Conservatives win legal battle against the fearless fund

[yung Herbie Hancock]

Today A federal judge ruled that fearless fund is unconstitutional. This happened after Edward Blum started attacking all DEI related organizations. After this they will probably go after HBCUs.

A grant program for Black women business owners is discriminatory, appeals court rules

A U.S. federal court of appeals panel suspended a venture capital firm’s grant program for Black women business owners on Monday, ruling that a conservative group is likely to prevail in its lawsuit claiming that the program is discriminatory.

www.click2houston.com

 

[Animal House]

Damn!

Not surprised cacs ain’t shyt

 

[Ski Mask]

The days of being overt is over. nikkas going to have to adopt the lee Atwater approach and stop announcing shyt.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

The sisters moved sloppy. You don't straight up say your money is exclusive for Black women, you only give it to Black women and say they were the, "only ones that we felt were qualified".

 

[CreepyMcCreeperson]

The sisters moved sloppy. You don't straight up say your money is exclusive for Black women, you only give it to Black women and say they were the, "only ones that we felt were qualified".

I’ve been saying this about everything, especially if a black person is in charge of hiring people, or choosing winners. Just hire the black people, and if they notice just say,



“Are you accusing me of being racist? I am simply hiring the best people for the job”

 

[yung Herbie Hancock]

The days of being overt is over. nikkas going to have to adopt the lee Atwater approach and stop announcing shyt.

What white folks do is have it open to everyone and then find a way to narrow it down to specific people.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

People are talking about being more covert, but that doesn't matter with Edward Blum and his ilk. This isn't about 'exclusive' framing, because many funds are set up that exclusively target Asian-Americans, Latinos, etc., and they are being left alone in this so-called reverse discrimination fight. These people will go after anything that even has the whiff of favoring Black people. They have millions of dollars backing them and a deep network of whites, Asians, and Hispanics working with them too.

 

[yung Herbie Hancock]

The sisters moved sloppy. You don't straight up say your money is exclusive for Black women, you only give it to Black women and say they were the, "only ones that we felt were qualified".

But that opens up space to getting sued. When Harvard got sued by students for fair admissions, the prosecutors showed a list of SAT scores as their argument. In this case, other groups will ask "why were all of the grant recipients black women" or something.

 

[Geode]

What white folks do is NOT have it open to everyone and then find a way to narrow it down to specific people. give it to their friends. And get away with it.

FTFY

 

[DrBanneker]

After this they will probably go after HBCUs.

HBCUs don't explicitly admit on race so they are probably ok short term. Black scholarships and Black admissions in medical school and law are what they discuss most.

 

[Uachet]

We have to learn to use other designators that allow us to help each other without them being able to claim it is racism. Religion for one would probably work. Essays is another way, since judging them is subjective. Need to lean on that plausible deniability tactic that they use very heavily against us.

 

[DrBanneker]

Religion for one would probably work.

Good thought, but try getting young people in church today. I know, I attend.

Decentralized organizations and informal networks gonna have to be a thing again.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

But that opens up space to getting sued. When Harvard got sued by students for fair admissions, the prosecutors showed a list of SAT scores as their argument. In this case, other groups will ask "why were all of the grant recipients black women" or something.

Culture fit.
Mission objectives.
Zipcodes.
Interviews.

There are dozens of ways to make the results what you want without giving them a window. Trump judges made it a requirement to show demonstrable and obvious discrimination for a case to move forward. Disparate impact no longer qualifies.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Culture fit.
Mission objectives.
Zipcodes.
Interviews.

There are dozens of ways to make the results what you want without giving them a window. Trump judges made it a requirement to show demonstrable and obvious discrimination for a case to move forward. Disparate impact no longer qualifies.

wont work.

The next play is to also target other placeholders you mentioned.

They will argue that “they’re using zip codes to replace race or approximate race and thus this is discriminatory against [insert pet group]"

It’s a narrower argument, but they’re trying to salt the earth and remove any overt attempt at minority businesses.

 

[BaggerofTea]

the only way to rectify this outside of the unmentionables is to vote