AquaCityBoy
Veteran
You nikkas talking blasphemous over here.
Dogma is the goat ks flick
Second GOAT.
Clerks 3
- Thread starter Conz
- Start date
You nikkas talking blasphemous over here.
Second GOAT.
gameover82
Pro
clerks will always be his best work
Top tier Kevin Smith films are . . .
Clerks I
Mallrats
Dogma
Chasing Amy
. . . in whichever order.
Everything else is just competing for 5th best.
Clerks 3 will probably suck, but I won't blame him for seeking one last payday.
Clerks I
Mallrats
Dogma
Chasing Amy
. . . in whichever order.
Everything else is just competing for 5th best.
Clerks 3 will probably suck, but I won't blame him for seeking one last payday.
Bob Loblaw
Superstar
I know it won't be black and white but I hope it's not bright as fukk like 2. It looked like the 6th season of Scrubs.
OmegaK2099
Gettin' It In
Mallrats
Chasing Amy
jay and silent bob
Dogma
>>>>>
Chasing Amy
jay and silent bob
Dogma
>>>>>
Bob Loblaw
Superstar
Watching Dogma right now, this was my introduction to View Askew. Only Kevin Smith can make a movie about religion entertaining to me, getting across all of his views without going over my head and making me laugh at the same time. All of Matt Damon's cleansings were fukking ill. Definitely my favorite of them all and I don't even like religious flicks like that but this was like a Star Wars epic to me with all of the different teams' journeys to Jersey. GOAT Smith joint
Clerks 3 can't be worse than 2, I'll be there opening day Lord willing
Clerks 3 can't be worse than 2, I'll be there opening day Lord willing
Zombi_Jeezus
Bad Hombre
I've been a kevin smith fan since og clerks. def looking forward tothis.
I'm gonna see this, but it'll be interesting to see what it's really about. Clerks 2 was timed/put together at a perfect time for the characters, and the audience that the original was aimed at. Would there be much new to say in the 7-8 years between the second and third movies? Watch this shyt be all serious since Smith has gotten extra emotional in recent years.
Rosario 
But real talk, that fadeout at the Quick Stop was the GOAT way to end it. The fukk he got for us now?
But real talk, that fadeout at the Quick Stop was the GOAT way to end it. The fukk he got for us now?
yseJ
Empire strikes back
og clerks one of fav movies ever
dogma second best ks movie imo, by a lot
clerks 2 was actually much better than I thought it'd be, altho its not touching the first.
at this point tho, Id be surprised if clerks 3 is anything decent
dogma second best ks movie imo, by a lot
clerks 2 was actually much better than I thought it'd be, altho its not touching the first.
at this point tho, Id be surprised if clerks 3 is anything decent
ball comes.
prophecypro
Hollywood North
Cool, I guess. I hope he does it right but it'll be interesting to see what the reception will be. Kevin is still my dude.
btw Smodcast=
been listening to it for years (aint really got into the other pods on the network except Fatman on Batman. Need to catch up on the others)
SHEKY!!!
btw Smodcast=
been listening to it for years (aint really got into the other pods on the network except Fatman on Batman. Need to catch up on the others)
SHEKY!!!
prophecypro
Hollywood North
$15 little man, put that shyt inside my hand 
So, Kevin Smith did a podcast about this and the legal situation is fukked up. This won't be out for a while.
Apparently, to get the guy who plays Randall on board, they took a sweat equity deal from the Weinsteins. Smith, Scott Mosier, and the guys who played Randall and Dante were paid $100k each up front, and would get a percentage of the movie's profits. Smith gave Randall his $100k.
So, the movie comes out, and allegedly makes a decent profit. To this day, none of them have seen any of the money they were supposed to get. So, they recently decided to audit The Weinstein Company on the production of the movie to see if they got fukked, because they think they did.
But the Weinsteins have first refusal rights, and a second lo option on any Clerks 2 sequel, and the guy who plays Randall doesn't want to do the movie if the Weinsteins are involved.
And they have no financing behind the movie, either (this dude was talking about crowdsourcing
)
So, no money, what looks like a rights battle coming up, and the cast isn't confirmed yet (Randall won't sign on until the Weinstein's are completely out). Why was this shyt announced, b?
Apparently, to get the guy who plays Randall on board, they took a sweat equity deal from the Weinsteins. Smith, Scott Mosier, and the guys who played Randall and Dante were paid $100k each up front, and would get a percentage of the movie's profits. Smith gave Randall his $100k.
So, the movie comes out, and allegedly makes a decent profit. To this day, none of them have seen any of the money they were supposed to get. So, they recently decided to audit The Weinstein Company on the production of the movie to see if they got fukked, because they think they did.
But the Weinsteins have first refusal rights, and a second lo option on any Clerks 2 sequel, and the guy who plays Randall doesn't want to do the movie if the Weinsteins are involved.
And they have no financing behind the movie, either (this dude was talking about crowdsourcing
)So, no money, what looks like a rights battle coming up, and the cast isn't confirmed yet (Randall won't sign on until the Weinstein's are completely out). Why was this shyt announced, b?