captaincharisma
***** PLATINUM *****
Who is he saying is a sucker. Meltzer didn't write anything. No one cared about his tweet at all.
phil prob mad about that internet report about how he only has the title cause of the rock
Who is he saying is a sucker. Meltzer didn't write anything. No one cared about his tweet at all.
phil prob mad about that internet report about how he only has the title cause of the rock
I really don't understand this obsession withTerrible article. I have no issue with Punk but for some reason he does spout off at people as if he's on a Rock or Austin or Hogan level and in the meantime the ratings keep coming in and week after week Punk is actually losing viewers.
WWE has tried everything they can to help this guy reach and achieve stardom and it's just not working.
![]()
You do have to consider that Meltzer isn't always "fair and balanced", if he is ever. It'd be virtually impossible to be, to be fair.
Some wrestlers get off on divulging inside information to the dirt sheets, while others don't talk to them at all. There's a lot of middle ground of course.
I always feel he is. He gives everyone a fair shot, and says when a segment sucks no matter what. It is his opinion though.
But, for example, for you Shawn Michaels supporters, he lambasts Michaels drawing power in the mid 90s but still thinks he is one of the best wrestlers ever.
For the CM Punk fans, he does think Punk is great, but notes how he is probably the lowest rated/watched WWE Champions in the last 15 years (and backs that up with facts/numbers).
Man, the biz is decaying into some ultra-fukkery as the days go on![]()
It's actually almost the complete opposite of walking on eggshells.The Rock's impending return has the IWC, Punk, and whiners walking on eggshells. It's really entertaining.![]()