Essential Conspiracy Thread

[newworldafro]

I had no intention of merging anything. I thought they you guys were starting this one because that other one had gotten to lengthy. Which is why I said, is the point for me to put a link in here (or for the OP to do so) and then continue you on with this one instead? It just looks kind of foolish for there to be a stickied thread and then another conspiracy theory thread. I guess what I'm saying is, you guys have to decide which one you want to post in. I was about to retire the other thread. But I'll merge it if you guys would rather that.

When you say retire? do you mean not having it stickied and locking it up???

I would at least put a link and title to the first one.....I'm on the fence with this one..

 

[No1]

When you say retire? do you mean not having it stickied and locking it up???

I would at least put a link and title to the first one.....I'm on the fence with this one..

I n that it would not be stickied anymore and it would potentially be put in the "bushes" forum. So yeah, you could still read it, but you wouldn't be posting in it anymore. I guess I could always just unsticky it and leave it alone.

 

[Rarely-Wrong Liggins]

You should lock the old one but keep it stickied and also sticky this one.

 

[irishfury]

Loves Conspiracy threads

 

[RugbyMan]

Post on Free Energy suppression and the intentional creation of HIV/AIDS coming soon

 

[The_King_of_Everything]

The majority of the episodes are on YouTube not really a conspiracy more like reality and fact of how media has fukked us all up.

 

[OsO]

people people... listen to logic... why make another conspiracy thread when we already have the first one? because now if we want to reference stuff from the first thread we gotta go diggin through archives instead of just looking through the one thread. keep it simple


edit: keep the title the same "Conspiracy 2.0," but at least MERGE the threads so we aint gotta go diggin to narnia to get the info from the first conspiracy thread. there is no logical advantage in not merging the two.

 

[TheGodGenesDecoded]

people people... listen to logic... why make another conspiracy thread when we already have the first one? because now if we want to reference stuff from the first thread we gotta go diggin through archives instead of just looking through the one thread. keep it simple


edit: keep the title the same "Conspiracy 2.0," but at least MERGE the threads so we aint gotta go diggin to narnia to get the info from the first conspiracy thread. there is no logical advantage in not merging the two.

 

[newworldafro]

OP, can you keep the connective tissue and put at the very top of your first post, something like "Continued from original Conspiracy Thread" with the link.......that way we still have that reference readily available???.....

 

[Maumee]

does anyone really believe planes didnt bring down the towers? i just watched that vid. interesting for a minute but stupid by about 20 minutes in.

 

[Ghost of $oCal]

pointless to make a new thread.

 

[O.iatlhawksfan]

Would y'all stop crying bout a new thread

 

[FUTUREVISIONS]

If you're gonna do that tomorrow, create a "Conspiracy Thread Re-up" or something and drop it in there. This thread has fizzled out.

kinda like this 2.0.. smh.. fail

 

[The_King_of_Everything]

I wonder this London Olympic false flag shyt is really gonna happen

 

[Christian3o5]

The real reason we never went back to the Moon