Corporate Dems giving Jeff Bezos $10B and more handouts ( America COMPETES Act of 2022)

OfTheCross

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,350
Reputation
4,874
Daps
98,671
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
:pacspit:

These people are trash.





Sanders announced in his Senate speech that he will not back any unanimous consent request to speed up the passage of the America COMPETES Act—which the House approved in February—unless there is a roll call vote on two “extremely important” amendments he has introduced.

Taking aim at microchip firms, the senator said that “providing $53 billion in corporate welfare to an industry that has outsourced tens of thousands of jobs to low-wage countries and spent hundreds of billions on stock buybacks with no strings attached may make sense to some people, but it does not make sense to me, nor do I think it makes sense to the American people.”

Sanders’ first amendment “would prevent microchip companies from receiving taxpayer assistance unless they agree to issue warrants or equity stakes to the federal government,” he explained. “If private companies are going to benefit from over $53 billion in corporate welfare, the financial gains made by these companies must be shared with the American people, not just wealthy shareholders.”

“In other words, all this amendment says is that if these companies want taxpayer assistance, we are not going to socialize all of the risks and privatize all of the profits,” he added. “If these investments turn out to be profitable as a direct result of these federal grants, the taxpayers of this country have a right to get a return on that investment.”

The second amendment “would simply eliminate the $10 billion bailout for Jeff Bezos to fly to the moon,” Sanders said, acknowledging the billionaire’s personal wealth. “If Mr. Bezos wants to go to the moon, let him use his own money, not the taxpayers’.”

While Sanders criticized those two particular elements of the America COMPETES Act, progressives and foreign policy experts have also raised other concerns. As Common Dreams reported last month, an analysis by Ashik Siddique of the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies called the bill “part of a dangerous trend of feeding tensions between the U.S. and China.”

America COMPETES Act Ignores Social Needs, Feeds Tensions With China: Analysis
 

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,399
Reputation
685
Daps
17,058
Whether people like it or not Amazon is one of the biggest employers right now, the feds going make sure Jeff bezos is straight
People like Amazon, and Walmart always going to be here unless there is a direct American competitor that makes more money
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,156
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,845
Reppin
CookoutGang
:russ:

The money to launch rockets was going to be spent either way. Whether it's a via nasa or a public private partnership is inconsequential.:pachaha:

I see Bernie is still quoting the false narrative that these issues are either or.

Money isn't directly going to Americans because the majority of his colleagues doesn't support it. As the head of the budget committee he's been woefully unsuccessful and I could do without him yelling at the wind like he has no power.

:russell:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,156
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,845
Reppin
CookoutGang
Taking aim at microchip firms, the senator said that “providing $53 billion in corporate welfare to an industry that has outsourced tens of thousands of jobs to low-wage countries and spent hundreds of billions on stock buybacks with no strings attached may make sense to some people, but it does not make sense to me, nor do I think it makes sense to the American people.”
I think folks agree with the sentiment, but if this leads to jobs for poor Americans especially those in the hard hit manufacturing industry I doubt they care because they are very much aware of how capitalism works. :francis:

“In other words, all this amendment says is that if these companies want taxpayer assistance, we are not going to socialize all of the risks and privatize all of the profits,” he added. “If these investments turn out to be profitable as a direct result of these federal grants, the taxpayers of this country have a right to get a return on that investment.”
The pragmatic solution here would be to require companies to provide workers with bonuses and stock (no matter their employment status) for companies receiving these grants.

What's the realistic goal here?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,692
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
Sanders’ first amendment “would prevent microchip companies from receiving taxpayer assistance unless they agree to issue warrants or equity stakes to the federal government,” he explained. “If private companies are going to benefit from over $53 billion in corporate welfare, the financial gains made by these companies must be shared with the American people, not just wealthy shareholders.”

“In other words, all this amendment says is that if these companies want taxpayer assistance, we are not going to socialize all of the risks and privatize all of the profits,” he added. “If these investments turn out to be profitable as a direct result of these federal grants, the taxpayers of this country have a right to get a return on that investment.”


This is brilliant. From the responses I feel a lot of people didn't even read the entire post. What about this proposal do you disagree with?
 
  • Dap
Reactions: No1

ORDER_66

Rebirth is upon Us 2025
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
146,845
Reputation
15,849
Daps
585,826
Reppin
Queens,NY
fukk he should have been president :salute:

tumblr_p4umq4YBSA1uezmbko2_540.gifv


Nah :camby:
 
Top