Chris Cuomo throwing shade at the democrats from the DNC floor. No lies

RickyDiBiase

aka Hash Brown Hands
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
18,861
Reputation
3,237
Daps
78,446
Reppin
Cbus
He's not wrong.

The optics are especially terrible when all these celebrities, donor, elites and even Republicans are paraded front and center at the DNC while pro Palestine protesters are marching outside, and not a single Palestinian will get even a second of stage time at the convention.

Ya’ll fall for concern trolling so easily
 

Timbs

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
1,324
Reputation
280
Daps
3,198
Money will always talk. With that being said if the Dems can find a way to fix the Supreme Court and re-approve the Roe v. Wade decision within the next 2 terms it will be better than the damage Republicans have caused and are still planning.
 

ORDER_66

I am The Wrench in all your plans....
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
150,740
Reputation
17,111
Daps
596,132
Reppin
Queens,NY
Money will always talk. With that being said if the Dems can find a way to fix the Supreme Court and re-approve the Roe v. Wade decision within the next 2 terms it will be better than the damage Republicans have caused and are still planning.

That's not what this thread is about....:mjlol:
 

Pull Up the Roots

Breakfast for dinner.
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
25,023
Reputation
11,854
Daps
108,115
Reppin
Detroit
I'm sick of 'optics.' None of this stopped Lina Khan from being appointed or the FTC and DOL going after corporations. The NLRB would have been gutted under this administration, like the last one, if we were to go by what these people believe. That's not to say that campaign finance reform isn't needed, because it is, but I'm not naive enough to believe unilateral disarmament will benefit anyone other than the Right. I'm more concerned about getting rid of people like Blinken and the rest of the State Department ghouls.

Don't forget "but Trump!!"
The closer we get to the election, the more transparent you become. It's obvious you want another Trump term in the hopes that he'd be softer on Russia.
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
15,471
Reputation
11,184
Daps
96,735
Reppin
McDowell's
The closer we get to the election, the more transparent you become. It's obvious you want another Trump term in the hopes that he'd be softer on Russia.
Go ahead and find posts and quote me on what leads you to this conclusion. Let's move beyond hearsay and into facts, if it's so obvious.
 

LeVraiPapi

Redemption is Coming
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
17,527
Reputation
4,149
Daps
55,398
The issue here is the fact that nobody cares and the fact that all those rich people at the DNC do not mind paying more. Mark Cuban is a billionaire and he advocated for more taxes. Draymond another DNC billionaire does not mind paying either. None of them has asked for more tax cuts or says they are not willing to pay more of their fair share. I don’t see what the issue is. Those rich donors wanna pay more taxes. Lmao


Chris knows very well what he did but @ORDER_66 was calling him Fredo and all kinda names when he used to be on CNN though :dead:
 

ORDER_66

I am The Wrench in all your plans....
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
150,740
Reputation
17,111
Daps
596,132
Reppin
Queens,NY
The issue here is the fact that nobody cares and the fact that all those rich people at the DNC do not mind paying more. Mark Cuban is a billionaire and he advocated for more taxes. Draymond another DNC billionaire does not mind paying either. None of them has asked for more tax cuts or says they are not willing to pay more of their fair share. I don’t see what the issue is. Those rich donors wanna pay more taxes. Lmao


Chris knows very well what he did but @ORDER_66 was calling him Fredo and all kinda names when he used to be on CNN though :dead:

I didnt care about him being at cnn so why the fukk you lying on me for???:dahell: damn nikkas lying on shyt I never even said...:mjlol:
 

UpNext

Superstar
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
5,498
Reputation
2,508
Daps
20,494

Prince.Skeletor

Don’t Be Like He-Man
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
30,064
Reputation
-6,869
Daps
58,927
Reppin
Bucktown
That's exactly what he's talking about.

He's saying that it's laughable that these politicians will stand up to millionaires and billionaires whilst those same millionaires and billionaires are literally looking down at them from seats that cost more money than people's houses in the convention.

Then goes on to talk about campaign funding records being broken and how much money is involved in politics.

The above is true, but the above has nothing to do within the context of what he's saying to the below

So then what I want to know is, does that then mean he wants workers to get a bigger share of the pie by supporting their right to bargain collectively? Does he want the economy controlled by unions and worker co-ops instead of CEOs making millions of dollars a year while doing a fraction of the work that the staff they "manage" are doing?

Is he going to then say "and that's why we need more candidates who's donations are only through crowds. No corporate donors. People like Jill stein, people like Claudia de la Cruz. They actually represent a socialist perspective that's sorely needed in this country and we're working on getting some interviews with them to get their thoughts on what's going on with labor in America and separate the fact from fiction in some of the speeches we're hearing today at the convention."

Or is this just him saying "these guys are hypocrites! Dont believe what they say!" Over and over again in different ways.

See he wasn't even talking about that.
This is the problem, people point out those that speak the truth but then focus way too much on intent.
Forget the intent, understand whether what he is saying is true or not and devise your own intent.

People have muddied the waters too much when it comes to news vs commentary.
You should always prioritize news over commentary.
And in no way am I a Cuomo fan, it's like fukk him, but what he saying here is true. Focus on the truth not on the person saying it or intent.
 

KidJSoul

Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
19,536
Reputation
4,122
Daps
85,317
That's exactly what he's talking about.

He's saying that it's laughable that these politicians will stand up to millionaires and billionaires whilst those same millionaires and billionaires are literally looking down at them from seats that cost more money than people's houses in the convention.

Then goes on to talk about campaign funding records being broken and how much money is involved in politics.

So then what I want to know is, does that then mean he wants workers to get a bigger share of the pie by supporting their right to bargain collectively? Does he want the economy controlled by unions and worker co-ops instead of CEOs making millions of dollars a year while doing a fraction of the work that the staff they "manage" are doing?

Is he going to then say "and that's why we need more candidates who's donations are only through crowds. No corporate donors. People like Jill stein, people like Claudia de la Cruz. They actually represent a socialist perspective that's sorely needed in this country and we're working on getting some interviews with them to get their thoughts on what's going on with labor in America and separate the fact from fiction in some of the speeches we're hearing today at the convention."

Or is this just him saying "these guys are hypocrites! Dont believe what they say!" Over and over again in different ways.
This

What he's saying is true, but hos intentions behind are no better since he probably isn't standing up for what he thinks
 
Top