@Thabo
Stop trolling and making crat up. Either post cite some sources that support your claims or bounce out of this thread.
I can tell that that you're trolling because funny enough you're trying to base people in this thread who have an interest for Ancient Egypt. You tell them to focus on West African history like you are the ambassador of what African-Americans can study. When members on this thread say they have an interest in Mali and Timbuktu you not only further base them for their interest and but try to claim Mali and Timbuktu was some black hating states that mostly enslaved black people. Also ignoring the fact that AA's have a good amount of Mandinka ancestry, the same Mandinkas who founded the Mali Empire.
But that's not the point. The point is your lying. Yes, Timbuktu was founded by Tuareg Berbers, by then it was just a small trading post in the desert. It was later conquered and mostly controlled by Mandinka people. The Timbuktu that we know today was created by Mandinka people. The rich libraries, universities and architecture.
But you trying to say that Timbuktu is not apart of "black Mali", but Azawad is even more idiotic and hilarious. What the hell is a "black Mali." How can anyone take you serious after that?
Azawad was a SHORT-LIVED rebel state in Northern Mali by Tuaregs. Back then there was never an Azawad. During both Mali and Songhai Timbuktu was always controlled by "black Malis" lol, since they had a foot in the government, education, politics and trade. Tuaregs barely had any influence beyond nomadic traders and personal armies for the Western Sudanic kings. The people of Timbuktu was described mostly as BLACK by scholars and travelers like Ibn Battuta.
So what the hell are you getting at?
And the Mali Empire was not "Arab based." Are you silly? The only thing they adopted by Arabs were the religion and writing system. Popular to common belief, The Mali empire was majority indigenous beliefs if I remember correctly. It was mainly the elites who were Muslim, even still Islamic beliefs in Mali were mixed with traditional African beliefs and the King did not force people to convert to Islam.
Read more at:
Ancient Africa for Kids: Empire of Ancient Mali
Hell heres Ibn Battuta explaining how liberal Mali's Islam was compared to Islam of Arabs and other Muslims. For example women did NOT have to wear veils and had a lot of say.
Ibn Battuta in West Africa
But it gets worse with you... You're claim that Mansa Musa was an Arabized black man who enslaved his people is your biggest lie yet. Yes, Mansa Musa was a devout Muslim, but he cared for his people and invested A LOT into his empire, but I'll get to that later.
First off, most of the slaves in the Mali Empire and in Timbuktu were prisoners of war or slaves that were imported like some Turkish slaves.
"Ibn Bhutta, who lived in West Africa for some years during the Mid-14th century, reported that the Mansa of Mali had an elite bodyguard of 300 slave recruited soldiers. These Mamluks are believed to have included Turks and other Northerners, perhaps even some Europeans"....
From Historical Atlas of the Islamic World, by David Nicolle
"It is interesting to note the great demand of the Mali people for Turkish, Ethiopian, and other slave-girls, and also for eunuchs and Turkish boys. The slave trade thus went in both directions."
-
The Cambridge history of Africa: From c. 1600 to c. 1790, pp 90
In the 1300's al~Umari wrote that behind the mansa of Mali's throne
"stand some thirty Turkish [Mamluk] or other mercenaries, purchased for him in Cairo. One of them holds a silk parasol in his hand, surmounted by a cupola and a gold bird representing a sparrow hawk." Translation by D.T. Niane.
Yeah these people all the way from Cairo, Europe, Ethiopia and Turkey are SOOOOOOO Mansa Musa's people.
Lets not even get into the fact that Mali's economy wasn't even based on slavery like say Kanem, but gold and salt, since around that time Mali controlled 2/3 of the worlds gold supply. But getting to more important facts. During Mansa Musa's dsays no black slaves were even linked to the Trans Sahara Slave trade.
"
Except for the Zandj (black slaves) from lower Iraq, no large body of blacks historically linked to the trans-Saharan slave trade existed anywhere in the Arab world ... The high costs of slaves, because of the risks inherent in the desert crossing, which would have not permitted such a massive exodus ... In this connection, it is significant that in the Arabic iconography of the period, the slave merchant was often depicted as a man with a hole in his purse. Until the Crusades the Muslim world drew its slaves from two main sources: Eastern and Central Europe (Slavs) and Turkestan. The Sudan only came third. " -
Africa from the Seventh to Eleventh Century, UNESCO, 1988
So lose us with the lying BS. Mansa Musa was a king that was noted for caring for his people and kingdom. And the people actually saw themselves as superior to non-Sudanese(black people), but thats not an important part. The important thing was that Mansa Musa not only cared for his people, but invested in his people and his kingdom.
Website Disabled
West Africa Before the Colonial Era: A History to 1850
WOW...What a self-hating Arabized c00n allowing indigenous
black religions in his court.
But its cute how Islamic African kingdoms/states automatically get assumed with enslaving their own people and being solely based on slavery, yet coastal non-Islamic West African states who's economies were solely based on slavery never does.
Slavery and the Kingdoms of Oyo, Dahomey and Asante
Should AAs too ignore these West African states? Funny you didn't mention them on your little troll jihad on Islamic West African states.
Why the heck should AAs or ANYONE for that matter listen to you on African history when you yourself don't have a clue on African history...