Come & Let Us Pay Homage to these Forgotten Nickelodeon TV Shows :wow:

Piffery

All Star
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
1,477
Reputation
-1,380
Daps
2,657
All three networks fell off(although cartoon network is doing better than recent years).

Kids these days definitely don't have the variety that we had growing up.

For every gumball I can name you 3 or 4 shows that's just as good if not better than that.:yeshrug:

Regular show is the only one that gets a cosign.:dame:
I think this is pure nostalgia.
Also Gumball>>>Regular Show imo.
But okay:
Regular Show
Gravity Fall
Steven Universe
Gumball
(How far are we going back for new cartoons? When Chowder and Flapjack were on air?)
Now match up and we'll keep going.
 

Box Cutta

Bumbling Sidekick
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,784
Reputation
2,364
Daps
39,490
Reppin
Sanitation Department
On the contrary. Cartoon network had all the triple og classic shyt plus the new classics like Johnny and dexter, not to mention 24hrs. None of that nick news or nick at nite bullshyt, none of that baby bullshyt in the morning. Nickelodeon had all that wack ass live action shyt. :dead: at a nikka in here pumping up brothers Garcia. The cartoons fell off hard after the original nicktoons. I'm not sayinh all the shyt was wack, there was a lot of filler though.


I moved from la to the burbs in 99. Burbs ain't have cartoon network yet. That shyt was so weak breh. Had a taste of the good life and then had the shyt taken from me. :to:
You're trippin' breh.

The fact that Nickelodeon focused so heavily on block-programming is what made it so good. They had clear programming blocks designed to do different things and it all led up to Saturday night SNICK.

And how dare you with "wack ass live action shyt"....:birdman: The live-action was the MAIN drawing point to the channel. Family gameshows (Double Dare). Competitive gameshows (GUTS). Comedies (Salute Your Shorts). Variety Shows (All That). Sci-Fi (Alex Mack). Horror (Are You Afraid Of The Dark). Borderline surrealism like Pete & Pete. Just too much piff to drop. The thread speaks for itself....:manny:

If it's JUST cartoons we are talking about, well maybe CN gets the W. But even that's questionable to me. I'll put Ren & Stimpy, Hey Arnold, Roccos Modern Life, & Doug up against any 4 cartoons from any other network. And I'm not even throwing in shyt like Rugrats, Ahh Real Monsters, etc.

Nick also had a ton of diversity. Girls/Boys. Racial diversity. I understand that it was JUST a channel and therefore money over everything, but looking back, I get a very strong sense that they were actually trying to be socially responsible. Once the Disney channel took off, I felt like BLACK BOYS in particular never really got a foothold in kids-programming again. It was all about young white/white-hispanic girls. Did Disney ever produce a Kenan & Kel? A My Brother & Me? A Cousin Skeeter? Nick Arcade? Jett Jackson is the only one I can remember. I'm not sure what these young brothers have nowadays, I hope they have something besides twitter/instagram and the news telling them how worthless the country thinks they are.

And you're missing the strength of nick-at-nite. Yeah, asking kids to watch old ass TV shows might have been a hard pill to swallow, but many of us DID in fact tune in to watch that stuff. I'm personally glad that I got to experience Lucille Ball, Lavern & Shirley, Happy Days, Mary Tyler Moore, Bewitched, I Dream Of Jeannie, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, etc etc etc as a kid/pre-teen in the 90's. That's a lot of classic TV breh. While I was watching classic I Love Lucy skits and learning about the nuance of comedy and comedic timing, you were out here watching....Space Ghost Coast To Coast....:mjlol:

CN was good for some fukkery here and there, don't get me wrong. But I feel like CN was *just* a network, while Nickelodeon carved out this space as almost as this mixture of network/lifestyle brand/development/education/movement. The fact that you're dissing Nick News, an attempt to teach kids a surface level understanding of some key issues in the world at large, speaks volumes.

There is actually a lot more that could be said about the channel during its height but I've already "written a book" so I'll leave it at that for now.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
18,744
Reputation
1,071
Daps
49,869
Gumball>>>Regular Show imo.
But okay:
Regular Show
Gravity Fall
Steven Universe
Gumball
(How far are we going back for new cartoons? When Chowder and Flapjack were on air?)
Now match up and we'll keep going.

Hey arnold
Courage the cowardly dog
Jimmy neutron
Chalk zone
Invader zim
Rugrats
Rocko`s modern life
Bill & mandy
Dexter laboratory
Johnny bravo
Ed Edd n Eddy
Powerpuff girls

You can include when chowder and flapjack was on the air.
 

cartierhoe

Veteran
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
24,394
Reputation
8,468
Daps
116,294
Reppin
South Florida
You're trippin' breh.

The fact that Nickelodeon focused so heavily on block-programming is what made it so good. They had clear programming blocks designed to do different things and it all led up to Saturday night SNICK.

And how dare you with "wack ass live action shyt"....:birdman: The live-action was the MAIN drawing point to the channel. Family gameshows (Double Dare). Competitive gameshows (GUTS). Comedies (Salute Your Shorts). Variety Shows (All That). Sci-Fi (Alex Mack). Horror (Are You Afraid Of The Dark). Borderline surrealism like Pete & Pete. Just too much piff to drop. The thread speaks for itself....:manny:

If it's JUST cartoons we are talking about, well maybe CN gets the W. But even that's questionable to me. I'll put Ren & Stimpy, Hey Arnold, Roccos Modern Life, & Doug up against any 4 cartoons from any other network. And I'm not even throwing in shyt like Rugrats, Ahh Real Monsters, etc.

Nick also had a ton of diversity. Girls/Boys. Racial diversity. I understand that it was JUST a channel and therefore money over everything, but looking back, I get a very strong sense that they were actually trying to be socially responsible. Once the Disney channel took off, I felt like BLACK BOYS in particular never really got a foothold in kids-programming again. It was all about young white/white-hispanic girls. Did Disney ever produce a Kenan & Kel? A My Brother & Me? A Cousin Skeeter? Nick Arcade? Jett Jackson is the only one I can remember. I'm not sure what these young brothers have nowadays, I hope they have something besides twitter/instagram and the news telling them how worthless the country thinks they are.

And you're missing the strength of nick-at-nite. Yeah, asking kids to watch old ass TV shows might have been a hard pill to swallow, but many of us DID in fact tune in to watch that stuff. I'm personally glad that I got to experience Lucille Ball, Lavern & Shirley, Happy Days, Mary Tyler Moore, Bewitched, I Dream Of Jeannie, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, etc etc etc as a kid/pre-teen in the 90's. That's a lot of classic TV breh. While I was watching classic I Love Lucy skits and learning about the nuance of comedy and comedic timing, you were out here watching....Space Ghost Coast To Coast....:mjlol:

CN was good for some fukkery here and there, don't get me wrong. But I feel like CN was *just* a network, while Nickelodeon carved out this space as almost as this mixture of network/lifestyle brand/development/education/movement. The fact that you're dissing Nick News, an attempt to teach kids a surface level understanding of some key issues in the world at large, speaks volumes.

There is actually a lot more that could be said about the channel during its height but I've already "written a book" so I'll leave it at that for now.
Damn, you made an excellent point, good read :ehh:
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
39,793
Reputation
2,132
Daps
98,843
Only people who don't watch modern cartoons he the gall to say this.
I think back to a lot of the old cartoons we watched and so much of it was nonsensical gross out stuff and repetitive plots.
shyt like Gumball (an incredibly smart show), Adventure Time, Steven Universe, Wander over Yonder, and more, are cartoons as good as they ever were.
But then again you wouldn't know that.
Breh what cartoons did you watch? I have seen some modern cartoons and the animation is weird and off putting. A lot of sexual innuendos and just weird things in general. And a bunch of nonsense. I can name a bunch of cartoons in the 2000s that taught values, character, etc.
 

Chris Cool

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,059
Reputation
7,091
Daps
109,496
Reppin
So Cal
You're trippin' breh.

The fact that Nickelodeon focused so heavily on block-programming is what made it so good. They had clear programming blocks designed to do different things and it all led up to Saturday night SNICK.

And how dare you with "wack ass live action shyt"....:birdman: The live-action was the MAIN drawing point to the channel. Family gameshows (Double Dare). Competitive gameshows (GUTS). Comedies (Salute Your Shorts). Variety Shows (All That). Sci-Fi (Alex Mack). Horror (Are You Afraid Of The Dark). Borderline surrealism like Pete & Pete. Just too much piff to drop. The thread speaks for itself....:manny:

If it's JUST cartoons we are talking about, well maybe CN gets the W. But even that's questionable to me. I'll put Ren & Stimpy, Hey Arnold, Roccos Modern Life, & Doug up against any 4 cartoons from any other network. And I'm not even throwing in shyt like Rugrats, Ahh Real Monsters, etc.

Nick also had a ton of diversity. Girls/Boys. Racial diversity. I understand that it was JUST a channel and therefore money over everything, but looking back, I get a very strong sense that they were actually trying to be socially responsible. Once the Disney channel took off, I felt like BLACK BOYS in particular never really got a foothold in kids-programming again. It was all about young white/white-hispanic girls. Did Disney ever produce a Kenan & Kel? A My Brother & Me? A Cousin Skeeter? Nick Arcade? Jett Jackson is the only one I can remember. I'm not sure what these young brothers have nowadays, I hope they have something besides twitter/instagram and the news telling them how worthless the country thinks they are.

And you're missing the strength of nick-at-nite. Yeah, asking kids to watch old ass TV shows might have been a hard pill to swallow, but many of us DID in fact tune in to watch that stuff. I'm personally glad that I got to experience Lucille Ball, Lavern & Shirley, Happy Days, Mary Tyler Moore, Bewitched, I Dream Of Jeannie, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, etc etc etc as a kid/pre-teen in the 90's. That's a lot of classic TV breh. While I was watching classic I Love Lucy skits and learning about the nuance of comedy and comedic timing, you were out here watching....Space Ghost Coast To Coast....:mjlol:

CN was good for some fukkery here and there, don't get me wrong. But I feel like CN was *just* a network, while Nickelodeon carved out this space as almost as this mixture of network/lifestyle brand/development/education/movement. The fact that you're dissing Nick News, an attempt to teach kids a surface level understanding of some key issues in the world at large, speaks volumes.

There is actually a lot more that could be said about the channel during its height but I've already "written a book" so I'll leave it at that for now.
all that shyt you hyping weak breh. :manny: i mentioned the cool shyt but the rest was simply tolerated. You hyping up nick at night like it was some shyt i missed out on, i already mention i didn't have cartoon network a lot of the time. You hype i love lucy but that shyt was weak as fukk to me. If i wanted some comedy I could just go in the room with my mom and watch martin. :manny: not that corny shyt. :dead: at me shytting on nick news soaking volumes. :heh: like they was putting kids on game and shyt.
 
Top