First you or your sister can catch it more than once. Two there's no guarantee the second time you catch it the symptoms won't be severe or kill you. So with that information why wouldn't you want 70% of the population to get the vaccine? If that many people had the vaccine right now none of our hospitals would be overranSo from what I've read/understand about the vaccines in circulation (and please correct me if I'm wrong), the vaccine doesn't actually prevent you from getting Covid or transmitting Covid to someone else. It just reduces your risk of getting severe illness e.g. if you would have died from Covid induced issues, now you might just get a slight fever.
So with that information, what's the justification for someone who even without the vaccine wouldn't contract severe illness from Covid and the vaccine wouldn't offer anymore protection than their body's natural immune system does.
My younger sister got Covid earlier this year and she had a fever for 1 day and after that she was fine. What's the onus for someone like her to get vaccinated. Just legit curious because if this is the case, then is there a need to vaccinate 70-75% of the population? Should resources be allocated to those with highest risk and then those who would like to get the vaccine?
First you or your sister can catch it more than once. Two there's no guarantee the second time you catch it the symptoms won't be severe or kill you. So with that information why wouldn't you want 70% 9f the population to get the vaccine? If that many people had the vaccine right now none of our hospitals would be overran
another one whose budget just came in
Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot says restaurants and bars need to be allowed to reopen 'as quickly as possible'
No, you should go do more research. Meanwhile wear a mask and social distanceI guess what I'm getting at is this. There's a certain profile of people that if they were to get Covid, would likely require hospitalization. I think those are the people we should prioritize. I don't think that population of people is anywhere close to 70-75% of the population. Yes, my sister can catch Covid again and it could be more severe but wouldn't the severity of the 2nd case be dependent on any negative changes in my sister's health profile?
So from what I've read/understand about the vaccines in circulation (and please correct me if I'm wrong), the vaccine doesn't actually prevent you from getting Covid or transmitting Covid to someone else. It just reduces your risk of getting severe illness e.g. if you would have died from Covid induced issues, now you might just get a slight fever.
So with that information, what's the justification for someone who even without the vaccine wouldn't contract severe illness from Covid and the vaccine wouldn't offer anymore protection than their body's natural immune system does.
My younger sister got Covid earlier this year and she had a fever for 1 day and after that she was fine. What's the onus for someone like her to get vaccinated. Just legit curious because if this is the case, then is there a need to vaccinate 70-75% of the population? Should resources be allocated to those with highest risk and then those who would like to get the vaccine?
Thought yhe vaccine was a cure for cancer in the movie.
A vaccine is a vaccine