CAC

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,958
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,030
whitey this and ching-chow that
is not how the intelligent man acts
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,125
Reputation
2,604
Daps
67,686
God I wanted to go to Electric Zoo so bad. Molly and techno :ahh:

279006_196059957109383_164008423647870_471059_3328831_o.jpg


I wanna go to electric forest too. shyt would be trippy as fukk :smugdraper:
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,826
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,258
According to you i made up words in the dictionary...:troll:You're trying to reinvent the word "can" as some kind of racial slur


i'd expect nothing less from a racist. (which you are)According to your logic, you're a racist as well for calling me a "can"


take that to JBO, this isn't a popularity contests. The daps that my posts receive have nothing to do with popularity. I'm not a popular poster. People just agree with the points that I've been making here. You, not so much. It is what it is.

since we're talking shyt i guess it would be prudent of me to point out that this sentence makes no sense and does in fact look like a 3rd grader wrote it.Obviously you can't count either. There was more than one sentence there. Both sentences made perfect sense, the second just had a typo. "nor" instead of "not. I wasn't just talking trash though, I honestly couldn't understand what you were trying to say.


I can't help that you don't see the shyt you do. You started wanting to get personal; attacking my "brownness". I guess that's to be expected as well.Yes, I question your "brown pride" and I explained why. You're waay too overprotective of whites. White people don't even cry about cracker/cac like you're doing here. You're on a website where the "nikka" to "cac" usage is like 100-1, and you're whining. The only form of racism thats insitutionalized is white supremacy, and you're crying about whites being referred to as cacs. Where does brown pride fit in with someone who thinks that a white person being called a cac is the same as a Hispanic being called a spic?

Yes. If we use your fuked up definition of racism, rather than the ACTUAL definition we find in dictionaries. My definition of racism is no different than the dictionary's definition of racism.

A term used to insult someone based solely on race is RACISM you ignorant b*stard. This isn't magic, it isn't some obscure understanding of the subject, this is what racism is. Learn it.How does the word cracker insult white people? I can tell you how spic insults Hispanics. I can tell you how ****** insults black people. You can't tell me how the word cracker itself insults white people.

and yet you said...

Bottom line is you've said time and again that the difference between N/gger and C/A/C is that one was historically used to fuk with a group of people while the other wasn't. HISTORY, per your argument, was the justification for CAC not being a racist term. Youre confused. It's not just that cac/cracker doesn't have a history of racism associated with it, cracker isn't associated with racism period. Cracker doesn't currently reference anti-white racism and it never has. Posters referring to whites as cacs on this site isn't racism.

Again, racism isn't based on previous usage or historical potency, it's based on actions and the motivation for those actions...where that motivation is race. Short of pullout sock puppets to get you to understand this i'm not sure you'll ever get it. Look, you're the one who doesn't understand the definition of racism, not I. Racism is defined as a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others. Cracker simply does not fit that definition.



and you're position is wrong because every point in that positions is false.
1. Cac AND nygger are racist terms. (ergo they are similar)
2. cracker IS racist.

It's been pointed out how dumb your shyt sounds on more than one occasion and in multiple threads. You seam to think you have some unique "critical thinking" view on the subject when the fact of the matter is you're just plain wrong...and dumb.

C.a.c., C.A.N., Spi.c, Ni.g.ger = racist terms.Just because you say something doesn't make it true. Cracker is not racist as it never has been. You're just an overprotective captain save-a-whitey who's feelings are inexplicably hurt by the term cracker. Stop being the white man's guard dog. Your in here fighting tooth and nail to defend the white collective when it sees and treats you as inferior. Brown Pride my ass.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
You're trying to reinvent the word "can" as some kind of racial slur
Impossible. There is no historical usage of the word CAN as a racial slur ergo it cannot be a racist slur.

According to your logic, you're a racist as well for calling me a "can"
According to your logic I’m not because CAN isn’t a racist word(see the prior comment)


The daps that my posts receive have nothing to do with popularity. I'm not a popular poster. People just agree with the points that I've been making here. You, not so much. It is what it is.
:shocking: you mean on a predominately AA website where the term in question originated you found people who agree with you :comeon: let’s just stop this line of “proof that gravity is right” it’s so intellectually moot that the only reason I’m responding is so you don’t think that because other fools agree with you that you’re no fool. And in case you decided to continue to draw some correlation between you being correct and the amount of daps you get let’s agree that if you continue on down this line we’ll have to take the case to st0rmfr0nt, I mean if “daps” and cosigns are what make an argument correct I’m sure it should hold up anywhere.

Obviously you can't count either. There was more than one sentence there. Both sentences made perfect sense, the second just had a typo. "nor" instead of "not. I wasn't just talking trash though, I honestly couldn't understand what you were trying to say.
Fair enough what I wrote was messy especially with the ***. The point was moot anyhow basically I was saying that SP/IC wasn’t being blurred out with stars, sometime between me writing that message and it posting SP/IC was blurred.

Yes, I question your "brown pride" I explained why. You're waay too overprotective of whites. White people don't even cry about cracker/*** like you're doing here. You're on a website where the "*****" to "***" usage is like 100-1, and you're whining. The only form of racism thats insitutionalized is white supremacy, and you're crying about whites being referred to as cacs. Where does brown pride fit in with someone who thinks that white person being called a *** is the same as a Hispanic being called a ****?
The irony here is that I’ve argued up and down that the word N/gger is racist regardless of contexts. The problem with your line of thinking is that you’re placing degrees on racism. Which I suppose is fine if we’re discussing degrees of racism (black folks had/have it worse that anyone else…I’d not argue that), what I’m arguing is that cac is a racist term. I’m also on the “spi/cs” is a racist term as is “nig/ger”. In short my criteria for “racist term” is a term used to disparage/make fun of/show prejudice to a person or group of people based on race.

Using that criteria then the 3 words are racist words.

My issue with you is that you are trying to give a pass for people to use racist words against other people, and as for me I just don’t like that shyt. Hence me “fighting for whitey” when really I’m arguing against racism period. See the difference

ME: Racism is bad in all shapes and colors.
You: You can’t be racist to white people, it’s impossible.


My definition of racism is no different than the dictionary's definition of racism.
:wtf:
Come on now. I know this has been a long thread but you’ve applied a historical context to your definition from jump street, THIS IS WRONG.


How does the word cracker insult white people? I can tell you how **** insults Hispanics. I can tell you how ****** insults black people. You can't tell me show the word cracker itself insults white people.
I can and will. Like it’s been stated, go to work tomorrow and call your boss a cracker. See how that plays out. I mean if it’s just a term no harm no foul right? There are plenty of white folks AND black folks who find it to be insulting and uncouth, and in these parts used as a racial slur to demean white folks.


Youre confused. It's not that ***/cracker doesn't have a history of racism associated with it, cracker isn't associated with racism period. Cracker doesn't currently reference anti-white racism and it never has. Posters referring to whites as cacs on this site isn't racism.
and this really is the crux of the matter. It may not have a history as deep as other words but the word itself has a history, not all of it pleasant and MORE IMPORTANTLY has changed into a pretty mainline racial slur. That is what you’re not getting and where you keep running afoul of your application of history to define racism. RIGHT NOW that shyt is racist.

Look, you're the one who doesn't understand the definition of racism, not I. Racism is defined as 1.*a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others. Cracker simply does not fit that definition.
And as I’ve said
Racism:
1. 1. The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as...
2. 2. Prejudice or discrimination directed against someone of a different race based on such a belief.

Cracker and CAC do apply as they are used today.

Just because you say something doesn't make it true. Cracker is not racist as it never has been. You're just an overprotective captain save-a-whitey who's feelings are inexplicably hurt by the term cracker. Stop being the white man's guard dog. Your in here fighting tooth and nail to defend the white collective when it sees and treats you as inferior. Brown Pride my ***.
Again your true colors show with this statement. Your argument is entirely emotional. Your save a whitey comments do nothing more than highlight your HATE towards white people. It may or may not be subtle but you’re bitter, so you, not I, are catching emotions over someone NOT agreeing with your racist ass perspective. It’s ok Grav, whitey is not out to get you nor is he “da devil”. They are just people like you and me with different skin color.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,826
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,258
Impossible. There is no historical usage of the word CAN as a racial slur ergo it cannot be a racist slur. Which is why you calling me a "can" means nothing while me calling you a spic hurts your feelings


According to your logic I’m not because CAN isn’t a racist word(see the prior comment)I didnt call you a racist though. You called me a racist, so we're going by your logic. By your logic if I'm a racist then so are you

:shocking: you mean on a predominately AA website where the term in question originated you found people who agree with you :comeon: let’s just stop this line of “proof that gravity is right” it’s so intellectually moot that the only reason I’m responding is so you don’t think that because other fools agree with you that you’re no fool. And in case you decided to continue to draw some correlation between you being correct and the amount of daps you get let’s agree that if you continue on down this line we’ll have to take the case to st0rmfr0nt, I mean if “daps” and cosigns are what make an argument correct I’m sure it should hold up anywhere.Oh I get it, so the opinions of other posters here only matter when it's convenient for your BS agenda?[\B]
It's been pointed out how dumb your shyt sounds on more than one occasion and in multiple threads.
So this isn't you trying to use the socalled opinions of other posters to discredit me? The posters who have supposedly pointed out "how dumb your shyt" sounds hold weight but the posters who agree with the points that I'm making don't hold weight huh? It's funny how that works. I couldnt care less about the daps, but don't tell me that my argument is "shyt" or talk about how others think that my argument is dumb, when the posters agree with my position over yours. There's no comparison between the posters here and the racist site that you mentioned. You're probably a member of that site passing as white.


The irony here is that I’ve argued up and down that the word N/gger is racist regardless of contexts. The problem with your line of thinking is that you’re placing degrees on racism. Which I suppose is fine if we’re discussing degrees of racism (black folks had/have it worse that anyone else…I’d not argue that), what I’m arguing is that cac is a racist term. I’m also on the “spi/cs” is a racist term as is “nig/ger”. In short my criteria for “racist term” is a term used to disparage/make fun of/show prejudice to a person or group of people based on race. Well this is just your criteria for what constitutes a racist term. It's also just your opinion that the term cracker meets this criteria. I don't agree with you that the term cracker disparages, makes fun of, or shows prejudice to the white race. You can't explain how the word absent of context fits that description either. I'm not arguing degrees of racism, I'm telling you that the word by itself isn't racist. You insist upon trying to spin my argument because you can't refute it.

Using that criteria then the 3 words are racist words.Only if you pretend that cracker by itself disprages the white race. If you simply refer to whites as crackers then what's the dis? Explain how the word itself disparages or makes fun of white people

My issue with you is that you are trying to give a pass for people to use racist words against other people, and as for me I just don’t like that shyt. Hence me “fighting for whitey” when really I’m arguing against racism period. See the difference

ME: Racism is bad in all shapes and colors.
You: You can’t be racist to white people, it’s impossible. Here you go lying again. I've never said that it's impossible to be racist against whites, that's a lie. You're also being disingenuous with that "I'm against racism in all forms" BS. That's just a smoke-screen to divert attention away from being the white man's guard dog. You're not against racism, you're pro white supremacy. You run to a website where "nikka" is the most used racial slur by far, to whine about whites being referred to as crackers. You deserve a pat on the head.

:wtf:
Come on now. I know this has been a long thread but you’ve applied a historical context to your definition from jump street, THIS IS WRONG. Ive done no such thing. You just don't seem capable of understanding what I've been saying. Racism is racism.

I can and will. Like it’s been stated, go to work tomorrow and call your boss a cracker. See how that plays out. I mean if it’s just a term no harm no foul right? There are plenty of white folks AND black folks who find it to be insulting and uncouth, and in these parts used as a racial slur to demean white folks. This is why I question your intelligence. This is not an explanation for why cracker is supposedly a term that disprages the white race. This is nothing but a stupid analogy that I've already proven to be invalid over and over in this very thread. Using slang is never really appropriate when you're in a professional work environment. I wouldnt suggest referring to a white business associate as a cracker the same way I wouldn't suggest referring to black business associate as a brother. Why don't you go to your black boss tomorrow and refer to him as a "brother" or call him "dog" and see how that plays out. This is just how weak your silly argument is. Cracker is racist because it's not appropriate to use in a professional work environment? Please man


and this really is the crux of the matter. It may not have a history as deep as other words but the word itself has a history, not all of it pleasant and MORE IMPORTANTLY has chan ged into a pretty mainline racial slur. That is what you’re not getting and where you keep running afoul of your application of history to define racism. RIGHT NOW that shyt is racist. How is it racist now? What anti-white racism does the word cracker reference? Your only examples of anti-white racism are the group of posters here(who you don't know the real ethnicities of) refer to whites as cacs, and you want to lump that in with the hundreds of years of oppression that other races have been subjected to.


And as I’ve said
Racism:
1. 1. The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as...
2. 2. Prejudice or discrimination directed against someone of a different race based on such a belief.

Cracker and CAC do apply as they are used today.Cracker doesn't fit the definition of racism regardless of you trying to spin the definition. There's a reason that you insist upon cutting off the last part of the 1st definition given. Even going by the partial definition that you posted, cracker doesn't fit. There's nothing about the term cracker that says all white people share the same characteristics and that those characteristics are specific to whites only. I see posters describing different kinds of crackers/cacs all the time.


Again your true colors show with this statement. Your argument is entirely emotional. Your save a whitey comments do nothing more than highlight your HATE towards white people. It may or may not be subtle but you’re bitter, so you, not I, are catching emotions over someone NOT agreeing with your racist ass perspective. It’s ok Grav, whitey is not out to get you nor is he “da devil”. They are just people like you and me with different skin color.All of my statements show my true colors, I'm vey honest and easy to read. I don't hate white people, Im against white supremacy. Im against and don't have respect for anyone that perpetuates white supremacy whether they're white, black or brown like you claim to be. Emotion has nothing to do with my position. It's funny that you try to accuse of being emotional when you're the one who made this whiny crybaby thread. Posters referring to whites as cacs hurts your feelings so you made this thread. That's the definition of being emotional.


By the way, whitey aka the system aka white supremacy is out to get me. The system is designed to oppress and control people who look like me, and it's always been that way in this country. Thats not a copout, that's not me making excuses(personally I'm doing quite well), it's just a fact of life. You don't understand that because you're either too stupid to understand that or you directly support the system.
 

GoPro

EscoBeard Season Has Returned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,453
Reputation
2,195
Daps
32,070
Reppin
#CertLife #ITGang
According to you i made up words in the dictionary...:troll:


i'd expect nothing less from a racist. (which you are)


take that to JBO, this isn't a popularity contests.
since we're talking shyt i guess it would be prudent of me to point out that this sentence makes no sense and does in fact look like a 3rd grader wrote it.


I can't help that you don't see the shyt you do. You started wanting to get personal; attacking my "brownness". I guess that's to be expected as well.


sp/ic wasn't being edited from the forum, now it is. Up to speed yet?

Yes. If we use your fuked up definition of racism, rather than the ACTUAL definition we find in dictionaries.

A term used to insult someone based solely on race is RACISM you ignorant b*stard. This isn't magic, it isn't some obscure understanding of the subject, this is what racism is. Learn it.

and yet you said...

Bottom line is you've said time and again that the difference between N/gger and C/A/C is that one was historically used to fuk with a group of people while the other wasn't. HISTORY, per your argument, was the justification for CAC not being a racist term.

Again, racism isn't based on previous usage or historical potency, it's based on actions and the motivation for those actions...where that motivation is race. Short of pullout sock puppets to get you to understand this i'm not sure you'll ever get it.


and you're position is wrong because every point in that positions is false.
1. Cac AND nygger are racist terms. (ergo they are similar)
2. cracker IS racist.

It's been pointed out how dumb your shyt sounds on more than one occasion and in multiple threads. You seam to think you have some unique "critical thinking" view on the subject when the fact of the matter is you're just plain wrong...and dumb.

C.a.c., C.A.N., Spi.c, Ni.g.ger = racist terms.

New term we have here... Brown Pride's a SPOON :ohhh:
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
I think it's fair to say this thread is dead and the point has been :deadhorse:
I don't see what you see and you don't see what I see.

Cac is stared out here so i'm straight by it.
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
31,958
Reputation
2,692
Daps
44,030
:snoop: :pachaha:

You really are a clown poster. What's with you people wanting me to be somebody else? I have one name here and it can easily be verified.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFaFBoWnD8Q&feature=player_detailpage#t=11s]Connect the Dots Pee wee Herman's Community - YouTube[/ame]

:umad:
 
Top