yeah it's about that time lol
Cartels are in an all out war w/police and military in Culiacan, Mexico
- Thread starter Booker T Garvey
- Start date
yeah I live in Canada and I have to educate you... sad. you can have the last word, happy friday
Okay... so .. I get all that. I mean no disrespect but I dont get your point.nikka this ain’t 1965. It’s a different game out here. The US ain’t having NO foreign militaries doing shyt in the states but yet they have a presence COUNTLESS countries doing all types of fukkery. Whatever negatives come from allowing the cartels to do their thing is minor compared to the positives for the greedy US. The moment that that changes they’ll smack fire out Sinaloa
If a war is being fought on your soil you LOST already
My point still stands. Not really here to argue a fact. If they cant win a war across that water, they not winning in Mexico
The USA fukked up Saddam's Iraq(twice).... I know USA is a White supremacist empire. But I don't get this talk about "USA never winning a war since Vietnam." I even had to correct a professor of mines. Then there's Libya. Either way USA no longer likes to get its hands dirty these days. They let "pawns" do the dirty work. USA AINT invading Venezuela. They rather let Colombia or Brazil do the dirty work. Only country I see them directly invading today is Iran. Point is never underestimate your enemy.
And if you and others want to use Afghanistan then sure but Afghanistan is basically a colony to surround Iran. And they already got Osama.
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
Clearly you don’t get it that’s ok. You don’t think that the US could win a war against Mexico ok brehOkay... so .. I get all that. I mean no disrespect but I dont get your point.
My point still stands. Not really here to argue a fact. If they cant win a war across that water, they not winning in Mexico
USA would skull fukk the cartels right outta the western hemisphere. Do people forget what the USA did to the Colombian cartels. And that was just DEA.The US would smack the ever loving fire out of the cartels
Mexico could too. They’re compromised in some way. They could mustard gas the cartels to Bolivia and back if they wanted to get super foul and super gangster. I don’t care how rich the cartels are. They don’t have mass quantities of military grade weapons or weapons of mass destruction so if they’re standing toe to toe with the Mexican military it’s because the Mexican military doesn’t actually want them gone
The entire USA military? Special forces? And whats worse... Unlike Vietnam or Afghanistan the terrain will not be to the benefit of the cartel like it was for the Viet Cong or Taliban. All they will be able to do is urban insurgency like seen in Iraq but the cartels are NOT as zealous or real warriors like those insurgents in Iraq after the fall of Saddam. Not tryna cheat beat a White supremacist empire(fukk the USA for what they have been doing to Haiti and ADOS) but Seal Team 6 would have a field day with the cartels. The new president is a softie which is why the cartels can do all this. Don't get me wrong the cartel has heavy artillery like anti-tank and air missiles. But do they have drones? And A LOT of them?
What they mean is if the USA was RUTHLESS(ruthless in not caring about their image) like say China, Russia, Saudi Arabia or even ISRAEL. And the USA has committed TONS of war crumes and bombed MANY residential areas.Commit war crimes and gas your own people is your answer?
Heck the USA are allowing the corrupt puppet govt in Haiti to massacre my people. They have bombed civilian areas in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Libya, etc many times and there have been many complaints. Hell we can even go look into Vietnam. The USA is not afraid to kill innocent Black/Brown people overseas. Like others said it doesn't benefit them to kill off the cartels($$$) but more importantly an empire like the USA has an IMAGE to keep. We're the "good guys" and so we can't be reckless like say Turkey who are about to exterminate the Kurds with zero fukks given. This is the same USA that did THIS!Haditha massacre - Wikipedia
USA would only need to use ground troops with limited air support.
Does Mexico even have S-500s?
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
US finna send in forest rangers on horseback to handle thatUSA would only need to use ground troops with limited air support.
I can't stand it when people use this "USA hasn't won a war since Vietnam" garbage. Warfare has evolved so much. Now... I don't know about horseback rangers.... lol. But literally a ground invasion from city to city would be enough especially considering how close the USA is to Mexico and the less hostile terrain of Mexico. USA has 15x more tanks thank Mexico.US finna send in forest rangers on horseback to handle that
Cave Savage
Feminist
My point is that getting rid of the illicit drug trade wouldn't stop the cartels. If MS-13 can have a grip on their countries without much money, imagine the cartels with all their resources.
Cave Savage
Feminist
USA would skull fukk the cartels right outta the western hemisphere. Do people forget what the USA did to the Colombian cartels. And that was just DEA.
The new president is a softie which is why the cartels can do all this. Don't get me wrong the cartel has heavy artillery like anti-tank and air missiles. But do they have drones? And A LOT of them?
If we're just talking about the cartels, even the Mexican army themselves could obliterate the cartels. But the current administration doesn't support that and the "human rights concerns" would come up.
I didnt say against Mexico specifically but eh, we entitled to our own opinions
You call what Bush did to Iraq a win?
All that money spent fighting against folks who didnt even do you anything aint what I call a win. Meanwhile they aint want smoke with who really did it.
Seriously any country(unless you're a failed state with hardly any central govt) can obliterate their drug syndicates.
Fade Runner 2049
Veteran
That was
