ad hominem -
"Translation: clearly you were able to show me where my understanding of racism was flawed so now i'm going to attempt to say you use books n shyt."
so you're debating on what then? What racism means to you? That's all find and dandy but when conversing with other people you typically start with defined terms so you're not arguing different subjects. I'm arguing racism. You're arguing YOUR ill conceived version of racism.
no this isn't going anywhere because you've refused to acknowledge the fact that the term CAC is a racist term by definition, as is nigg'er. While they both have varying histories they are in fact both terms often used in a racist manner, particularly in the coli.
yes you have and i've acknowledged the difference and agreed with you 100% on the differences. and i've clearly shown you where there were similarities. I play basketball. Jordan plays basketball. We have things in common. Cac is a racis word, nikka is a racist word. They have things in common. You and you're ilk are the only one's who've assigned some arbitrary degree to this debate. No one ever said Cac was as viscous or taboo a word as Nigg'er, simply that they both shared a commonality in that they were both racist terms.
yes you're right i've continued to rely on DEFINITIONS to define things WTF was i thinking...
Cans gonna can