Them thots with a septum piercing, infinity symbol tats and liberal arts master degrees ain't saying shyt now 
Casey Affleck is not getting the Nate Parker treatment. Not surprised but read up
- Thread starter El Poyo Loco
- Start date
Vashti
In need of assistance.
Yeah but there's a reason why I put that phrase in quotes...I don't feel that way personally but I understand why some black women do/would.
Im in talks with a black king now. We'll see how it goes.
Vashti
In need of assistance.
All alleged pervs. Where is the deflecting?
So how do you feel personally?
In my opinion anyone who wishes to be a slave hates themselves. I don't think there's really any middle ground.
Vashti
In need of assistance.
What was the other question?
Why would they be. He's their white daddy,Them thots with a septum piercing, infinity symbol tats and liberal arts master degrees ain't saying shyt now
It was asking do you not see white supremacy's vested interest in removing the black man from the black family.
Don't pretend that you don't know the difference between just not supporting something and doing the bidding of white supremacists by starting a smear campaign
I have no love, excuses, or rationalizations for sexual harassment of any kid....I am really passionate on the issue, it's never ok, and it's never acceptable. If he's guilty of that, which I suspect many in Hollywood, and in all forms of employment, throughout the nation are, then it's disgusting, shameful behavior, and should never be tolerated. The fact is though, as a society we are still very repressive of women, and very prone to the kind of sexist rationales that allow this kind of thinking, and actions on men's behavior. The shyt isn't cute, it's not funny, and shouldn't be tolerated. This kind of thing happens at Starbucks across the street from all of us, much less when we are talking about millionaires and Hollywood stars.
From a strictly legal standpoint, the allegations are very different. Regarding public/media outrage, The details of the harassment suit detail alleged actions, Parker's case is pretty clear in his own words, what he was guilty of. Plus, there was a criminal trial, which is a sexier story anyway. He was formally accused in a criminal court. As far as morality, they are very close, both are essentially using your power, whether as a man, or as a celebrity (Affleck) to sexually and verbally violate women. I won't ever defend either, and no one should.
From a strictly legal standpoint, the allegations are very different. Regarding public/media outrage, The details of the harassment suit detail alleged actions, Parker's case is pretty clear in his own words, what he was guilty of. Plus, there was a criminal trial, which is a sexier story anyway. He was formally accused in a criminal court. As far as morality, they are very close, both are essentially using your power, whether as a man, or as a celebrity (Affleck) to sexually and verbally violate women. I won't ever defend either, and no one should.
Why are we so surprised they'd do anything to rip a black man down but any other white man in the same position doing the same thing they quiet as a church mouse.... Hypocritical bytches... 
Ayo @Thomas stop ducking, if ww can go after men that's not theirs, how come bw feminists can't do the same??We are arguing with idiots who are STILL making excuses for black feminists to attack an innocent black men making pro-black films in the name of rape culture, but call themselves "militant" and "pro'black" at the end of the day.
Look at the excuses these idiots make to not even go after white men, like white feminist come after black men. If white women can go after Ray Rice, Bill Cosby, Greg Hardy, OJ, etc when its not "their men", then whats stopping black feminists going after Kurt Busch, Casey Affleck, Sean Penn, Rob Lowe, Bryan Singer, Roman Polaski, etc etc??
Explain @Thomas
What's with you weird ass nikkas, I'm not omnipresent on this site, I do other shyt than just post
I sign out and sign back in to all these weirdos tagging me and acting like I'm about to spend 20 pages arguing with y'all about Nate Parker and some cac molester.
I don't care what White women do, it is not a Black woman's job to police White men.
What's with you weird ass nikkas, I'm not omnipresent on this site, I do other shyt than just post
I sign out and sign back in to all these weirdos tagging me and acting like I'm about to spend 20 pages arguing with y'all about Nate Parker and some cac molester.
I don't care what White women do, it is not a Black woman's job to police White men.
But it's black women's job to defame the reputation of black men acquitted by the court of law?
The fact that you still maintain that Parker is guilty of rape is absolutely mind blowing when it has been disproven in court is highly problematic.
And you aspire to be an attorney
So you dont care when cacs attack black men, and by extension YOU? Because when they go after black males, they go after you, nikka, but you dont care about that right?What's with you weird ass nikkas, I'm not omnipresent on this site, I do other shyt than just post
I sign out and sign back in to all these weirdos tagging me and acting like I'm about to spend 20 pages arguing with y'all about Nate Parker and some cac molester.
I don't care what White women do, it is not a Black woman's job to police White men.
How is bw feminists "policing" black males on twitter and other social media?
SO it's the ww's job to police black males right? Never white males right?
For the last fukking time, Nate Parker didn't coerce or force any woman to have sex with him. He didn't assault or rape anybody. He wasn't guilty of anything. Why is it that you batshyt crazy feminists and manginas CANNOT understand this?
