KravenMorehead™
Barrel Brothers.®
Old convo saved from the internet Cont'd:
Poster A said:This is pretty short-sighted.Poster C said:Okay, I read it. It's bullshyt. The person seems to think the reason black youth act the way they do, ending up in prisons, is because of the music they listen to?! Okay, so personal accountability just doesn't exist with black folk, huh? We hear some gangsta shyt and just HAVE to act gangsta and rob liquor stores and smoke weed and shyt. fukk outta heah.
This argument was made about rock and roll back when Elvis was making it popular. Yes, Chuck Berry besides. Years later, the same concern was raised over hard rock and its influence over the youth. Of course, in both cases, we're talking about white youth. Nothing ever came of it because in the end it was realized that those young people who chose to do crazy shyt had little or nothing to do with the music out at the time. The music was just a reflection of things like that, not the other way around. It is no different for gangsta rap or whatever the pop-injected stuff is that the kids of today listen to a lot now.
In my summation, you don't need some Illumanati-ish secret meeting with people with guns to get any group of people to listen to a type of music or to commit crimes. I was still a kid when NWA hit the scene. I thought they were entertaining, but I never for a second thought of shooting someone. Are you kidding me? End of rant.
African people have been subjected to negative portrayals and messages from ALL FACETS OF MEDIA. I have another thread right now(400 yrs without a comb) that talks about the impact of the media that, for years before we were even born, showed Black people in every negative light imaginable and what effects said media has had on how/ what we think of our natural appearance, especially our hair.
We have a serious problem with acknowledging a simple truth in converse to the same truth that we have no problem admitting the other way around. We talk all the time about the transformative power of education(books i.e. MEDIA) because it's positive. But then we turn around and say that negative messages and images in media CAN'T affect us negatively?
Moreover you can't compare how we're responding to media to how white people respond to it. White people largely get FANTASTIC portrayals of themselves in the media. Moreover, this is THEIR CULTURE and culture is a people's social immune system. OUR CULTURE has largely been broken down and destroyed. And just as when you have a weak internal immune system, even common illnesses that are easily treatable may become life-threatening.
And it doesn't matter if it didn't affect YOU per se. This isn't about absolutes or incidences. It's about patterns.
Media/ propaganda does, in fact, change/ shape cultures of people. This is one of the oldest facts in this world. And it should be examined within its proper context which is much larger than merely hip hop music alone.
Moreover, I've already spoken on the issue of personal accountability. The issue is how does one reconcile personal accountability with the fact of social engineering being conducted by the administers of the society through their primary means of systematically relating to us i.e. their institutions e.g. economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, war etc.
Can't have it just one way. Media is a neutral tool, but a tool none the less. It has a purpose and it has always been to spread ideas to people, whether those are negative or positive ideas.
Poster A said:This is the final post on page 2 of this thread:Poster C said:I can see your point of view, but true knowledge and teaching starts in the home. Granted, young people from broken homes (I wasn't such a kid) are at a disadvantage from Jump Street. However, I still contend that people have the ability to think for themselves and would not necessarily be drawn into a life of crime based on what they hear over the radio. If you are saying this may be true of SOME people, fine, because we all know not even half of all "black" people in this country are necessarily in jail or about to be there. So to that point, I give you that.
For the most part, media is entertainment. Only the truly weak-minded take it seriously. As long as people have the capacity for self-awareness and deep thought, to place blame on the media is just too easy a scapegoat. Again, I emphasize this may be more difficult for children from broken homes who may not genuinely know any damn better. Of course, you would also have to take into account that even in poor circumstances, the African-American populace isn't necessarily overrun with thugs and fools in every single corner.
Poster D said:Whether or not this is true, someone needs to write about the private meeting to OVERSEXUALIZE the black community. With sex, killing a nikka and balling on people's minds all day, who have time to pick up a biology book?
Why is this poster mentioning picking up biology books?
Most likely because he's aware that media affects how people think and behave.
And again, we're not living in a bubble where music is the only form of media. The fact that what we're discussing in this thread is media that is of the entertainment variety actually STRENGTHENS the idea if one really thinks about it. When education is made to be entertaining, it is absorbed much more easily.
Let's be clear here. Media is communication and what all comprises of our surroundings.
Definition of Media:
1. a plural of medium.
2. ( usually used with a plural verb ) the means of communication, as radio and television, newspapers, and magazines, that reach or influence people widely: The media are covering the speech tonight.
Definition of Medium:
1. a middle state or condition; mean.
2. something intermediate in nature or degree.
3. an intervening substance, as air, through which a force acts or an effect is produced.
4. the element that is the natural habitat of an organism.
5. surrounding objects, conditions, or influences; environment.
It is in the very definition of the word media that it influences people. In media, we're talking about everything from books, magazines, billboard ads, symbols all around us in murals, statues, on money, on road signs, television, radio, internet as well as person to person communication in its various forms. Media matters in shaping the thinking and behavior patterns of individuals and whole groups of people for the entirety of their lives. The issue is HOW MUCH it matters as we attempt to reconcile it with issues such as free will, personal accountability and the like. And for me personally, the degree to which it matters is a question of the development of the involved parties in relation to each other.
Even on a person to person basis, this is what we consider the most. It's why we have not only laws but just basic morality and sensibility that tells us that human beings who are at a certain level of development are more or less capable of affecting one another at varying levels i.e. it's more so the more developed party that has more of an affect on the lesser developed than the other way around.
What do we see when we examine Black People's development as a group as it concerns media as well as any other institution in relation to other groups of people, most notably white people? Are we on the same level? Are we superior to them in development in ANY institution at all? Is our economic development more advanced than whites? Do we control THEIR economics or is it the other way around? Do we mostly employ them or do they mostly employ us? Do we control mass media and its means of dissemination in this society or do they? Is it more so OUR IDEAS/ PERSPECTIVES/ POINT OF VIEWS that are equally communicated via mass media in this country or is it white people systematically picking what they want people to see and excluding what they don't want people to see?
Look at what you said about the reality of our social landscape as it concerns thugs and fools in every single corner. Is rap music as a whole an accurate portrayal of all that encompasses African people here in America?
In a society where we stress how important it is to learn or even master the institutions that are critical to advancement, such as the ability to read for instance, we cannot overemphasize that there are positives AND negatives. If someone is positively affected by that biology book that Inclined mentioned, that doesn't mean that they are weak-minded. We would never say that of results that we felt were positive. But we readily acknowledge the EFFECT of media when we approve of the results. Then we turn right around and DENY its effect if the results are undesired.
Like I said, we can't have it both ways. It's not a matter of being weak-minded. We're affected by media, in positive and negative ways, because we're human. The degree to which we're affected by it, whether negatively or positively, has to do with any number of factors including our rate/ level of development as individuals and as a collective.