But isn't that how it SHOULD work? Isn't that part of the strategy? Like with Matt Harvey, for example. I can keep him THROUGH this season, to have him as a mid-round keeper for the following year, or I drop him and see what happens... Isn't that the risk you run by dropping a great player for an injury? Somebody picks him up and gets a value bump?
I could be misreading the idea behind a league like this... but keeping a player's tag after they've been dropped - when they become by definition a free agent - seems to go against the entire strategy behind the keeper league.
I know where you're coming from, but your example is flawed.
First off, mid-season drops are different than not keeping someone. And players who are going to miss the rest of this upcoming season are also different.
If you hold on to Harvey, he still holds tremendous keeper value to you. Braun/Kemp/Bautista/etc as a 1st rounders doesn't really have that same value. But they would have ridiculous value as 15th round players. And the player who had to drop them wouldn't have any shot at them because of Yahoo rules.
Furthermore, a player who was dropped and added would have their "contract" reset, which would allow someone to keep Ryan Braun has a 15th rounder for 2 years. That's an absurd advantage imo.
Hypothetically we could make them lose keeper status if they cleared waivers, but that would give a huge advantage to whoever stays up until 4AM refreshing their browser over and over
And I would definitely be that guy.
And I think what Kev was saying is that we've always ran it this way.