China’s Male Leaders Signal to Women That Their Place Is in the Home

[Lonj]

Japanese culture is notorious for its emphasis on tradition, conformity, and heirarchy. Their suicide rate speaks for itself.

Japanese having high suicide rates is a meme, their rates aren't even that high even among only developed countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

Now S Korea on the other hand

 

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

Like a moth to a flame; of course people in here would like an article like this

 

[cauliflower]

These policies will turn women off from having children even more. Chinese feminists are actually about that shyt too.

 

[ColdSlither]

Probably because the prospects of their job market is in the toilet, and they don't have the birth numbers to replace workers for all these various jobs at all experience levels. So this is them attempting to take women out of the equation to compensate.

 

[Black Hans]

Both liberalism and conservatism can build and destroy societies. Each have elements that can do either. It's more like, the ways of God lead to prosperity and the outside of that leads to destruction and chaos.

 

[BlackJesus]

Those are values anyone can possess and have nothing to do with being conservative.

Only conservatives believe that they are the only ones who believe in these things

Typical coli ninja reply "ANyOne CaN Do ThAt".

Coli goofs always make the mistake of thinking as individuals when referring to collectivist cultures. As if being a random individual who believes it proves some kind of point.

Japan's and much of Asia's entire society revolves around these concepts. That's what makes them conservative *cultures*. It's a culture. Duh

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

@38:30 they basically say when real estate prices go up, marriage rates go down. cost of living absolutely have an impact on whether or not people look to marry and choose to have children. by and large the most educated generation in the history of the world isn't going to knowingly make life harder for themselves by having children they can't afford. china has a 9-9-6 culture which doesn't leave much time to socialize and raise a family. women have to be choosy too since where a man lives determines what school they can go to and what government services they can get in a particular area.

japanese woman have said they don't want to be saddled with all the responsibility of raising children and dealing with in-laws when their husband is constantly working which is understandable. it's more difficult to save and provide for a single person in most first-world countries including japan.

like i said the cause is different in both societies but the effect is the same. they have rejected traditional expectations

Japanese culture is notorious for its emphasis on tradition, conformity, and heirarchy. Their suicide rate speaks for itself.

yes

a woman who has a family would usually be held back from promotions to encourage her being at home, having a family was a career killer. women start opting to not follow that traditional path but the coli says it's economics pushing the gender divide.

ok.

 

[bnew]

like i said the cause is different in both societies but the effect is the same. they have rejected traditional expectations

yes

a woman who has a family would usually be held back from promotions to encourage her being at home, having a family was a career killer. women start opting to not follow that traditional path but the coli says it's economics pushing the gender divide.

ok.

so you admit that a womans economic prospects become limited/diminished when she has a child unlike when a man becomes a father and that they reject doing so to maintain and advance their economic/professional status.

 

[papa pimp]

so you admit that a womans economic prospects become limited/diminished when she has a child unlike when a man becomes a father and that they reject doing so to maintain and advance their economic/professional status.

Bro, why bother? Dude is cleary slow.

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

so you admit that a womans economic prospects become limited/diminished when she has a child unlike when a man becomes a father and that they reject doing so to maintain and advance their economic/professional status.

nothing of the sort

*career

ambitious women are held back by tradition. i literally told you bosses cap their ladder climbing if they have children as a tradition in Japanese work life to push them home. Women don't want to limit their careers and options because of old traditions. if they could have families and it doesn't affect their career goals they might be open to but that's not what happens there they are EXPECTED to stay home and be homemakers.

i didn't say shyt you saying nice try tho.

Japan: reasons not to marry among women 2022 | Statista

Reluctance to give up their freedom was a common reason why single women in Japan did not want to marry.

www.statista.com

read that list then continue arguing with yourselves for the sake of pride

 

[NZA]

men are both a gift and a curse to women. women expect men to be more gift than curse, but women working means a man's money isnt much of a gift, but he still brings the same curses. now women are just not that interested in men anymore.

basically, PAAGs can take themselves on a solo date to the noodle factory. she needs you to take her to some place with a michelin star, but you cant afford that because you sit next to her on the iphone assembly line.

 

[Cynic]

What type of offpoint & half-baked tripe is this?

What’s the correlation between my post & this incoherent nonsense?

I’m not anti-immigration - I just alluded to western countries using immigration to supplement its workforce as a remedy for low birth rate vis-a-vis China embracing conservatism to solve the same problem (caused by China’s liberal family planning policy).

To cater to your offpoint babble:

The reality is that: immigration is a short-term fix. You can bury your head in the sand if you want but indigenous population will always be weary of immigrants, as the racial demographic changes (it’s already happening all over the west with the rise of ultra-nationalists).And it might eventually lead to a race war - hence I alluded to western countries hitting the reset button in future.

I know a lot of you lack self-awareness & you live in your own little bubble. But as a black person, the focus should be on how we’ll liberate our home countries & break the shackles of external imperialism that has kept them underdeveloped - rather than get triggered when people cite the realities of immigration & the dangers ahead. It’s a powder keg that will explode soon.

BTW, technology is mostly driven by militarism - by virtue of that, it’s conservative.

Also, I’m neither a conservative nor a liberal - I don’t do isms.

I won’t address the race-war nonsense. That’s too sensationalist and dumb to even consider.

The tenements of innovation rest on change through experimentation and creativity. That’s not what conservatives do

Conservative societies value order and keeping things as is. Progressives are alll about upending everything and pushing for change. This is a non-starter for conservatives because it presents chaos and uncontrollable variables but they end up yielding anyway.

Go look up what the conservative agrarian farmers in America thought about industrialized factories … what the church thought of science…what western union said about the telephone…

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

tank your economy by limiting women brehs

 

[Dr. Acula]

Not saying everything about liberal is bad. However, when it becomes extreme - it creates a degenerate society that destroys the natural order. And that’s basically what we’re seeing in today’s world.

The same is applicable to conservatism when it’s extreme & its penchant to create stunted insular societies.

But it has to be in moderation whilst tilting more towards conservatism.

Natural order.

Does that include racial hierarchies as well? Just curious. Because natural order is the term that white imperialist use to justify their subjugation of "lesser races". The strong dominate the weak basically and therefore anyone conquered and subjugated belongs in that position since they were weak enough to be subjugated and conquered. Natural order as you said. Law of nature.

Surprising comment from you as someone who tends to be so Gung ho on anti imperialism. Sounds like you're more on your nazbol shyt.

 

[⠀X ⠀]

And this is why they’re taking over the world