Candice "im not black" Owens

[R=G]

Lol.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

a lot of caping for candace in the thread

In what way? She's not AADOS. Her profile is accurate. She's not lying on her profile to be "closer" to AADOS. All the facts are on her side.

The premise and the conclusion don't lead or connect to each other at all.

 

[???]

In what way? She's not AADOS. Her profile is accurate. She's not lying on her profile to be "closer" to AADOS. All the facts are on her side.The premise and the conclusion don't lead or connect to each other at all.

but she is always talking shyt about black americans on the conservative side of the game, can she talk negative shyt about her caribbean island in public and not get stomped, i don't know about that.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

but she is always talking shyt about black americans on the conservative side of the game, can she talk negative shyt about her caribbean island in public and not get stomped, i don't know about that.

I can't disagree with that.

 

[Brer Dog]

 

[omnifax]

I don't even like Tariq - but what he is saying is that she is not Black American- meaning her ancestors were not enslaved in the States - North or South.

The Virgin Islands abolished slavery in 1848.

The Danish presence in the Caribbean began in the mid-17th century, and in 1754 the islands of St. Croix, St. Thomas, and St. John became Danish colonies known as the Danish West Indies. Sugar was an important industry into the 19th century, and slaves were imported to provide labor for the islands’ plantations. Slavery ended in 1848, and the islands were purchased by the United States in 1916 to become the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917.​

The July 1848 slave rebellion on St. Croix, where some 5,000 blacks were free while another 17,000 remained enslaved, motivated Governor Peter von Scholten to abolished slavery.

The U.S. didn't purchase the Islands until 1916 -- and officially became the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917.

That was 17 years before U.S. Emancipation of 4 Million Enslaved -- and U.S. didn't purchase the Virgin Islands until 52 years after Emancipation in the U.S.

So, he is saying she is not AADOS - due to her ancestors not being enslaved on U.S. soil -- as the Virgin Islands was not purchased by the U.S. until 1916.

To support the point being made here Antonio Moore said that Candace doesn't have any political experience because she just became political in the last year or so. Her appeal to DACS to "get off the Democratic plantation" only had merit in the assumption that she is a DACS as well which meant she had a mutual history in black politics here in the US. Now that it is revealed that she isn't a DACS it would appear she has no connection to even suggest whether blacks should leave or stay in the Democratic party or any political party for that matter.

 

[CHICAGO]

HE MISSED ON THIS ONE.

THERES NO NEED TO HOP ON EVERY LITTLE THING.

WE ALREADY KNOW SHES A BOOT LICKING c00n.





​

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Real talk. That speech was 5/10. She loses 3 points by trying to imply that Republicans aren't racists. Another 2 points for claiming that Uncle Tom and similar terms were created by leftists.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Her appeal to DACS

DACS?

 

[Kilgore Trout]

Does Tariq not know that the Virgin Islands is US territory? Therefore, the Owens family would in fact be American. There's a British Virgin Islands as well. But either way, this is still not a problem.

I don't get the angle here.

In what way? She's not AADOS. Her profile is accurate. She's not lying on her profile to be "closer" to AADOS. All the facts are on her side.

The premise and the conclusion don't lead or connect to each other at all.

She pretends to be AADOS when she spews her c00nish rhetoric. Are you really that dense ?

 

[Biscayne]

The problem lies in the fact that she's seen as a voice for AA ppl. Her bootstrap See, my family was able to do it, why can't you mindset is being used to brow beat AA's, when she is not in fact AA and her ancestors aren't owed the same recompense that AA's are owed(thats not to say that American meddling had no effect on the surrounding islands especially the Virgin Islands) but meddling is different than actually owning someone's ancestry for hundreds of years.

 

[Hardest Since MC Ren]

I don't even like Tariq - but what he is saying is that she is not Black American- meaning her ancestors were not enslaved in the States - North or South.

The Virgin Islands abolished slavery in 1848.

The Danish presence in the Caribbean began in the mid-17th century, and in 1754 the islands of St. Croix, St. Thomas, and St. John became Danish colonies known as the Danish West Indies. Sugar was an important industry into the 19th century, and slaves were imported to provide labor for the islands’ plantations. Slavery ended in 1848, and the islands were purchased by the United States in 1916 to become the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917.​

The July 1848 slave rebellion on St. Croix, where some 5,000 blacks were free while another 17,000 remained enslaved, motivated Governor Peter von Scholten to abolished slavery.

The U.S. didn't purchase the Islands until 1916 -- and officially became the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917.

That was 17 years before U.S. Emancipation of 4 Million Enslaved -- and U.S. didn't purchase the Virgin Islands until 52 years after Emancipation in the U.S.

So, he is saying she is not AADOS - due to her ancestors not being enslaved on U.S. soil -- as the Virgin Islands was not purchased by the U.S. until 1916.

Oh please stop
That's not what he's saying at all
Residents of VI are US citizens..moving from VI to US is similar to a Puerto Rican moving here

Also I heard someone mention Tariq's Jamaican roots
How the fukk is he AADOS?

 

[Secure Da Bag]

She pretends to be AADOS when she spews her c00nish rhetoric. Are you really that dense ?

Not as dense as you. You just found out she was doing that. Plus, that wasn't what the OP was about in the first place.

Learn to read.

 

[Biscayne]

In what way? She's not AADOS. Her profile is accurate. She's not lying on her profile to be "closer" to AADOS. All the facts are on her side.

The premise and the conclusion don't lead or connect to each other at all.

She's not lying on her profile. Correct. But the fact that she's being used as a Conservative AA Trojan horse in the first place when she isn't even AA is problematic. I always thought she was AA until this thread. That's a problem...

Maybe I'm just lazy at research...

 

[TEH]

I see Tariq is throwing non American blacks under the bus after he’s finished with Haiti