Casey Affleck is not getting the Nate Parker treatment. Not surprised but read up

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,448
Reputation
7,115
Daps
110,134
The alleged victim wasn't black and they didn't "care" until one of the more popular black shea butter thots found out he wasn't "dating in"...then they pried, then that bullshyt came out. He was acquitted because he didn't rape anybody. Ignore list for suckas.
He was acquitted because he was in a relationship with her.
You're smart enough to read, I've read your posts about your past and whatnot, don't be intellectually disingenuous.
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,555
Daps
90,284
Reppin
NO
I didn't know Casey Afleck was creating a Black historical movie based on real events and important figures an inserting rape scenes that didn't exist into the movie :ohhh:

Doesn't matter what type of movie Nate Parker created, the FACT of the matter is that black feminists attacked a INNOCENT black man who was accused by a white woman, but don't say shyt about all white male thugs in Hollyweird who beat and rap their women, but since he is black now, black feminist are now obsessed with rape culture and all that faux-intellectual bullshyt.

He created a movie to empower black people, and yall moist, man-hating feminists butch bulldykes and fakkits did the white man's bidding by destroying it any way possible. This in turn makes it a lot harder for black filmmakers to produce anything that is undeniably pro-black. Bu bu bu that drunk white chick. FOH.
 
Last edited:

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,448
Reputation
7,115
Daps
110,134
He got acquitted. She was white.
Not their problem until white women told them.
Not their problem until that particular bougie black hipsterette found out he dated white, like she had a chance.
Lol at the immature motivation behind most of these idiotic "draggings". Lol at nikkas using faq slang, too.
Their men, their problem.
He's a weak-willed c00n for dating a cac woman too. :yeshrug:
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,448
Reputation
7,115
Daps
110,134
Doesn't matter what type of movie Nate Parker created, the FACT of the matter is that black feminists attacked a INNOCENT black man who was accused by a white woman, but don't say shyt about all white male thugs in Hollyweird who beat and rap their women, but since he is black now, black feminist are not obsessed with rape culture and all that faux-intellectual bullshyt.

He created a movie to empower black people, and yall moist, man-hating feminists butch bulldykes and fakkits did the white man's bidding by destroying it any way possible. This in turn makes it a lot harder for black filmmakers to produce anything that is undeniably pro-black. Bu bu bu that drunk white chick. FOH.
It came out because of the movie, you're attempting to discount it because it doesn't fit in with your argument.
He created a fake rape scene. That in itself is already subject to public panning. Not that hard to write an accurate script.
His stupidity in the sexual assault case was just icing on a misogynistic cake.
Black filmmakers continue to produce fantastic movies that are pro-Black. They just don't have rape charges following them like a shadow, or White spouses clouding their vision.
I think there's a great Gil Scott Heron poem called "Brother" or something like that you need to read.
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,555
Daps
90,284
Reppin
NO
My allegiance lies with intelligent black men and women who make the best choices for themselves and their people.

If your allegiance is for black men then you should be woman enough to marry and procreate with one to further the race you claim you are for so much. No pro-black scholar alive will cosign same-sex couples.
 
Joined
May 30, 2014
Messages
27,277
Reputation
9,725
Daps
103,631
Reppin
Midwest/East Coast/Tx (Now in Canada)
The court acquitted a black man of the rape of a white woman... At a white school.
He was not rich.
She lied. She paid the price in guilt and bodied herself like a coward.
All y'all can do is cry rape.
Black men don't have "male privilege"...being male makes us threatening to the cac male. These particular women are nothing more than an annoyance to the cac male. Petulant children who can be calmed down with token displays and increases in access to comfort. It's a game. I wouldn't put my stock in that group. They have their own best interests in mind.
 

AintNoCrampInYaMouthTho

Her: I'm On My Monthly :Wakaokay: Your Mouth Not
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
3,132
Reputation
860
Daps
17,735
:mjlol: Bunch of weird ass c00ns. Some cash do some shyt bit black folks get blamed for it.
 

SubZero

Hall Of Fame
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
3,052
Reputation
665
Daps
9,685
Reppin
Wall Street - Black Renaissance Purveyor
White women are loyal to white supremacy, nothing more to it than that. Since white men exist at the top of the white patriarchal structure (which cannot be separated from white supremacy), they're "loyal" to white men as long as they believe it will benefit them.

Instead of recognizing that their loyalty is fundamentally rooted in racism, you got cats talking about they respect them for it. :mjpls:

Partially because his co-writer was originally convicted of rape (not even wise to include him on the project). Partially because he's married to a white woman so they saw no point in defending him (even if this wasn't said, it was part of the sentiment). That said, three women in my immediate family saw the movie, saw more facebook posts from black women defending him, and most black women I know offline knew nothing about the case (or the movie), so making it out to be a black woman hit job is overblown.

As for white women and people in general, as I said they support each other as a matter of maintaining supremacy. If Trump were to push for a return to slavery tomorrow, the majority of white people would fall in line in this country (see: Nazi Europe).

Aww, now he's name calling and getting emotional. Didn't meant to hurt your feelings with reason, bruv:hubie: I'll leave you to your nonsensical black women bashing :salute:.

But getting his friend involved shouldn't be a problem since his friend was also acquitted by the court of law. What happened to respecting the rule of law as law abiding citizens and giving people second chances since they aren't repeat offenders, especially with what's at stake? I believe he got his friend involved because he was probably the only one who believed in the project when he started it.

Also, whoever he married shouldn't be a problem since most black women covertly and overtly swirl these days and most of you fantasize about white men, apart from the ones getting dikked down by them. So why do you have a problem with who he married? People need to learn how to separate personal interests from group interests. He married the woman because she complements him but that hasn't stopped from being pro-black and the Nat Turner project is a testament to that because a lot have tried and failed. The fact that he sacrificed everything to make sure it became a reality shows a man dedicated to the black cause.

Yes, obviously, white women understand the game and see the bigger picture. They know they have to support their men in white male patriarchy and white supremacy - to maintain their status. But black women want to do the impossible by climbing over black men to be on the same status white women. It just shows you how much of critical thinkers white women are and how shallow black women are. For black women to attain the position they covet and be on the same social status as white women - they need black men. Men uplift the status of women - not the other way around. You have to always put the horse before the cart and let the horse take the lead.

I started looking at black women differently after the Nate Parker incident because loyalty is the most attractive quality in a woman. A disloyal woman is very dangerous and can't be trusted. :ehh:
 

William F. Russell

11x Champion; 5x MVP; 1st Black Coach
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
20,063
Reputation
6,805
Daps
50,323
:patrice: okay so where's the proof?

i know emotions are high in here, but there is PROOF that nate parker did his shyt

this is just a one sided accusation :francis:

:dahelldidyousay: Nate and his boy didn't do anything but run a train on a white girl who consented to it. Hence his acquittal. You cannot be serious.
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,555
Daps
90,284
Reppin
NO
It came out because of the movie, you're attempting to discount it because it doesn't fit in with your argument.
He created a fake rape scene. That in itself is already subject to public panning. Not that hard to write an accurate script.
His stupidity in the sexual assault case was just icing on a misogynistic cake.
Black filmmakers continue to produce fantastic movies that are pro-Black. They just don't have rape charges following them like a shadow, or White spouses clouding their vision.
I think there's a great Gil Scott Heron poem called "Brother" or something like that you need to read.
The rape scenes had NOTHING to do with movie being attacked by black twitter warriors and the black men hating feminists.

IT WAS ATTACKED BECAUSE WHITE DADDY GAVE THOSE UGLY FAT LESBIANS A JOB AND A LITTLE RECOGNITION AT THEIR COMPANY TO WRITE A HIT-PIECE ON AN UNAPOLOGETIC PRO-BLACK FILM.

IT couldve had NO rape scenes in the film, and yall simps will still find a way to nitpick at this masterpiece and find someway to destroy this film.

IT was a conjoined effort by both white society, and ignorant black feminists to slander this film anyway possible, thus when black producers have a problem funding for a Marcus Garvey or Touissant film in the future, you can pat yourself on the head for it's failure. :scust:
 
Top