Coronavirus Thread: Worldwide Pandemic

phcitywarrior

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
13,509
Reputation
4,690
Daps
32,704
Reppin
Naija / DMV
So from what I've read/understand about the vaccines in circulation (and please correct me if I'm wrong), the vaccine doesn't actually prevent you from getting Covid or transmitting Covid to someone else. It just reduces your risk of getting severe illness e.g. if you would have died from Covid induced issues, now you might just get a slight fever.

So with that information, what's the justification for someone who even without the vaccine wouldn't contract severe illness from Covid and the vaccine wouldn't offer anymore protection than their body's natural immune system does.

My younger sister got Covid earlier this year and she had a fever for 1 day and after that she was fine. What's the onus for someone like her to get vaccinated. Just legit curious because if this is the case, then is there a need to vaccinate 70-75% of the population for herd immunity if the vaccine doesnt offer immunity?Should resources be allocated to those with highest risk and then those who would like to get the vaccine?
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
8,089
Reputation
981
Daps
25,146
Reppin
Philadelphia
So from what I've read/understand about the vaccines in circulation (and please correct me if I'm wrong), the vaccine doesn't actually prevent you from getting Covid or transmitting Covid to someone else. It just reduces your risk of getting severe illness e.g. if you would have died from Covid induced issues, now you might just get a slight fever.

So with that information, what's the justification for someone who even without the vaccine wouldn't contract severe illness from Covid and the vaccine wouldn't offer anymore protection than their body's natural immune system does.

My younger sister got Covid earlier this year and she had a fever for 1 day and after that she was fine. What's the onus for someone like her to get vaccinated. Just legit curious because if this is the case, then is there a need to vaccinate 70-75% of the population? Should resources be allocated to those with highest risk and then those who would like to get the vaccine?
First you or your sister can catch it more than once. Two there's no guarantee the second time you catch it the symptoms won't be severe or kill you. So with that information why wouldn't you want 70% of the population to get the vaccine? If that many people had the vaccine right now none of our hospitals would be overran
 
Last edited:

phcitywarrior

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
13,509
Reputation
4,690
Daps
32,704
Reppin
Naija / DMV
First you or your sister can catch it more than once. Two there's no guarantee the second time you catch it the symptoms won't be severe or kill you. So with that information why wouldn't you want 70% 9f the population to get the vaccine? If that many people had the vaccine right now none of our hospitals would be overran

I guess what I'm getting at is this. There's a certain profile of people that if they were to get Covid, would likely require hospitalization. I think those are the people we should prioritize. I don't think that population of people is anywhere close to 70-75% of the population. Yes, my sister can catch Covid again and it could be more severe but wouldn't the severity of the 2nd case be dependent on any negative changes in my sister's health profile?
 

King Theo

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,892
Reputation
360
Daps
7,524
Reppin
NULL
:russ:

listen i forsaw this. but for them to switch their tone so abruptly is laughable. go out there and explain to the people why you are making this decision and do it thoroughly. dont play no games in teh middle of the pandemic. mf still not gonna feel safe to go but i feel the need for them to be open. i dont think consumer confidence is gonna be high unless they can tell the people how and why.
 
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
8,089
Reputation
981
Daps
25,146
Reppin
Philadelphia
I guess what I'm getting at is this. There's a certain profile of people that if they were to get Covid, would likely require hospitalization. I think those are the people we should prioritize. I don't think that population of people is anywhere close to 70-75% of the population. Yes, my sister can catch Covid again and it could be more severe but wouldn't the severity of the 2nd case be dependent on any negative changes in my sister's health profile?
No, you should go do more research. Meanwhile wear a mask and social distance
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,876
Reputation
5,169
Daps
47,241
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
So from what I've read/understand about the vaccines in circulation (and please correct me if I'm wrong), the vaccine doesn't actually prevent you from getting Covid or transmitting Covid to someone else. It just reduces your risk of getting severe illness e.g. if you would have died from Covid induced issues, now you might just get a slight fever.

I think that is still an open question. Plus it is a sliding scale not on/off.

So with that information, what's the justification for someone who even without the vaccine wouldn't contract severe illness from Covid and the vaccine wouldn't offer anymore protection than their body's natural immune system does.

It's a greater-good argument, a reduction and/or eradication argument, a sliding scale reduction argument and a lowering of broader mutation risk argument.

My younger sister got Covid earlier this year and she had a fever for 1 day and after that she was fine. What's the onus for someone like her to get vaccinated. Just legit curious because if this is the case, then is there a need to vaccinate 70-75% of the population? Should resources be allocated to those with highest risk and then those who would like to get the vaccine?

Need to vaccinate 70-75% to reach what target? Herd Immunity? Then it might be more than that. Also "asymptomatic damage".

-

From a personal selfish point-of-view if you are in a very low risk group the best argument is eradicating covid eventually before you get older. Reducing prevalence. Or doing both before it mutates to something more dangerous and to reduce the chances of mutations happening.

in the worst case scenario vaccines might have ~marginal benefits. I think TPTB know that but what else are they supposed to do?
 

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
22,602
Reputation
5,032
Daps
63,206
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
Dude at one of the facilities from my job called me today at my office and was like, we need to get you squared away for the covid vaccine. I planned on getting it anyways but it wasn't really like I had a choice it appears. Given that I work in healthcare, we will need to get it fast, even though I'm a controller (accounting) at the corporate office. I'm going to guess that this vaccine will become mandatory at some point in the near future.
 
Top