🚨 Cali Gov Gavin Newsom SPLITS with DEMOCRATS on trans issues & says they wrong WRONG for allowing trans athletes in female sports!

[CoryMack]

I remember watching a boxing match with a trans woman and a woman.

It was literally just watching a man beating up on a girl.

It's okay to agree with Republicans on something. We don't have to take the opposite argument just because.

i don't even look at it as agreeing with republicans. to me, it's just common sense.

 

[Left.A1]

Like Cenk Uygur, Newsom just sat there and took all of Charlie Kirk's bullshyt with a smile and barely pushed back.
Sitting down with MAGA and white supremacists and letting them steamroll you as you agree with every disparaging point about the left and Dems
is not going to win you votes and pull people to your side.
You just look completely bytchmade and fodder for when they need to show how pathetic Dems are right now.

This has long been their strategy….sadly.….their desperation for repunlican acceptance keeps them unprincipled as they seem to have no core anchor to what they stand for as a party

 

[Left.A1]

The they/them ad literally cost them nearly 3 percentage points by itself. It absolutely is the sole reason for the loss.

 

[L@CaT]

Told ya"ll. If Dems are going to win the next election they are going to need a a centrist candidate and Newsome is clearly steering that way.

 

[Left.A1]

Told ya"ll. If Dems are going to win the next election they are going to need a a centrist candidate and Newsome is clearly steering that way.

Like the last “Centrist” that lost

 

[Diunx]

Newson is not the one if they want some of the "independents" and the people that sit out.

Dude is pretty hated.

 

[Left.A1]

“We’re the do nothing democrats, why are you disturbing our presidents speech!!!”


fukking losers lmaooooooooooooooo

 

[Absolut]

Another smoothbrained shill are we?

How Trump Won, and How Harris Lost

He made one essential bet: that his grievances would become the grievances of the MAGA movement, and then the G.O.P., and then more than half the country. It paid off.

www.nytimes.com

“The Charlamagne ad ranked as one of the Trump team’s most effective 30-second spots, according to an analysis by Future Forward, Ms. Harris’s leading super PAC. It shifted the race 2.7 percentage points in Mr. Trump’s favor after viewers watched it.”

It ran repeatedly in swing states. Was perhaps the most materially impactful political ad in our voting lifetimes

 

[NSSVO]

Newson is not the one if they want some of the "independents" and the people that sit out.

Dude is pretty hated.

Hated by people who would hate anyone who runs California

 

[CoryMack]

Whilst I agree with your point, and it is well made and received, the Dems are in a load of fukking trouble. They need to find a better message, and a better way to deliver it because it failed, and badly, only a few months ago

The Democrats don’t need a new or better message. They simply need to cut out the weird shyt and go back to being the party of the working class, which comprises most of the country. And then act with a sense of purpose once they get into office.

Trump made them look horrible on the border issue. The democrats wanted to have debates and come up with “bi-partisan” legislation, while Trump simply declared a state of emergency, signed an executive order, and placed the Marines on the southern border. And did it all within a matter of days.

After seeing what Trump and Musk have done, there will never be another acceptable excuse for p*ssyfooting around once you’re in power.

As for the gays/trannies etc., there are laws on the books to protect them already. No need for new legislation or special attention, just enforce the laws already on the books.

 

[Absolut]

The Democrats don’t need a new or better message. They simply need to cut out the weird shyt and go back to being the party of the working class, which comprises most of the country. And then act with a sense of purpose once they get into office.

Trump made them look horrible on the border issue. The democrats wanted to have debates and come up with “bi-partisan” legislation, while Trump simply declared a state of emergency, signed an executive order, and placed the Marines on the southern border. And did it all within a matter of days.

After seeing what Trump and Musk have done, there will never be another acceptable excuse for p*ssyfooting around once you’re in power.

As for the gays/trannies etc., there are laws on the books to protect them already. No need for new legislation or special attention, just enforce the laws already on the books.

Exactly. After acting like the border was a non issue, then when they couldn’t fake the funk any longer tried to pass some dumb bill that was voted down and threw up their hands and said welp nothing more we can do. Doesn’t take a law go down and secure the fukking border

 

[Left.A1]

Another smoothbrained shill are we?

How Trump Won, and How Harris Lost

He made one essential bet: that his grievances would become the grievances of the MAGA movement, and then the G.O.P., and then more than half the country. It paid off.

www.nytimes.com

“The Charlamagne ad ranked as one of the Trump team’s most effective 30-second spots, according to an analysis by Future Forward, Ms. Harris’s leading super PAC. It shifted the race 2.7 percentage points in Mr. Trump’s favor after viewers watched it.”

It ran repeatedly in swing states. Was perhaps the most materially impactful political ad in our voting lifetimes

Anti-trans ads erode support for transgender people in America with no effect on presidential election: study

While Trump and Republicans aren’t winning over voters with transphobic ads, they are succeeding at making Americans skeptical of trans rights.

www.yahoo.com

Despite significant spending by former President Donald Trump’s campaign and Republicans on anti-transgender ads, new research released Thursday by Ground Media shows that the ads are failing to influence voter preferences.

Key findings from the poll back up the long-supported claims that anti-transgender rhetoric is not what wins elections:

• The use of political attack ads against transgender people was described as “sad and shameful” by the majority of Democrats (61%) and Independents (58%), and even by a plurality of Republicans (41%). The majority of voters also said that they feel that these ads are “mean-spirited” and “out of hand”
• 85% of Republicans said candidates should back away from transgender messaging, more than the share of Democratic (75%) and independent (82%) voters who said the same
• By a more than 20 point margin (52% to 31%), voters would back a candidate who supports transgender rights versus a candidate who opposes transgender rights; by similar margins (52% to 29%), voters trust the Democratic Party over the Republican Party to handle transgender issues

In addition, a study from Ground Media found that a recent Trump anti-trans advertisement yielded “no statistically significant shift” in voter choice, mobilization or likelihood to vote.

ICYMI: New Survey Finds Anti-Trans Ads Ineffective, Disliked by Voters

Data for Progress finds that among likely voters, Democrats, Independents and Republicans alike don’t want to see “mean-spirited” ads targeting the…

www.hrc.org

“The most impactful political ad of our lifetime”


Another braindead complete fukking idiot quoting a losers campaign pac making excuses for another EMBARRASING loss where they wasted nearly 1 billion dollars in funding

 

[Absolut]

Anti-trans ads erode support for transgender people in America with no effect on presidential election: study

While Trump and Republicans aren’t winning over voters with transphobic ads, they are succeeding at making Americans skeptical of trans rights.

www.yahoo.com

ICYMI: New Survey Finds Anti-Trans Ads Ineffective, Disliked by Voters

Data for Progress finds that among likely voters, Democrats, Independents and Republicans alike don’t want to see “mean-spirited” ads targeting the…

www.hrc.org

“The most impactful political ad of our lifetime”


Another braindead complete fukking idiot quoting a losers campaign pac making excuses for another EMBARRASING loss

Yea the article from weeks before the election definitely paints the whole picture, as opposed to the analysis after the election swing state beat down that discussed why it was a beat down in the swing states. You wear dresses at night or something? Why the defense on this issue?

 

[Left.A1]

Yea the article from weeks before the election definitely paints the whole picture, as opposed to the analysis after the election swing state beat down that discussed why it was a beat down in the swing states.

“Weeks before the election” as in when these ads were being ran and people were seeing them?

Your stereotypical low intellect ass is arguing that it took weeks AFTER watching the “The most impactful political ad of our lifetime” to change their views from when the study was done

Just complete brain rot babble This is the intellectually embarrassing shyt I'm talking about…dumb nikka thought he had one…LMAO

You wear dresses at night or something? Why the defense on this issue?

You like being trumps bytch or something? Why the defense on these constantly losing conservative statagies from the “do nothing democrats” .… didn't you learn anything from getting on your knees and opening your mouth for Liz Cheney the first time or are you just too fukking dumb and like losing the same way the rest of that party does?

 

[MrRDU]

I agree but damn, Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk hates nikkas & unrepentant about it and but you shills dont care