional network was able to spark action, while you are on the sideline forcing an unnecessary should/could discussion

name me one accomplishment of deray aside from getting attention and "networking", he has none

You're so quick to click the reply button, how about just reading for comprehension

It has nothing to do with a black man or blackmen investing

Just like you don't care that you cannot use two different meaning words interchangeably, why would you care about the actions and motivations of black folks who are able to network within various social/political/professional circles to attain money for their personal interest

you asked for evidence that garvey raised millions of dollars and i posted it, its that simple

You don't understand, so instead you rather write stereotyping nonsense
Show me where I said black people cannot raise money?
evidence or STFU

i said that dubois and washington should have raised money from black people this was your response

black people during the mid 19th century to 20th century, had money to fund these efforts?
So black folks' wealth became poorer as the years went by?

i said garvey raised millions from black people and you demanded proof, i gave you the proof

so going back to my statement, booker t and dubois made the mistake of depending on white liberals for their funding, they should have raised money for their endeavors like garvey did, by establishing corporations and by small donations from regular black people

and going back to the subject at hand, blm should not take money from white liberals if they do they will fall in the same trap dubois and booker t did

this is so repetitive

I'm pro-black,
not
pro-rhetoric,
pro-emotion,
pro-jealousy,
pro-manworhsip
pro-narrative

it is, im not even sure what all this gibberish you wrote is about, but to repeat this whole multi page page argument is just getting your panties in a bunch for me saying that blm should not take money from white liberals

we need to continue to marinate on why you insist that blm take white money

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

"reasonably described" is just a passive aggressive way of saying you're an idiot
in this discussion equality and civic rights is the same thing
mistake suggests a mistake
there is no ego involved, this ego tripping argument comes everytime you get backed in a corner and have nothing to say
my argument from the beginning of this thread has been the same economics comes first, there has never been any contradiction in that
name me one accomplishment of deray aside from getting attention and "networking", he has none

there's no ego, but you using a term "reasonably described" to a yes or no statement
and
there's no ego, but arguing that "equality" and "civic rights" are the same thing "in this discussion," yet both words are not interchangeable in any discussion

you asked for evidence that garvey raised millions of dollars and i posted it, its that simple
i said that dubois and washington should have raised money from black people this was your response
i said garvey raised millions from black people and you demanded proof, i gave you the proof
so going back to my statement, booker t and dubois made the mistake of depending on white liberals for their funding, they should have raised money for their endeavors like garvey did, by establishing corporations and by small donations from regular black people
and going back to the subject at hand, blm should not take money from white liberals if they do they will fall in the same trap dubois and booker t did

very silly

Just admit you don't understand the point I was making prior, during, and after the request for evidence

The exact figure don't matter, that wasn't my point. It has nothing to do with whether blackfolks could build something, it has to do with what you could present as facts

Like I said, without knowing the history of Washington, it would be misleading to simply say a blackman invested in Garvey. Washington networked among various racial groups to get things accomplished

How many Washington-isc folks existed back then that chose to support or not to support Garvey? There's no record to show the educated, financial, social breakdown of the type of Black folks that supported Garvey efforts. Was it the rich, poor, educated etc

Knowing that Garvey don't fawk with whitefolks, FBI sent black faces to infiltrate. How many black faces did white entrepreneurs send inorder to get returns from a successful company or to also sabotage? 0,1 or 15

So like Washington, the act of securing money doesn't make a person a koon/puppet/agent. His actions and intentions determines that

it is, im not even sure what all this gibberish you wrote is about, but to repeat this whole multi page page argument is just getting your panties in a bunch for me saying that blm should not take money from white liberals

we need to continue to marinate on why you insist that blm take white money

Please note. Repeating the same false narrative doesn't make it any truer

But this multipage discussion has drawn us closer...put your palms on the computer screen or phone screen, like me

Spoiler

you dumb azz, respect authorship and provide evidence, instead of racial buzzwords

 

[theworldismine13]

there's no ego, but you using a term "reasonably described" to a yes or no statement

like i said i was just passively aggresively calling you an idiot

and
there's no ego, but arguing that "equality" and "civic rights" are the same thing "in this discussion," yet both words are not interchangeable in any discussion

as far as im concerened they are

very silly

Just admit you don't understand the point I was making prior, during, and after the request for evidence

im quoting your own post were you asked me to prove that garvey raised millions, i proved it so STFU

Please note. Repeating the same false narrative doesn't make it any truer

But this multipage discussion has drawn us closer...put your palms on the computer screen or phone screen, like me

Spoiler

you dumb azz, respect authorship and provide evidence, instead of racial buzzwords

how is it not true, your whole stance in this thread is that there is nothing wrong with blm taking money from rich white liberals, i said nah there is something wrong and you got mad and started writing essays, that is all that happened in this thread

so lets marinate in this deep rage and turmoil inside you due to anybody saying anything about kind massa

you on some, "how dare you talk about them good white folk like that, dont you know we need them for attention and networking and places to live"

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

like i said i was just passively aggresively calling you an idiot




as far as im concerened they are


im quoting yor own post were you asked me to prove that garvey raised millions, i proved it so STFU





how is it not true, your whole stance in this thread is that there is nothing wrong with blm taking money from rich white liberals, i said nah there is something wrong and you got mad and started writing essays, that is all that happened in this thread

so lets marinate in this deep rage and turmoil inside you due to anybody saying anything about kind massa

you on some, how dare you talk about them good white folk like that

oh new reply...is there finally some evidence...

Spoiler

no

 

[theworldismine13]

oh new reply...is there finally some evidence...

Spoiler

no

i dont even know what evidence it is you are asking for, i provided the proof that garvey raised millions

and you have yet to say what exactly deray has accomplished besides getting attention and networking

you have spent all this time writing essays defending a nazi supporting white liberal and a homeless twitter fiend

 

[Meta Reign]

i dont even know what evidence it is you are asking for, i provided the proof that garvey raised millions

and you have yet to say what exactly deray has accomplished besides getting attention and networking

you have spent all this time writng essays defending a nazi supporting white liberal and a homeless twitter fiend

A wealthy Jew Nazi gives shelter to a homeless faq negro. Shyt sounds like a gay romantic comedy.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

i dont even know what evidence it is you are asking for, i provided the proof that garvey raised millions
and you have yet to say what exactly deray has accomplished besides getting attention and networking
you have spent all this time writing essays defending a nazi supporting white liberal and a homeless twitter fiend

oh a new reply....evidence or anything new...hmmm

Spoiler

no

 

[theworldismine13]

oh a new reply....evidence or anything new...hmmm

Spoiler

no

Black Business Network | Marcus Garvey

His most famous business venture was a shipping company known as the Black Star Line. Garvey started the shipping company in 1919 as a way to promote trade but also to transport passengers to Africa. He believed it could also serve as an important and tangible sign of Black success. The Black Star Line, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware as a U.S. domestic corporation on June 27, 1919. It began with ten million dollars in investment capital. It sold shares individually valued at five dollars to both U.N.I.A. members and non-members alike. Proceeds from stock sales were used to purchase first the S.S. Yarmouth and then the S.S. Shadyside. The Shadyside was used by the Association for summer outings and excursions, as well as rented out on charter to other organizations. The Black Star Line later purchased the Kanawha as its third vessel. This small yacht was intended for inter-island transportation in the West Indies and was rechristened the S.S. Antonio Maceo.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

Black Business Network | Marcus Garvey

oh a new reply...evidence or atleast something interesting...

Spoiler

no...cot damn it

 

[theworldismine13]

oh a new reply...evidence or atleast something interesting...

Spoiler

no...cot damn it

how come you never shared what deray has accomplished aside from getting attention and networking?

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

how come you never shared what deray has accomplished aside from getting attention and networking?

oh I got an alert...please let it be a reply from all those PMs I sent to coli females...

Spoiler

fawk

 

[theworldismine13]

oh I got an alert...please let it be a reply from all those PMs I sent to coli females...

Spoiler

fawk

so i guess the is answer is deray has done nothing except bring attention to himself and network with white people

 

[Sean312]

Tariq been said this a minute ago. And I knew something was fishy with it when I saw people starting marches and protesting all in the hoods of Chicago, but it was mostly WHITE people, and them running it.