Candice "im not black" Owens

Hey_zeus

Veteran
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
52,675
Reputation
5,051
Daps
161,774
Reppin
Chicago
So she's just like other mainstream first gen AAs that are used to exploit AAs at large. The Mona Scott, Q from WSHH, Shade Room, etc? Got it...
 

lurker emeritus

low quantity poster
Joined
Apr 25, 2018
Messages
1,436
Reputation
613
Daps
7,905
Reppin
stl (north side)
it's been an interesting few days here culminating with election day
tenor.gif
 

Somebody

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,487
Reputation
290
Daps
8,859
Sure they are.

Just not AADOS. They have to right to claim that label if they choose -- but they would be AADOS in the U.S. -- that is for AADOS. It's not that deep.

They were enslaved in the Virgin Islands. The DOS claim goes to the country your ancestors were enslaved in. So that would be they would be DOS in the Virgin Islands.

And if they evert wanted to could go after reparations :

Danish West Indies (1666-1917)[edit]
Main articles: Danish West Indies and Danish West India Company
Denmark-Norway acquired the island of St. Thomas in 1671[1] and St. Jan (now St. John) in 1718, and bought St. Croix from France in 1733. All of the islands' economies were based primarily on sugar. These islands were known as the Danish West Indies and were eventually sold to the United States in 1917 for 25 million dollars.[1] Several Danish-American succession talks had been made since 1870 due to a rising number of riots and unrest from the poorer English speaking population. The Zahle Government (1914-1920) held a heavily boycotted election for Danish mainland constituencies, which produced a minority for the sale of the islands. The United States hoped to use them as naval bases. Since 1917, the islands have been known as the U.S. Virgin Islands.​


in 1492, muslims and jewish ppl were expelled from spain. many of the jewish ppl went to the netherlands. there, the wic was founded. it had jurisdiction over the caribbean, brazil, AND north america.

the company was a company not a country. this aados is nonsense. america is broke. the ppl who print the money are not. they are the same ppl who enslaved us and are the same ppl who own the CORPORATIONS that date back to slavery and the families even further back. notice how we have never had a jewish president.


when jewish ppl got fried, it wasn’t a money grab. slavery was. the family’s who owned your labor aren’t even in the government, unless u count bernie fukkin sanders :ld:

it’s so many ways they can dodge repirations since this whole narrative doesn’t take into account very strongly the relationship between the government, lobbyists, and corporations.


this aados shyt is lazy. “african american” is way too new an idea to even describe slaves and their relationship with their owners. this isn’t about new countries. thats time sensitive. it’s about blood and a real identity.

for example, if a jamaican family in 1810 escaped slavery by fleeing to a save haven in new jersey, which had since abolished slavery, are they considered aados? slavery in the united states wasn’t abolished until 1865. that’s 55 years. does every dos in jersey deserve what ppl should be getting in florida, a place with many carribean roots, or georgia where slavery wasn’t even close to finish?

or does it make sense to just go after the families who used slavery to create the corporations that run the world today?

you’ll have to do a little more research than who was shipped to which political confinement, since its money you’re after. deal with the ones who actually made the money

when ppl assume we’re moving forward and only forward as a society, i like to ask them this question; when did slaves have a better sense of identity, today or when they first landed in the new world?:usure:
 

TRFG

Not who you think
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
13,798
Reputation
300
Daps
38,508
This is evidence that Tariq is an idiot :mjlol:


Just like Trump he doesnt know the USVI is America, fukking idiot :pachaha:
 
Top