bruh i was smoking and watching months ago and i dont care to watch this shyt again. dont your own research or gtfo
but if youre at all interested in the subject, there are gems on gems in this, i aint gonna spoon feed you man
But seriously, did O.J. do it?
- Thread starter levitate
- Start date
bruh i was smoking and watching months ago and i dont care to watch this shyt again. dont your own research or gtfo
but if youre at all interested in the subject, there are gems on gems in this, i aint gonna spoon feed you man
threattonature
Veteran
You sound stupid as fukk. You the one in here saying anybody that watched that is dumb if they aren't convinced of his guilt but now you was smoking and don't even remember what was so convincing.
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
He did it. We know he did it. His DNA at the scene, the way he continued to talk about her, and write that book, confirms it. That doesn’t mean the crime scene wasn’t poorly handled, and we know the LAPD, and especially Mark Fuhrman are racist. Mark Fuhrman deserves prostate cancer from his racism. But, OJ did it. He beat her, threatened to kill her. Yeah, she was a whore, yeah she cheated on him, yeah she was into cocaine, that doesn’t mean you can kill someone. He didn’t intend on killing Ron. Ron just happened to show up, at that time. Any man who walks in on that is going to try to help. He just failed. Was she smashing Ron? I mean, why would a waiter know your address? But again, no justification for murder.
Any husband or ex husband is going to be suspect number one for murder, because most people are murdered by someone they know, especially their spouse. Men have been killing their wives for centuries, and women have been hiring people to kill their husbands for centuries.
Any husband or ex husband is going to be suspect number one for murder, because most people are murdered by someone they know, especially their spouse. Men have been killing their wives for centuries, and women have been hiring people to kill their husbands for centuries.
This is where I am getting confused. Are you referring to actual documented issues with sample collection, or accusations made by Simpson's defense team?
Okay here's the problem since you are purposely being vague. The accusations made by the defense had no real basis in fact, as that was simply a theory they presented in order to justify Simpson's innocence. This is a common practice in defense cases. For whatever issues you are having with the sample collection still didn't stop the presiding judge from allowing some of it to be admitted. Simpson won a case where the evidence clearly put him at the scene... which is actually mind-boggling. This is not a case where the defense played a brilliant legal strategy as much as it was the prosecution totally dropping the ball.
levitate
I love you, you know.
No it doesn’t.
And any blood evidence could have been planted by a racist cop who plead the 5th when asked directly does he plant evidence.
@CreepyMcCreeperson what do you think regarding this post?
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
I bumped it after finishing the Netflix OJ Simpson documentary
WhenWeWereKings
All Star
As a teenager. I thought he didn't do it. As an adult, especially after going over all of the evidence in the trial, I think he probably did it.
The defense did an excellent job of muddying the water with some farfetched and not so farfetched theories. But they also established clear reasonable doubt.
Also it is clear that alot of ppl at the time did not understand (and still don't) the science that was being presented. This helped the defense's case immensely.
With that being said the prosecution did a god awful job of presenting their case. Darden and Clarke were both incredibly incompetent and way too overconfident. The LAPD was/is racist and incompetent and fukked up the evidence collection.
Guess we'll never really know for sure what really happened.
The defense did an excellent job of muddying the water with some farfetched and not so farfetched theories. But they also established clear reasonable doubt.
Also it is clear that alot of ppl at the time did not understand (and still don't) the science that was being presented. This helped the defense's case immensely.
With that being said the prosecution did a god awful job of presenting their case. Darden and Clarke were both incredibly incompetent and way too overconfident. The LAPD was/is racist and incompetent and fukked up the evidence collection.
Guess we'll never really know for sure what really happened.
Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
We’ll never know because the LAPD planted evidence.
Unlikely
Nicole, Faye, Ron (and everyone affiliated with the restaurant) ran with some real goblins.
OJ had too much to lose trying to body a couple of fiends — even if one was his ex
Nicole, Faye, Ron (and everyone affiliated with the restaurant) ran with some real goblins.
OJ had too much to lose trying to body a couple of fiends — even if one was his ex
BlackMajik
Behind Enemy Lines
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 42,522
- Reputation
- 11,421
- Daps
- 220,417
- Reppin
- DSGB(Down South Georgia Boy)
Nope