Nobody called you a name. You responded to me, speaking about "the word" from a position that presupposes your religious beliefs to be true. I casually told you I think it's bullshyt, then clarified my statement about jesus freaks because you asked. Then you got all hurt and sensitive. It's not a big deal.
I wouldn't vote for the guy, but I think Christie running as the Republican presidential nominee could be a good thing for the country. Finally we maybe wouldn't have one candidate acquiescing to the religious socially conservative cac vote like the GOP has been doing for the last 35 years.
And it could maybe restructure the electoral map some. Maybe he would lose some traditionally red states and win some traditionally blue states.
That could maybe help bring the country together by making it less polarized with northern and coastal liberal states vs. southern and middle American conservative red states. Evangelical social conservatives are fukking up the game for everyone by creating wedges. It's time for them to go so we can get back to focusing on important matters and not who loves Jesus and America more.
I don't believe in this theory, because those stupid voters are still alive.
So a Christie nomination only hides those crazy folks from the public view.
You can tell Christie literally told Romney to fukk off when he asked to take a tour of the disaster
Romney: Ayo Chris ya boy needs a photo op. Hook me up with a tour, dun
Christie: callin my building and I ain't even give you my numbers. fukkouttahere
Romney:
They showed it. After Christie smacked 'em up they have no choice to just step back and actually report news.
Christie is looking good for 2016. I truly believe he doesn't give a fukk about the elections and wants to help his Jersey citizens but he also knows that this is the right route to take politically.. throw Romney in the bushes.
I wouldn't vote for the guy, but I think Christie running as the Republican presidential nominee could be a good thing for the country. Finally we maybe wouldn't have one candidate acquiescing to the religious socially conservative cac vote like the GOP has been doing for the last 35 years.
And it could maybe restructure the electoral map some. Maybe he would lose some traditionally red states and win some traditionally blue states.
That could maybe help bring the country together by making it less polarized with northern and coastal liberal states vs. southern and middle American conservative red states. Evangelical social conservatives are fukking up the game for everyone by creating wedges. It's time for them to go so we can get back to focusing on important matters and not who loves Jesus and America more.
It's politics. What's refreshing about Christie is he's logical enough to realize what the right thing to do is. I don't think his intent was to slight Romney. Jersey is under water. The President clearly wants to help.
Asking municipalities to cut back is the logical thing to do. This is why Christie is so popular...its his frankness.
He sees the lane for a new moderate Republican who isn't a religious social conservative.
Yes, but you don't have to cede power to them to get their vote. The Repubs went too far with it and created a Bible-thumping racist Frankenstein monster under Karl Rove. The nuts started running the party and alienating everyone else. It would be in the Republican party's interest, not just the nation's interest to stop letting them dictate their agenda much.