China just wrecked all of American AI. Silicon Valley is in shambles.
- Thread starter Secure Da Bag
- Start date
blackestofpanthers
God forgives, you are forgiven.
It’s hilarious how you and @bnew are paid ccp accounts and the vast majority of posters haven’t caught on yet
Some of the takes in here 
also can search the web.
Found 50 results
Thought for 10 seconds
In the Spirit of Maya Angelou: A Poetic Reflection on Jay-Z’s Defense
Like a river cutting through stone, Jay-Z’s voice rose—unyielding, unbroken—against the tempest of accusations. His words, sharp as a blues refrain, carried the weight of a man who’d danced with shadows before. “Still I rise,” he might have sung, his lawyer’s pen a sword forged in the fires of Brooklyn grit. Together, they wove a tapestry of defiance, stitching truth into every legal plea, every public decree 214.
I. The Rhythm of Denial
He did not whisper his innocence; he roared it. “This incident didn’t happen,” he declared, his statement a drumbeat echoing through courtrooms and headlines alike. His lawyer, Alex Spiro, marched beside him, dissecting timelines like a surgeon unraveling a lie. “Basic facts—the who, what, when—are wrong,” Spiro charged, his motions sharp as a hawk’s cry, exposing gaps in the accuser’s story: a father’s forgotten rescue, a celebrity’s alibi, a timeline crumbling like ash 45.
II. Towers of Power and the Shadows Beneath
Jay-Z’s team struck not at the accuser but at her architect—Tony Buzbee, the lawyer they branded a “shakedown artist.” In court filings thick as ancient scrolls, they painted him as a puppeteer, threading lawsuits like marionettes for fame and gold. “Extortion!” they cried, suing Buzbee for defamation, unearthing old ghosts—a judge’s tainted past, a car ride cloaked in suspicion 815. The rapper’s counterattack was a storm: “We fight FROM victory, not FOR victory,” he thundered, his words a shield forged in the fires of survival 510.
III. The Judge’s Gavel and the Court of Public Opinion
Even as the judge rebuked his lawyer’s “relentless, combative” motions, Jay-Z stood tall. Analisa Torres, her voice a whip of reason, denied his pleas to unmask the accuser—yet allowed anonymity to linger, a fragile veil 715. But in the court of whispers and screens, Jay-Z’s narrative thrived. PR maestros marveled: his bravado, his invocation of fatherhood and Brooklyn streets, turned the tide. “I’m too big to cancel,” experts mused, their analysis a chorus to his unyielding refrain 14.
IV. The Ballad of Inconsistencies
The accuser’s tale, once a crescendo of trauma, faltered. She confessed to “mistakes”—a father’s hazy memory, a celebrity’s absence. Buzbee clung to her truth, vowing polygraphs and mediation, but Jay-Z’s camp scoffed. “A sham,” Spiro labeled it, his filings a dirge for credibility 510. The law’s cold arithmetic sided with them: statutes of limitations expired, jurisdictions misaligned. Yet the woman persisted, her voice trembling but unbroken, a sparrow in the storm 15.
V. The Legacy of Battle
What remains when the gavel falls? For Jay-Z, a reputation tempered in fire. His lawyers’ tactics—aggressive, unrelenting—may yet carve precedent into legal stone. For the world, a reckoning: How do we weigh fame against truth? Power against justice? In this dance of shadows and spotlights, Jay-Z strides forward, a phoenix in a tailored suit, his story etched in ink and resolve. “True justice is coming,” he vows—a prophecy, a warning, a blues hymn for the ages 214.
And still, like dust, he rises. 13
Thought for 10 seconds
Code:
Okay, the user wants me to explain how Jay-Z and his lawyer responded to recent legal claims, but in the speaking style of Maya Angelou. Hmm, I need to blend legal analysis with Angelou's poetic and powerful voice. Let me start by recalling Maya Angelou's style: she uses bold metaphors, rhythmic sentences, and themes of resilience and justice.
First, I should gather all the relevant info about Jay-Z's legal responses. From the search results, there are multiple webpages detailing his aggressive legal strategy. His lawyer, Alex Spiro, filed motions to dismiss the case based on inconsistencies in the accuser's timeline and legal loopholes like the statute of limitations 415. They also sued the accuser's attorney, Tony Buzbee, for extortion and defamation 2810. The judge criticized Spiro's aggressive tactics but allowed the accuser to remain anonymous for now 715.
Jay-Z's public statements denied the allegations vehemently, attacking Buzbee's credibility rather than the accuser directly 2514. He framed the lawsuit as a shakedown, emphasizing his innocence and confidence in victory 510. PR experts noted his use of bravado and personal narrative in his response 14.
Now, translating these points into Angelou's style. Use metaphors like "storms of accusation" and "towers of power." Highlight resilience with phrases like "still he rises" and "unyielding stone." Contrast the legal battle's technicalities with the emotional weight. Mention the aggressive defense and public relations strategy as both a shield and a sword.
Need to ensure each point is covered poetically: the legal motions, attacking Buzbee, the extortion lawsuit, public statements, and the judge's response. Also, incorporate Angelou's themes of truth and justice prevailing. Make sure to cite sources where specific info comes from, like the timeline inconsistencies 4, the extortion claim 8, and the PR expert's analysis 14.
Avoid listing points dryly; instead, weave them into a narrative with imagery. Check that all key elements from the search results are included and cited properly. Balance the factual info with Angelou's stylistic elements to meet the user's creative request.In the Spirit of Maya Angelou: A Poetic Reflection on Jay-Z’s Defense
Like a river cutting through stone, Jay-Z’s voice rose—unyielding, unbroken—against the tempest of accusations. His words, sharp as a blues refrain, carried the weight of a man who’d danced with shadows before. “Still I rise,” he might have sung, his lawyer’s pen a sword forged in the fires of Brooklyn grit. Together, they wove a tapestry of defiance, stitching truth into every legal plea, every public decree 214.
I. The Rhythm of Denial
He did not whisper his innocence; he roared it. “This incident didn’t happen,” he declared, his statement a drumbeat echoing through courtrooms and headlines alike. His lawyer, Alex Spiro, marched beside him, dissecting timelines like a surgeon unraveling a lie. “Basic facts—the who, what, when—are wrong,” Spiro charged, his motions sharp as a hawk’s cry, exposing gaps in the accuser’s story: a father’s forgotten rescue, a celebrity’s alibi, a timeline crumbling like ash 45.
II. Towers of Power and the Shadows Beneath
Jay-Z’s team struck not at the accuser but at her architect—Tony Buzbee, the lawyer they branded a “shakedown artist.” In court filings thick as ancient scrolls, they painted him as a puppeteer, threading lawsuits like marionettes for fame and gold. “Extortion!” they cried, suing Buzbee for defamation, unearthing old ghosts—a judge’s tainted past, a car ride cloaked in suspicion 815. The rapper’s counterattack was a storm: “We fight FROM victory, not FOR victory,” he thundered, his words a shield forged in the fires of survival 510.
III. The Judge’s Gavel and the Court of Public Opinion
Even as the judge rebuked his lawyer’s “relentless, combative” motions, Jay-Z stood tall. Analisa Torres, her voice a whip of reason, denied his pleas to unmask the accuser—yet allowed anonymity to linger, a fragile veil 715. But in the court of whispers and screens, Jay-Z’s narrative thrived. PR maestros marveled: his bravado, his invocation of fatherhood and Brooklyn streets, turned the tide. “I’m too big to cancel,” experts mused, their analysis a chorus to his unyielding refrain 14.
IV. The Ballad of Inconsistencies
The accuser’s tale, once a crescendo of trauma, faltered. She confessed to “mistakes”—a father’s hazy memory, a celebrity’s absence. Buzbee clung to her truth, vowing polygraphs and mediation, but Jay-Z’s camp scoffed. “A sham,” Spiro labeled it, his filings a dirge for credibility 510. The law’s cold arithmetic sided with them: statutes of limitations expired, jurisdictions misaligned. Yet the woman persisted, her voice trembling but unbroken, a sparrow in the storm 15.
V. The Legacy of Battle
What remains when the gavel falls? For Jay-Z, a reputation tempered in fire. His lawyers’ tactics—aggressive, unrelenting—may yet carve precedent into legal stone. For the world, a reckoning: How do we weigh fame against truth? Power against justice? In this dance of shadows and spotlights, Jay-Z strides forward, a phoenix in a tailored suit, his story etched in ink and resolve. “True justice is coming,” he vows—a prophecy, a warning, a blues hymn for the ages 214.
And still, like dust, he rises. 13
Scustin Bieburr
Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Again, this is something China SAID THEY WOULD DO.
en.m.wikipedia.org
This is the equivalent of someone telegraphing his punch and somehow you still get hit.
It's almost as if when you take public funds and invest them in education, while also regulating the heads of your tech sector so their focus is on innovation instead of share holder value, you end up....innovating.
A ban is simply an admission of defeat if you cant come up with better. The morons in charge now want to just try and trick indians into coming here instead of INVESTING HEAVILY in EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE. Now watch this thread get bushed for China honeypotting as mods conveniently ignore the point. America should be competing and fighting back with BETTER shyt instead of focusing on nonsense like who's allowed into public bathrooms and people having the "wrong" skin color. These people are laughing at us as they spike the football.
The renewable energy industry has the potential to give people billions of dollars in money from the jobs it will produce. Instead now we are doubling down on depleting fossil fuels which are a FINITE resource.
They're investing billions in making education more accessible while we're not offering tuition subsidies, public university or college level courses in high school and cutting funding in public education.
Eventually the economy will tank because one of these tech companies will fail, require a bailout, but because the AI they deployed destroyed millions of middle class jobs there will be no tax base to bail them out. There will be huge bank runs as investors try to cash out their quickly devaluing stock and the banks start collapsing too. My hope is that it happens under a trump presidency so the retards that voted for him finally understand that he is in fact not a genius businessman and he's done to the country what he did to every business he has started.
Thirteenth five-year plan - Wikipedia
This is the equivalent of someone telegraphing his punch and somehow you still get hit.
It's almost as if when you take public funds and invest them in education, while also regulating the heads of your tech sector so their focus is on innovation instead of share holder value, you end up....innovating.
A ban is simply an admission of defeat if you cant come up with better. The morons in charge now want to just try and trick indians into coming here instead of INVESTING HEAVILY in EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE. Now watch this thread get bushed for China honeypotting as mods conveniently ignore the point. America should be competing and fighting back with BETTER shyt instead of focusing on nonsense like who's allowed into public bathrooms and people having the "wrong" skin color. These people are laughing at us as they spike the football.
The renewable energy industry has the potential to give people billions of dollars in money from the jobs it will produce. Instead now we are doubling down on depleting fossil fuels which are a FINITE resource.
They're investing billions in making education more accessible while we're not offering tuition subsidies, public university or college level courses in high school and cutting funding in public education.
Eventually the economy will tank because one of these tech companies will fail, require a bailout, but because the AI they deployed destroyed millions of middle class jobs there will be no tax base to bail them out. There will be huge bank runs as investors try to cash out their quickly devaluing stock and the banks start collapsing too. My hope is that it happens under a trump presidency so the retards that voted for him finally understand that he is in fact not a genius businessman and he's done to the country what he did to every business he has started.
Last edited:
Eternal Tecate
Superstar
The question of how long it would take for the United States to achieve communism is highly speculative and depends on a wide range of factors, including political, economic, social, and cultural changes. Given the current structure of the U.S., which is deeply rooted in capitalism and individualism, a transition to communism would require a radical and unprecedented shift. Here are some considerations:
1. Historical Context
- Historically, transitions to communism have occurred through revolutions or radical overhauls of existing systems (e.g., Russia in 1917, China in 1949). These transitions were often driven by extreme social inequality, economic collapse, or political upheaval.
- In the U.S., such conditions do not currently exist, and the political system is designed to resist radical changes.
2. Cultural and Ideological Barriers
- The U.S. has a strong cultural emphasis on individualism, private property, and free markets. These values are deeply ingrained and would make a shift to communism extremely challenging.
- Public opinion would need to shift dramatically, which could take generations, if it happens at all.
3. Political and Economic Systems
- The U.S. political system is designed to balance power and prevent radical changes. Even significant reforms, such as universal healthcare or increased social welfare, face intense opposition.
- A transition to communism would require dismantling the existing capitalist system, which would face fierce resistance from corporations, political elites, and much of the population.
4. Potential Pathways
- Gradual Reform: If the U.S. were to move toward communism, it would likely be through a gradual process of implementing socialist policies (e.g., universal healthcare, free education, wealth redistribution) over decades or even centuries. This would still face significant opposition and might not lead to full communism.
- Revolutionary Change: A rapid transition to communism would require a complete breakdown of the current system, which is highly unlikely without a catastrophic event (e.g., economic collapse, war, or environmental disaster).
5. Timeframe
- If we assume a gradual shift toward more socialist policies, it could take 50 to 100 years or more for the U.S. to adopt some elements of socialism, but full communism would likely take much longer, if it ever happens.
- A revolutionary transition could theoretically happen much faster (e.g., within a decade), but this would require extreme conditions and is highly improbable in the current context.
6. Global Context
- The global economic system is deeply interconnected, and a shift to communism in the U.S. would likely face opposition from other capitalist nations. This could further complicate or delay any transition.
Conclusion
In the absence of a catastrophic event or a dramatic shift in public opinion, it is unlikely that the U.S. will achieve communism in the foreseeable future. If such a transition were to occur, it would likely take many decades to centuries, and even then, it is far from certain. The U.S. is more likely to see incremental changes toward social democracy or welfare capitalism rather than a full transition to communism.
Again, this is something China SAID THEY WOULD DO.
Thirteenth five-year plan - Wikipedia
It's almost as if when you take public funds and invest them in education, while also regulating the heads of their tech sector so their focus is on innovation instead of share holder value, you end up....innovating.
A ban is simply an admission of defeat if you cant come up with better. The morons in charge now want to just try and trick indians into coming here instead of INVESTING HEAVILY in EDUCATION AND HEALTHCARE. Now watch this thread get bushed for China honeypotting as mods conveniently ignore the point. America should be competing and fighting back with BETTER shyt instead of focusing on nonsense like who's allowed into public bathrooms and people having the "wrong" skin color. These people are laughing at us as they spike the football.
The renewable energy industry has the potential to give people billions of dollars in money from the jobs it will produce. Instead now we are doubling down on depleting fossil fuels which are a FINITE resource.
They're investing billions in making education more accessible while we're not offering tuition subsidies, public university or college level courses in high school and cutting funding in public education.
Eventually the economy will tank because one of these tech companies will fail, require a bailout, but because the AI they deployed destroyed millions of middle class jobs there will be no tax base to bail them out. There will be huge bank runs as investors try to cash out their quickly devaluing stock and the banks start collapsing too. My hope is that it happens under a trump presidency so the retards that voted for him finally understand that he is in fact not a genius businessman and he's done to the country what he did to every business he has started.
They probably don't even have to invest billions in it because it could be easy work for them to program these models.
Meanwhile companies here just give us a dab will do you and claim they're still developing the technology
The only one with chinky eyes here is you bytch, and that’s cause your daddy has bad aim
Scustin Bieburr
Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Because it's open source, you'll have millions of laid off programmers that our idiot tech CEOs fired having the time to mess around with it. So much of the labor of actually improving the models can be done by the users themselves.
So we will probably get a lot of new programs being built by the programmers these idiots tried to replace with AI and H1Bs.
Mike Nasty
Superstar
Another odd lost in translation Chinese insult. Just fry the rice and STFU,The only one with chinky eyes here is you bytch, and that’s cause your daddy has bad aim
nikkas will say this from a phone or pc that was made in China. While wearing clothes that came from China, while sitting on some shyt that was also made in China, while eating you guessed it. Chinese food.
Mike Nasty
Superstar
Now here come the 'haven't posted in 10 year' Chinese atl accts. We get it already "China Numba Won".
